YA(We never landed on the moon)T

[OokiiNeko]

"then came across the mythbusters show about it on youtube and changed my mind."

Mythbuster's did this in atmosphere, atmosphere scatters light, bad experiment that would have been ripped by AT ten years ago.


They never went to the moon. Into orbit, sure. But radiation BEYOND the Earth's protective magnetic fields (Van Allen Belts can be ignored for this argument) would have fried the astronauts. Especially during the various solar flares that occurred during each and every mission.

Other arguments pertain, but more circumstantial. My favorite, not once during the videos do you see an astronaut stop, look up and stare. Seeing the stars without any atmosphere in the way. Probably the most beautiful night sky any human would have had access to. And yet, not once does an astronaut get captivated by such a sight. This is a weak argument, I know, but it still strikes me as strange. To be called by the stars, and then, when they can see them as no other human has, to ignore them completely.

 

[IronWing]

If we didn't go to the moon where do these chowder heads think moon pies come from?

 

[IronWing]

Originally posted by: OokiiNeko
"then came across the mythbusters show about it on youtube and changed my mind."

Mythbuster's did this in atmosphere, atmosphere scatters light, bad experiment that would have been ripped by AT ten years ago.


They never went to the moon. Into orbit, sure. But radiation BEYOND the Earth's protective magnetic fields (Van Allen Belts can be ignored for this argument) would have fried the astronauts. Especially during the various solar flares that occurred during each and every mission.

Other arguments pertain, but more circumstantial. My favorite, not once during the videos do you see an astronaut stop, look up and stare. Seeing the stars without any atmosphere in the way. Probably the most beautiful night sky any human would have had access to. And yet, not once does an astronaut get captivated by such a sight. This is a weak argument, I know, but it still strikes me as strange. To be called by the stars, and then, when they can see them as no other human has, to ignore them completely.

The claim that there is radiation up there and that it is harmful is a lie of Satan. Once you break through the blockade, it's angels everywhere up there. Dr. Ransom proved it.

 

[invidia]

Moon landing was a fake to use against the Soviets. It was filmed in the Nevada desert using wires to simulate gravity. It is just physically impossible to reach the moon, let alone leave Earth's atmosphere. I'm not a theorist, just stating some facts.

 

[preslove]

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer

Originally posted by: DieselIndustry
it was a hoax

the shuttles were later flown to North Dakota where they were disassembled and the parts were used to build the machinery used to grow and harvest GMO soy

No, you've got it all wrong. We really landed on the moon, where we discovered evidence of an ancient civilization. NASA started the conspiracy theory to hide the details of what was really found.

No no no no.

All the money for the "moon landing" was used by the government to plan 9/11 and to breed the perfect African messiah baby in a Kenyan laboratory to become the President and eventual antichrist to fulfill the Mayan prophecy of the 2012 apocalypse.

It's as clear as day you ignorant muggles!

 

[PieIsAwesome]

Originally posted by: invidia
Moon landing was a fake to use against the Soviets. It was filmed in the Nevada desert using wires to simulate gravity. It is just physically impossible to reach the moon, let alone leave Earth's atmosphere. I'm not a theorist, just stating some facts.

wat

 

[Gibsons]

Originally posted by: PieIsAwesome

Originally posted by: invidia
Moon landing was a fake to use against the Soviets. It was filmed in the Nevada desert using wires to simulate gravity. It is just physically impossible to reach the moon, let alone leave Earth's atmosphere. I'm not a theorist, just stating some facts.

wat

It's true. For instance, we don't really have sattelites to transmit TV signals, that's done with really fast homing pigeons carrying VHS tapes.

 

[irishScott]

Originally posted by: invidia
Moon landing was a fake to use against the Soviets. It was filmed in the Nevada desert using wires to simulate gravity. It is just physically impossible to reach the moon, let alone leave Earth's atmosphere. I'm not a theorist, just stating some facts.

I'm pretty sure this word doesn't mean what you think it means...

 

[irishScott]

Originally posted by: Gibsons

Originally posted by: PieIsAwesome

Originally posted by: invidia
Moon landing was a fake to use against the Soviets. It was filmed in the Nevada desert using wires to simulate gravity. It is just physically impossible to reach the moon, let alone leave Earth's atmosphere. I'm not a theorist, just stating some facts.

wat

It's true. For instance, we don't really have sattelites to transmit TV signals, that's done with really fast homing pigeons carrying VHS tapes.

OT: I really wish I had the time to perfect a system like that. Fuck NetFlix.

 

[venkman]

I miss when swindling America only cost $30 billion dollars.

 

[moparacer]

Which ones are more retarded the moon landing or the 911 ones?

Need a poll but both are neck and neck for the fucktard award.....

 

[IronWing]

Originally posted by: moparacer
Which ones are more retarded the moon landing or the 911 ones?

Need a poll but both are neck and neck for the fucktard award.....

What? 911 never happened. There never was a World Trade Center to begin with. The story was made out of whole cloth. Everybody knows this!

 

[SparkyJJO]

Astronauts landed on the moon. Several times.

/thread

 

[OokiiNeko]

Radiation. And lots of it. In space. Deadly.

/deal with it.

 

[Gibsons]

Originally posted by: OokiiNeko
Radiation. And lots of it. In space. Deadly.

/deal with it.

Please tell us exactly how much, in rems, one would be exposed to on a lunar mission.

Also tell us how/why the USSR cooperated with the hoax, at the height of the cold war.

 

[irishScott]

Originally posted by: OokiiNeko
"then came across the mythbusters show about it on youtube and changed my mind."

Mythbuster's did this in atmosphere, atmosphere scatters light, bad experiment that would have been ripped by AT ten years ago.


They never went to the moon. Into orbit, sure. But radiation BEYOND the Earth's protective magnetic fields (Van Allen Belts can be ignored for this argument) would have fried the astronauts. Especially during the various solar flares that occurred during each and every mission.

Other arguments pertain, but more circumstantial. My favorite, not once during the videos do you see an astronaut stop, look up and stare. Seeing the stars without any atmosphere in the way. Probably the most beautiful night sky any human would have had access to. And yet, not once does an astronaut get captivated by such a sight. This is a weak argument, I know, but it still strikes me as strange. To be called by the stars, and then, when they can see them as no other human has, to ignore them completely.

You do know the necks of those suits don't move right? They probably were looking up, as much as the visor let them.

 

[datalink7]

Read it and weep conspiracy theorists.

 

[Jeff7]

Originally posted by: OokiiNeko
Radiation. And lots of it. In space. Deadly.

/deal with it.

Yeah, there's some radiation out there.
1) They were inside a spaceship that provided at least some shielding.
2) They were fortunate enough not to get hit by any CMEs headed this way.
3) The duration of their exposure was short.
4) Leaving Earth's magnetic field presents risks, but it's not instantly fatal.



Also, concerning the "argument" that they didn't stand to stare:
1) Were they recording each and every single movement they made the entire time they were there?
2) Did you watch it all?
3) Would you take the time to record someone else staring at something? (Assuming you aren't Steven Speilberg.)
4) They were just in a spaceship that had a good view of the stars for the entire duration of the trip.
5) Damn that's a pathetic argument.

 

[lupi]

and 9/11 was some of copperfield's greatest work.

 

[vital]

that article is anti-american!

 

[OokiiNeko]

"You do know the necks of those suits don't move right? They probably were looking up, as much as the visor let them."
I'll roll with that. Still, seems the old Earth habit of leaning back would kick in every now and then.

"Also tell us how/why the USSR cooperated with the hoax, at the height of the cold war."
Did the Soviets have the capability to track the craft? How would they know?

"They were fortunate enough not to get hit by any CMEs headed this way."
Wrong. Solar flares recorded during each mission. Lots and lots of radiation. That must have been some awesome aluminum foil.



P.S. Radiation.

 

[KillerCharlie]

That's one hell of a conspiracy of the tens of thousands of engineers working on it have kept their mouths shut.

There are always a few dumbasses (see the guy above me) out there though... what can you do?

 

[91TTZ]

Originally posted by: OokiiNeko
"You do know the necks of those suits don't move right? They probably were looking up, as much as the visor let them."
I'll roll with that. Still, seems the old Earth habit of leaning back would kick in every now and then.

"Also tell us how/why the USSR cooperated with the hoax, at the height of the cold war."
Did the Soviets have the capability to track the craft? How would they know?

"They were fortunate enough not to get hit by any CMEs headed this way."
Wrong. Solar flares recorded during each mission. Lots and lots of radiation. That must have been some awesome aluminum foil.



P.S. Radiation.

You conspiracy theorists are so funny. So stupid, too.

 

[Narse]

OokiiNeko explain how we can bounce light off of the reflectors on the moon that we put there then?

 

[Safeway]

Originally posted by: Narse
OokiiNeko explain how we can bounce light off of the reflectors on the moon that we put there then?

It is really an airplane with a mirror.