Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Howard
Let me say this for the billionth time - the less backpressure you have, the better.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that it's only true to a certain extent.
No, it's always true.
I wouldn't say "always". A complete absence of backpressure could cause a reduction in low-end torque. It would also sound like sh!t with most engines, very loud and raspy. In other words, it might have more top-end hp, but it would be less streetable.
The idea of having a true dual exhaust is to make sure that none of the individual cylinder exhaust pulses interfere with each other. It has absolutely nothing to do with twin- or single-bank engines.
Breaking down various engines:
- In a 4 cylinder, the exhaust pulses are 180 degrees seperated from each other. The maximum possible length of each exhaust pulse is 180 degrees (real life is shorter, like 120 degrees, depending on numerous factors, like cam length and duration, individual to each engine design). Dual exhaust would provide absolutely no benefit.
- In a 6 cylinder, the exhaust pulses are 120 degrees seperated from each other. See above, minimal benefit if any. Same goes for rotaries, which also fire 3 times per revolution.
- In an 8 cylinder, the exhaust pulses are 90 degrees seperated from each other. And as V8's tend to fire a cylinder on one bank and then a cylinder on the other bank in firing order (this is not typical of all twin-bank engines, particularly boxer-4's, which fire 2 on one side then the 2 on the other side in order), dual exhaust would be very beneficial. As with any engine with even more cylinders.