busydude
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2010
- 8,793
- 5
- 76
...It's also possible that God was the first troll.
People who created god were the first troll's.
...It's also possible that God was the first troll.
There are a lot more than 3 divisions of the church.
...THREE major divisions of Christianity.
As the saying goes (in english) god the father, god the son, god the holy spirit (holy ghost). These are all three the same thing, the same entity. And there is no actual "father" dude somewhere, no actual "son", no ghost - they are all energy, and they sometimes manifest themselves in ways that humans can understand (also in ways that other forms can understand, but that doesn't concern us because we're humans)
Jesus was a manifestation of divine energy that can be interpreted in many ways. If looked at a certain way, death isn't death, life isn't life, there is only eternal energy.
Lessons come from everywhere. If it floats your boat to learn from the religious masters, go for it. All is love.
/did a lot of peyote back in the day
Pretty sure I said...
Oh yeah, I did.
You're going to erroneously nitpick me over the division of Christianity, but I bet you couldn't even name them.
We are down now to the (lol) crux, of Christianity, that Jesus suffered and died for us!
This is why people devote their lives to him. It's a powerful idea. You are sinner. You are born a sinner. There is no way for you to cleanse yourself of sin (oops, in Catholicism, there is), and you can't live in heaven as a sinner, but you have a friend on your side, someone who will, take the punishment of god on himself, for your sins, so you may live eternally in heaven with god. Most Christians believe that Jesus is an eternal martyr; that he didn't just die that once on the cross, but dies for each and every one of us (who believes the correct things), when it is our time of need.
People devote their lives to Jesus because they think he is literally their savior. The rest of the stuff you have about the nature of Jesus and God is extraneous to the question.
Even Tolstoy regularly referenced more than 3 and that was a hundred years ago. I don't think your are going to get an agreement on 3 major divisions.
"suffered and died for us"
My question still stands (Which is aimed at the Christianity). If God knew what was going to happen after he sent his son to live and teach man, He surely knew that he was going to suffer and die for us. Which up until at this point, if Jesus had NOT resurrected, I wouldn't be asking this question; Why do people devote their lives to Jesus, when it was in Gods plan to resurrect his son all this time?
Aside from being completely wrong, your point is troll fail extraneous to this entire argument, and I am sad you even brought it up.
The whole Old Testament system of sacrifice existed because human sin merited death, but God allowed people to substitute an animal as an act of grace (note the many times in the Old Testament where God commanded the animal to be pure, spotless, etc.). But even with this, the people had to keep sacrificing because that animal only covered for the immediate merit of the sin.
"suffered and died for us"
My question still stands (Which is aimed at the Christianity). If God knew what was going to happen after he sent his son to live and teach man, He surely knew that he was going to suffer and die for us. Which up until at this point, if Jesus had NOT resurrected, I wouldn't be asking this question; Why do people devote their lives to Jesus, when it was in Gods plan to resurrect his son all this time?
So why dedicate ones life to Jesus, when his death was meaningless? When Jesus resurrected, the term "sacrifice" became nullified.
The assumption in your question is wrong. You assume that Jesus' death is meaningless, which it's not.
His sacrifice is not nullified just because he was resurrected.
Think it through by this example:
I make you a loan of $10,000. You pay me back 3 days later.
Is the loan I made to you meaningless just because you paid me back?
Was the meaning in giving you the loan nullified just because you pay me back?
The point of a sacrifice is that you're giving up something. In a Jewish sense, you're sacrificing the best of your flock and once you've sacrificed it, it's gone for good. If it comes back three days later, you didn't really sacrifice much did you? That's the difference between a sacrifice and a loan.
You're still stuck on the assumption that "the point of a sacrifice is that you're giving up something" where that something has to be permanent.
I believe that the key to Jesus' sacrifice is the idea that God (the only one capable of doing this act), in his infinite love and mercy, was willing to let himself be tortured and die so that humans can be permanently cleansed of their sins.
It's a gift from God, but only if they choose to accept that gift by believing in Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior.
It's a gift from God, but only if they choose to accept that gift by believing in Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior.
It's not an assumption, it's the definition of the word: Definition of SACRIFICE
1
: an act of offering to a deity something precious; especially : the killing of a victim on an altar
2
: something offered in sacrifice
3
a : destruction or surrender of something for the sake of something else
b : something given up or lost <the sacrifices made by parents>
God is the only one capable of letting himself be tortured and die?
It's a gift from God, but only if they choose to accept that gift by believing in Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior.
This statement grinds my gears every time I hear. There is no way a rational person is going to fall for that BS.. maybe you need to find a better way to preach(Time to edit the bible one more time.. may be throw in words like sex, tits, LOL, WTF, etc.. and you should be good).