Originally posted by: ProfJohn
How exactly did she get to be worth more than a million??Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy
Critiquing her for being successful is petty and ridiculous . . .
Yes, but she is being "critiqued" because she tried to portray herself as "an everyday, working-class American", which is simply not true, or what we quaintly used to call a "lie."
Oh right... she worked every day for it... thus "everyday working-class American"
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
How exactly did she get to be worth more than a million??Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy
Critiquing her for being successful is petty and ridiculous . . .
Yes, but she is being "critiqued" because she tried to portray herself as "an everyday, working-class American", which is simply not true, or what we quaintly used to call a "lie."
Oh right... she worked every day for it... thus "everyday working-class American"
But Obama, with a similar net worth, a family with both parents working hard every day, is a member of the 'elite,' right? How many times have you posted that?
The blatant intellectual dishonesty of some posters here never fails to amaze.
Originally posted by: palehorse
In order to compare her with the known statistics, accurately, you'd at least need to deduct her principal residence (~552k).
1.2 - 5.5 = 6.7
So, Palin's actual net worth is roughly $670k
Explanation, from wiki:
Net worth vs. financial assets
Recently, there has been some controversy over how to correctly determine a person's status as a millionaire. One of the two most commonly used measurements is net worth, which counts the total value of all property owned by a household minus the household's debts. According to this definition, a household owning an $800k home, $50k furnishing, two cars worth $60k, a $60k retirement savings account, $45k in mutual funds, and a $325k vacation home with a $250k mortgage, $40k in car loans, and $25k in credit card debt would be worth $1,025,000 and every individual in this household would thus be a millionaire. However, according to the net financial assets measurement, equity in one's principal residence is excluded, as are lifestyle assets, such as the car and furniture. Therefore the above example household would only have net financial assets of $80,000. Another term is "net investable assets".
IOW, she's not even a "millionaire" by most established measurements -- including the global report compiled annually by Capgemini for Merrill Lynch.
Whoa, what happened? Pleasant surprize, I must say.Originally posted by: palehorse
I'm still voting for Obama...
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Vic, both Obama's have law degrees.
Mrs Obama made $273,000 from her job and another $50,000 from her being a member of the board of TreeHouse Foods.
So Mrs O by herself makes more than both Palin and her husband.
And as Loki points out, the 'elite' title comes from the way he carries himself and the views he holds. His 'bitter' and 'cling' comments are all you have to know to understand the elite title.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Things Sarah Palin can name.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
How exactly did she get to be worth more than a million??Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy
Critiquing her for being successful is petty and ridiculous . . .
Yes, but she is being "critiqued" because she tried to portray herself as "an everyday, working-class American", which is simply not true, or what we quaintly used to call a "lie."
Oh right... she worked every day for it... thus "everyday working-class American"
HH: Governor, you mentioned the people who are struggling right now. Have you and your husband, Todd, ever faced tough economic times where you had to sit around a kitchen table and make tough choices?
SP: Oh my goodness, yes, Hugh. I know what Americans are going through. Todd and I, heck, we?re going through that right now even as we speak, which may put me again kind of on the outs of those Washington elite who don?t like the idea of just an everyday working class American running for such an office.
Originally posted by: palehorse
reposted... for those here who don't seem to get it.
Originally posted by: palehorse
In order to compare her with the known statistics, accurately, you'd at least need to deduct her principal residence (~552k).
1.2 - 5.5 = 6.7
So, Palin's actual net worth is roughly $670k
Explanation, from wiki:
Net worth vs. financial assets
Recently, there has been some controversy over how to correctly determine a person's status as a millionaire. One of the two most commonly used measurements is net worth, which counts the total value of all property owned by a household minus the household's debts. According to this definition, a household owning an $800k home, $50k furnishing, two cars worth $60k, a $60k retirement savings account, $45k in mutual funds, and a $325k vacation home with a $250k mortgage, $40k in car loans, and $25k in credit card debt would be worth $1,025,000 and every individual in this household would thus be a millionaire. However, according to the net financial assets measurement, equity in one's principal residence is excluded, as are lifestyle assets, such as the car and furniture. Therefore the above example household would only have net financial assets of $80,000. Another term is "net investable assets".
IOW, she's not even a "millionaire" by most established measurements -- including the global report compiled annually by Capgemini for Merrill Lynch.
Nothing happened. I've openly supported Obama since the beginning of his campaign. Without hijacking the thread beyond your reply, why the surprise? Just curious...Originally posted by: Trianon
Whoa, what happened? Pleasant surprize, I must say.Originally posted by: palehorse
I'm still voting for Obama...
Originally posted by: Robor
I call bullshit on her and her husband sitting around a table deciding whether to pay this bill or that bill. She's in the top 5% of families in this country and she wants us to believe she's struggling just like us right now? Yeah, right.
Originally posted by: sactoking
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: her209
Meh. $1 million is not that big of a deal anymore.
Exactly. Many working families already have net worth over a million. It just isn't a lot of money anymore.
Link please? Good luck finding one.
It's nice all you folks who think $1M isn't much can nod your heads without checking the facts. How many americans have net worths over one million dollars? Less than 10 million. That puts Palin in the top 3-5% of the country, i.e. not average. All of you who say your parents are worth $1M or more? Also not average.
Now I couldn't care less how rich she is, or even if she claims to be "one of the people." But you people who are saying that $1M in assets doesn't put you in elite company in this country are very simply wrong.
You do know that of all the millionaires in this country, something like 90% of them are worth $1,000,000-2,500,000 and consist mainly of small business owners, accountants, contractors, dry cleaners, storage unit operators, etc., right?
Your perception of the 'wealthy' is skewed by the media's portrayal of super-high-income earners. Income does not equal wealth. A millionaire CAN be an 'average American'.
Originally posted by: palehorse
reposted... for those here who don't seem to get it.
Originally posted by: palehorse
In order to compare her with the known statistics, accurately, you'd at least need to deduct her principal residence (~552k).
1.2 - 5.5 = 6.7
So, Palin's actual net worth is roughly $670k
Explanation, from wiki:
Net worth vs. financial assets
Recently, there has been some controversy over how to correctly determine a person's status as a millionaire. One of the two most commonly used measurements is net worth, which counts the total value of all property owned by a household minus the household's debts. According to this definition, a household owning an $800k home, $50k furnishing, two cars worth $60k, a $60k retirement savings account, $45k in mutual funds, and a $325k vacation home with a $250k mortgage, $40k in car loans, and $25k in credit card debt would be worth $1,025,000 and every individual in this household would thus be a millionaire. However, according to the net financial assets measurement, equity in one's principal residence is excluded, as are lifestyle assets, such as the car and furniture.Therefore the above example household would only have net financial assets of $80,000. Another term is "net investable assets".
IOW, she's not even a "millionaire" by most established measurements -- including the global report compiled annually by Capgemini for Merrill Lynch.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Amazing fact:
This is the first election since 1976 in which none of the four candidates is related to a former Senator.
Originally posted by: palehorse
Originally posted by: Robor
I call bullshit on her and her husband sitting around a table deciding whether to pay this bill or that bill. She's in the top 5% of families in this country and she wants us to believe she's struggling just like us right now? Yeah, right.
FFS, her family is NOT in the "top 5% of families in this country."
Contrary to the OP's attempts to demonstrate otherwise, she's not even a millionaire. (See above). Start paying attention damnit...
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Amazing fact:
This is the first election since 1976 in which none of the four candidates is related to a former Senator.
I'd also wager a bet these are the least wealthy candidates to run for office as well.
Last round we had Bush who had to be in the hundreds of millions and John Kerry who would have been the most wealthy president ever at an estimated net worth of 700 million.
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Amazing fact:
This is the first election since 1976 in which none of the four candidates is related to a former Senator.
I'd also wager a bet these are the least wealthy candidates to run for office as well.
Last round we had Bush who had to be in the hundreds of millions and John Kerry who would have been the most wealthy president ever at an estimated net worth of 700 million.
Perot?
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
not exacly working class, but not rich either, upper middle class imo
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
not exacly working class, but not rich either, upper middle class imo
If upper middle class in your neighborhood own airplanes and a 3500 square-foot home, you must live in a very strange place.
That's upper class all the way. If you have enough funds to own an airplane in addition to your $550k 3500 square foot home, there's nothing middle class about your standing. She's not absurdly rich, but she's upper class.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Amazing fact:
This is the first election since 1976 in which none of the four candidates is related to a former Senator.
I'd also wager a bet these are the least wealthy candidates to run for office as well.
Last round we had Bush who had to be in the hundreds of millions and John Kerry who would have been the most wealthy president ever at an estimated net worth of 700 million.
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Amazing fact:
This is the first election since 1976 in which none of the four candidates is related to a former Senator.
I'd also wager a bet these are the least wealthy candidates to run for office as well.
Last round we had Bush who had to be in the hundreds of millions and John Kerry who would have been the most wealthy president ever at an estimated net worth of 700 million.
John Kerry never claimed to be an average working American. He knew where he stood. He didn't pretend to be a common man in a silly lie.
The point is that she's either a liar or seriously out of touch with the average working-class American.