XKCD 5/1/09

[Demon-Xanth]

Not at the picture itself, but the hover text.

🙂

 

[moonbit]

The hover text usually (not always) makes it worth it

 

[LordMorpheus]

For those that don't already get the reference.

 

[TheVrolok]

I love it when he references earlier comics, or inside-comic jokes.

 

[rocadelpunk]

haha i lol'd as well

 

[waggy]

lol yeah that was pretty god. and the orginal comic was pretty good too


xkcd is one of those comics that are "meh" most of the time. but every now and then youget one that is great.

 

[KeithTalent]

That was ok, but I prefer the original one, that one still makes me lol.

KT

 

[Newbian]

Yea, the bobcat one was much better.

 

[KeithTalent]

I did quite enjoy the C&H today: http://www.explosm.net/comics/1642/

KT

 

[SonicIce]

Originally posted by: KeithTalent
I did quite enjoy the C&H today: http://www.explosm.net/comics/1642/

KT

😀

 

[Exterous]

I chuckled. I almost always enjoy xkcd

 

[Miramonti]

Originally posted by: KeithTalent
I did quite enjoy the C&H today: http://www.explosm.net/comics/1642/

KT

haha 😀

 

[Goosemaster]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4FcHxDBel0

 

[Atomic Playboy]

The original one is great. The new one is only funny because of the existence of the old one.

 

[oogabooga]

I didn't laugh. Then I saw the reference comment and laughed. I get why that would have been good, I just don't read XKCD enough it seems.

 

[James Bond]

Loved the connection.

 

[shortylickens]

The hover texts are usually good, but this one made me smile.
http://xkcd.com/570/

 

[MotF Bane]

The original was better. I like that idea though, packages are fun. 🙂