YAFFT: Which receivers would you play?

neovan

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2001
4,676
1
81
I need to pick 3 out of the 5:

Randy Moss vs. Cardinals
Darrell Jackson vs. Vikings
Deion Branch vs. Vikings
Reggie Wayne vs. Redskins
Reggie Williams vs. Houston

BTW: Here's the rest of my team

QB Bledsoe
QB Pennington
RB Portis
RB Barber
RB J. Lewis
TE Heap
TE H. Miller
K J. Feeley
DEF Denver
DEF Seattle
 

honkee

Diamond Member
Nov 5, 2004
4,118
1
76
branch
wayne
williams

Branch will merc em this weekend, hell get more catches than jackson
Colts are gonna light up the skins so hopefully wayne gets at least 1 td ;)
Reggie williams against the texans, nuff said
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
I love the Seahawks, but I would simply NOT have ANY of their recievers on a FF team. Why? Because they don't have a go-to guy. They like to spread them out and Hasselbeck usually finishes games throwing to like 6 different recievers.
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
I love the Seahawks, but I would simply NOT have ANY of their recievers on a FF team. Why? Because they don't have a go-to guy. They like to spread them out and Hasselbeck usually finishes games throwing to like 6 different recievers.

Funny you should say that because Darrell Jackson is the #2 overral receiver based on weekly averages, 2nd to Torry Holt.
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
I love the Seahawks, but I would simply NOT have ANY of their recievers on a FF team. Why? Because they don't have a go-to guy. They like to spread them out and Hasselbeck usually finishes games throwing to like 6 different recievers.

Funny you should say that because Darrell Jackson is the #2 overral receiver based on weekly averages, 2nd to Torry Holt.

Owned.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
I love the Seahawks, but I would simply NOT have ANY of their recievers on a FF team. Why? Because they don't have a go-to guy. They like to spread them out and Hasselbeck usually finishes games throwing to like 6 different recievers.

Funny you should say that because Darrell Jackson is the #2 overral receiver based on weekly averages, 2nd to Torry Holt.

Jackson is 8th in touchdowns and 17th in yards...

?
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
If you had to pick between Jackson or Branch to play against Minnesota...that's a tough one. I'd go with Jackson, because I'm sure he'll score more touchdowns since he's a lot more familiar with the complex offense Seattle runs.
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
I love the Seahawks, but I would simply NOT have ANY of their recievers on a FF team. Why? Because they don't have a go-to guy. They like to spread them out and Hasselbeck usually finishes games throwing to like 6 different recievers.

Funny you should say that because Darrell Jackson is the #2 overral receiver based on weekly averages, 2nd to Torry Holt.

Jackson is 8th in touchdowns and 17th in yards...

?

I'm going based on averages, because he had a bye week. And I'm judging based on fantasy points, because this is fantasy football we're talking about. My league you get standard 1 point per 10 yards and 6 for a TD. He is ranked 2nd. By the way, he is tied with several WR's for 2nd in TD's too.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
I love the Seahawks, but I would simply NOT have ANY of their recievers on a FF team. Why? Because they don't have a go-to guy. They like to spread them out and Hasselbeck usually finishes games throwing to like 6 different recievers.

Funny you should say that because Darrell Jackson is the #2 overral receiver based on weekly averages, 2nd to Torry Holt.

Jackson is 8th in touchdowns and 17th in yards...

?

I'm going based on averages, because he had a bye week. And I'm judging based on fantasy points, because this is fantasy football we're talking about. My league you get standard 1 point per 10 yards and 6 for a TD. He is ranked 2nd. By the way, he is tied with several WR's for 2nd in TD's too.

I'll take your word for it. This still surprises me though...I just don't think of Darryl Jackson as one of the most efficient FF recievers lol.