Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
A 170 degree thermostat will leave your car in "warm-up" mode and will be bad for the engine unless you have it really souped up.
The 180 degree thermostat is an OK choice if you live someplace like SoCal or the Southwestern desert but can prolong the "warm-up" mode in colder climates.
192 degree is the stock thermostat in most modern vehicles and generally yields the best fuel mileage and emissions. Plus, this is the thermostat that your engine management computer is programmed to function with.
ZV
Originally posted by: Heisenberg
A cooler thermostat is generally better for the engine and for performance, while a warmer one is better for emissions. However, if you go with too cold a thermostat that can be bad as well.
Originally posted by: Ronstang
That is completely false. An engine is better off being hot, comparatively speaking, up to a point. A hotter engine does not wear as fast and makes more power. Hotter is better for emissions also. The colder the air entering the engine the better it is for performance. Back n the days of carburetors engines had to be run cooler than desirable due to design. The intake carried and air/fuel mixture and if it got too hot in the intake the fuel would fall out of suspension and the engine would simply not run. With port fuel injection the intake carries only air so an engine can be run hotter for more efficiency and durability.
Originally posted by: redly1
I need to replace the thermostat in my car.
there are 3 choices...170F, 180F and 192F.
what are the advantages of going with a cooler or hotter thermostat?
it looks like 180F is the norm