• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

YAD(rug)T: Article on CNN

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITI...legal.drugs/index.html

NEW YORK (CNN) -- Here's something to think about:

How many police officers and sheriff's deputies are involved in investigating and solving crimes involving illegal drugs? And arresting and transporting and interrogating and jailing the suspects?

How many prosecutors and their staffs spend time prosecuting drug cases? How many defense lawyers spend their time defending drug suspects?

How many hours of courtroom time are devoted to drug trials? How many judges, bailiffs, courtroom security officers, stenographers, etc., spend their time on drug trials?

How many prison cells are filled with drug offenders? And how many corrections officers does it take to guard them? How much food do these convicts consume?

And when they get out, how many parole and probation officers does it take to supervise their release? And how many ex-offenders turn right around and do it again?

So how's this war on drugs going?

Someone described insanity as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result each time. That's a perfect description of the war on drugs.

The United States is the largest illegal drug market in the world. Americans want their weed, crack, cocaine, heroin, whatever. And they're willing to pay big money to get it.

The drug suppliers are only too happy to oblige. The Mexican drug cartels now have operations in 230 American cities. That's 230 American cities!

And we're not just talking about border towns, but places such as Anchorage, Alaska; Boston, Massachusetts; Atlanta, Georgia; and Billings, Montana. They're everywhere. And they don't just bring drugs, but violence and crime as well -- lots of it at no extra charge.

They have been able to infiltrate those 230 cities because we have not bothered to secure our borders. In addition to illegal aliens who come here to work and avail themselves of our social programs, we have criminals from Mexico bringing drugs in, taking money and guns back, and recruiting American kids into their criminal enterprises while they're here. iReport.com: Is it time to legalize pot?

What do you suppose the total price tag is for this failed war on drugs? One senior Harvard economist estimates we spend $44 billion a year fighting the war on drugs. He says if they were legal, governments would realize about $33 billion a year in tax revenue. Net swing of $77 billion. Could we use that money today for something else? You bet your ass we could. Plus the cartels would be out of business. Instantly. Goodbye crime and violence.

If drugs were legalized, we could empty out a lot of our prison cells. People will use this stuff whether it's legal or not. Just like they do booze. And you could make the argument that in some cases alcohol is just as dangerous as some drugs. I know.

Like I said ... something to think about. It's time.

I know how this is a hot topic that usually attract 100+ replys so I thought I'd share. I did not check for reposts for the same reason since such a thread would still be on top.
 
Marajuana's a no-brainer. Legalize it and regulate/tax it like cigarettes.

Other drugs aren't so clear-cut, but what we're doing obviously isn't working. Certainly we don't need crack available at every 7-11, but there's got to be some good middle ground somewhere.
 
Originally posted by: rivan
Marajuana's a no-brainer. Legalize it and regulate/tax it like cigarettes.

Other drugs aren't so clear-cut, but what we're doing obviously isn't working. Certainly we don't need crack available at every 7-11, but there's got to be some good middle ground somewhere.

A+
 
Originally posted by: rivan
Marajuana's a no-brainer. Legalize it and regulate/tax it like cigarettes.

Other drugs aren't so clear-cut, but what we're doing obviously isn't working. Certainly we don't need crack available at every 7-11, but there's got to be some good middle ground somewhere.

The middle ground is always the MOST dangerous.
 
The funny apart about some of the lesser drugs is that there are perfectly legal equivalents. The only difference is that one gives money straight to the big pharm companies, the other goes to a drug dealer's pocket so he can buy more guns.

Take a look at Oxycotton:
http://www.webmd.com/mental-he...rug-of-choice-for-many

The stuff is considered "better than heroin" by some. Of course Rush Limbaugh had no problem taking it. Many street drugs would be much safer if they were controlled in some fashion and taxed, rather than just outright banned which allows the criminal underground to flourish in sale of said substance at many times its production value.
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
I want to hear the right wing bobble head (ala Rush Limaugh) response to this.

It was something about hordes of negro zombie-addicts stealing all the white women.
 
Originally posted by: ggnl
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
I want to hear the right wing bobble head (ala Rush Limaugh) response to this.

It was something about hordes of negro zombie-addicts stealing all the white women.

Isn't that the plot for Resident Evil 5?
 
Marijuana should definitely be legal. Meth on the other hand... That stuff is just nasty. If you get a chance to, watch the PBS Frontline special on it.
 
Originally posted by: Kadarin
Marijuana should definitely be legal. Meth on the other hand... That stuff is just nasty. If you get a chance to, watch the PBS Frontline special on it.

I wonder how much of that is due to the half-assed measures used to make it... some of my older friends have said it's a very different drug now than it was in the 80s.
 
Originally posted by: IGBT
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: IGBT
dope is for dopers. ya wana be a doper?

Wow, the logic in your argument is truly dizzying.

let me guess. you like to get doper dizzy.

Let me guess, you're incapable of making any clear, concise argument against the points raised in the article, and in fact cannot even debate your way out of a wet paper sack.
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: IGBT
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: IGBT
dope is for dopers. ya wana be a doper?

Wow, the logic in your argument is truly dizzying.

let me guess. you like to get doper dizzy.

Let me guess, you're incapable of making any clear, concise argument against the points raised in the article, and in fact cannot even debate your way out of a wet paper sack.

wet paper sacks are for DOPERS.

yah a doper?
 
Originally posted by: IGBT
dope is for dopers. ya wana be a doper?

You're like the poster-boy of why people should smoke. See kids, if you don't want to end up a stupid, bitter, hateful old man like him, you better start toking!


More on-topic, there's been so much noise around relaxing MJ laws that it makes me think something *might* happen by the end of Obama's second term.
 
Originally posted by: Martin
Originally posted by: IGBT
dope is for dopers. ya wana be a doper?

You're like the poster-boy of why people should smoke. See kids, if you don't want to end up a stupid, bitter, hateful old man like him, you better start toking!


More on-topic, there's been so much noise around relaxing MJ laws that it makes me think something *might* happen by the end of Obama's second term.
the worse the economy stays, the more likely

sad that it takes the prospect of tax money to reinstitute a basic human freedom (doing what you wish to your own body)
 
Back
Top