YADigitalCameraT

Mar 19, 2003
18,289
2
71
Not bad..I've never heard of it, but I love ultra-zoom cameras (especially with image stabilization) :thumbsup:
 

amol

Lifer
Jul 8, 2001
11,680
3
81
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Also, with one of the largest LCDs...running on AAs? :thumbsdown:

i just noticed that, it needs a much stronger battery
 

amol

Lifer
Jul 8, 2001
11,680
3
81
Originally posted by: CheapArse
No Zeiss lens, and I'd wait to see how good the IS is...but looks promising. :)

is the IS made by Canon?

sorry, i'm not in the higher-end part of digital cameras
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: CheapArse
No Zeiss lens, and I'd wait to see how good the IS is...but looks promising. :)

is the IS made by Canon?

sorry, i'm not in the higher-end part of digital cameras

IS = image stabalizer and I doubt it will be made by canon...but since Sony has never produced a camera with IS...it will be interesting to see how it turns out.
 

amol

Lifer
Jul 8, 2001
11,680
3
81
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: CheapArse
No Zeiss lens, and I'd wait to see how good the IS is...but looks promising. :)

is the IS made by Canon?

sorry, i'm not in the higher-end part of digital cameras

IS = image stabalizer and I doubt it will be made by canon...but since Sony has never produced a camera with IS...it will be interesting to see how it turns out.

haha, STUPID ME

i saw the S1 IS from Canon once, so I thought that IS was a product lineup by Canon

http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/st...11002&cachePartner=7000000000000005702

http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/st...11002&cachePartner=7000000000000005702

Two Panasonic models that are similar to the Sony . . .
 
Mar 19, 2003
18,289
2
71
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: CheapArse
No Zeiss lens, and I'd wait to see how good the IS is...but looks promising. :)

is the IS made by Canon?

sorry, i'm not in the higher-end part of digital cameras

IS = image stabalizer and I doubt it will be made by canon...but since Sony has never produced a camera with IS...it will be interesting to see how it turns out.

haha, STUPID ME

i saw the S1 IS from Canon once, so I thought that IS was a product lineup by Canon

http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/st...11002&cachePartner=7000000000000005702

http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/st...11002&cachePartner=7000000000000005702

Two Panasonic models that are similar to the Sony . . .

:laugh:

I have the S1 IS though. I :heart: it.
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
The panasonics are nice...I would get the Sony b/c I have a ton of memery sticks already. My next camera will be the Rebel XT though
 

amol

Lifer
Jul 8, 2001
11,680
3
81
Originally posted by: SynthDude2001
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: CheapArse
No Zeiss lens, and I'd wait to see how good the IS is...but looks promising. :)

is the IS made by Canon?

sorry, i'm not in the higher-end part of digital cameras

IS = image stabalizer and I doubt it will be made by canon...but since Sony has never produced a camera with IS...it will be interesting to see how it turns out.

haha, STUPID ME

i saw the S1 IS from Canon once, so I thought that IS was a product lineup by Canon

http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/st...11002&cachePartner=7000000000000005702

http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/st...11002&cachePartner=7000000000000005702

Two Panasonic models that are similar to the Sony . . .

:laugh:

I have the S1 IS though. I :heart: it./

really? i like it a lot except for the 3.2MP
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
Originally posted by: SynthDude2001
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: CheapArse
No Zeiss lens, and I'd wait to see how good the IS is...but looks promising. :)

is the IS made by Canon?

sorry, i'm not in the higher-end part of digital cameras

IS = image stabalizer and I doubt it will be made by canon...but since Sony has never produced a camera with IS...it will be interesting to see how it turns out.

haha, STUPID ME

i saw the S1 IS from Canon once, so I thought that IS was a product lineup by Canon

http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/st...11002&cachePartner=7000000000000005702

http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/st...11002&cachePartner=7000000000000005702

Two Panasonic models that are similar to the Sony . . .

:laugh:

I have the S1 IS though. I :heart: it.

The S1 IS is a nice camera if you don't need more than 3mp...can't wait until the S2...hopefully canon will release it this summer to compete with this new sony.
 

amol

Lifer
Jul 8, 2001
11,680
3
81
Originally posted by: CheapArse
The panasonics are nice...I would get the Sony b/c I have a ton of memery sticks already. My next camera will be the Rebel XT though

my old 9th grade photography teacher got one a week ago, i tested it out. simply amazing

hope you can get it soon


and if it weren't for the memory sticks, which would you get? i would actually be biased to the panasonic since i have a ton of SD cards
 
Mar 19, 2003
18,289
2
71
Originally posted by: Amol
really? i like it a lot except for the 3.2MP

Definitely. Movie mode is great, 10x zoom is great for stalking people :evil:, very very capable camera. 3.2MP isn't a problem for me - I very very rarely do prints larger than 4x6.

The S1 IS is a nice camera if you don't need more than 3mp...can't wait until the S2...hopefully canon will release it this summer to compete with this new sony.

If they do release an S2 (and it has just as good movie modes or better, and better low-light performance) - I'll buy it in a heartbeat :p
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: CheapArse
The panasonics are nice...I would get the Sony b/c I have a ton of memery sticks already. My next camera will be the Rebel XT though

my old 9th grade photography teacher got one a week ago, i tested it out. simply amazing

hope you can get it soon


and if it weren't for the memory sticks, which would you get? i would actually be biased to the panasonic since i have a ton of SD cards

Id say the Sony still, but that is a very loose conclusion as I havn't seen the camera in action. Usually I really like Sony...but this one kind of dumps all the things I like about sony...Recharge Lith-ion, Zeiss lens...seems the only thing it has going for it is the 12x opt with IS. When it comes out Id have to see how good the lens is and how good the IS is compared to the Panasonics...

By that time, there maybe a more concrete knowledge base about canon's S2.
 

aceO07

Diamond Member
Nov 6, 2000
4,491
0
76
Image Stabalizer is not strictly Canon. Though they do use "IS" on some of their expensive lenses. Panasonic also uses IS internal to camera. As well as Minolta ('anti-shake').

Panasonic Lumix models have IS and huge zoom too, if that's the main features they're looking for. It's also been out for a while and not too expensive.
 

amol

Lifer
Jul 8, 2001
11,680
3
81
Originally posted by: SynthDude2001
Originally posted by: Amol
really? i like it a lot except for the 3.2MP

Definitely. Movie mode is great, 10x zoom is great for stalking people :evil:, very very capable camera. 3.2MP isn't a problem for me - I very very rarely do prints larger than 4x6.

The S1 IS is a nice camera if you don't need more than 3mp...can't wait until the S2...hopefully canon will release it this summer to compete with this new sony.

If they do release an S2 (and it has just as good movie modes or better, and better low-light performance) - I'll buy it in a heartbeat :p

i hope S2 is at least 5 Megapixel and that it has a good sized LCD (hopefully 2" or more) :D
 
Mar 19, 2003
18,289
2
71
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: SynthDude2001
Originally posted by: Amol
really? i like it a lot except for the 3.2MP

Definitely. Movie mode is great, 10x zoom is great for stalking people :evil:, very very capable camera. 3.2MP isn't a problem for me - I very very rarely do prints larger than 4x6.

The S1 IS is a nice camera if you don't need more than 3mp...can't wait until the S2...hopefully canon will release it this summer to compete with this new sony.

If they do release an S2 (and it has just as good movie modes or better, and better low-light performance) - I'll buy it in a heartbeat :p

i hope S2 is at least 5 Megapixel and that it has a good sized LCD (hopefully 2" or more) :D

oooh yeah, definitely - I've got no problems with the 1.5" on the S1 IS, but bigger is better...
 

psiu

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2003
1,629
1
0
see sig

EDIT: no one has reviewed yet...would wait to see reviews unless you like being the guinea pig.
 

AndrewR

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,157
0
0
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: CheapArse
The panasonics are nice...I would get the Sony b/c I have a ton of memery sticks already. My next camera will be the Rebel XT though

my old 9th grade photography teacher got one a week ago, i tested it out. simply amazing

hope you can get it soon


and if it weren't for the memory sticks, which would you get? i would actually be biased to the panasonic since i have a ton of SD cards

Id say the Sony still, but that is a very loose conclusion as I havn't seen the camera in action. Usually I really like Sony...but this one kind of dumps all the things I like about sony...Recharge Lith-ion, Zeiss lens...seems the only thing it has going for it is the 12x opt with IS. When it comes out Id have to see how good the lens is and how good the IS is compared to the Panasonics...

By that time, there maybe a more concrete knowledge base about canon's S2.

Zeiss was apparently not willing to put their lens in a camera with IS -- something about the way it mucks with the lens (read it somewhere, probably dpreview). Sony produces their own lenses and has achieved good results, and their imaging chips are among the best in the world so that's still a huge plus.

I was wondering is this is the same imaging chip used in the F717, but it isn't (2/3" in F717 vs. 1/2.5" in the H1 -- F717 is larger), which is a shame. Nevertheless, lens probably is very good with a reasonably fast f2.8. Wide angle isn't very wide at 36mm equivalent, but with a 12x zoom, most people won't be buying for the wide angle, will they? Reasonably fast 1/2000 max shutter. LCD is probably the same as the T series or the W series (W7 has same specs), which is apparently fantastic. I can't tell if the AF Illuminator is via flash or by laser (laser is preferred -- it's perfect though a bit slow, hard to capture a moving child for instance). Highest ISO is 400, but my F717's 800 is not very great, lots of noise. It's likely the low light performance of the H1 is excellent, which is a tradition of Sony's almost.

Just off the top of my head. Looks like a very interesting offering. Not a horrendous price either.