XGI is back!

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,003
126
I can't wait to see what kind of driver stunts they pull off this time.
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
So, Sept 04 = X700/6600GT
Jan/Feb/Mar 05 = XGI product.

That means they will be at least 3 months late to market, maybe up to 6 months late. By which time, nVidia and ATi will be probably leaking specs for their refreshes of the products.
 

PrayForDeath

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2004
3,478
1
76
Originally posted by: Lonyo
So, Sept 04 = X700/6600GT
Jan/Feb/Mar 05 = XGI product.

That means they will be at least 3 months late to market, maybe up to 6 months late. By which time, nVidia and ATi will be probably leaking specs for their refreshes of the products.

Assuming you'll find X700/6600GT by Sept 04 :disgust:

By the way, what's that X700? Never heard of it!
 

Insomniak

Banned
Sep 11, 2003
4,836
0
0
Originally posted by: Yanagi
Built in dual core support.. Seems like a SLI solution on one chip :eek:


Eh, XGI has done this with all their chips.

It...uh...well, it didn't work. We'll put it simply.
 

PrayForDeath

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2004
3,478
1
76
I actually hope that they will be able to compete with nVidia/ATI, prices will drop, every company will shows us its best to get to the top, and we, as consumers will benefit from this war.
Quote: "Competition Makes The Best" By unknown....
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
XGI just doesnt have the resources or talent to compete at the high end, im glad to see they are trying to chip away at the more lucritive markets to bring in some revenue.

The only way i can see XGI actually pulling ahead of ATi and NVIDIA is by dramatically increasing their R&D budget and team, which they cant possibly afford after their "grand opening flop" with their last card.
 

Alkaline5

Senior member
Jun 21, 2001
801
0
0
Originally posted by: PrayForDeath
By the way, what's that X700? Never heard of it!

Here's the highlights:
Produced on 0.11u process at TSMC
8 Pixel Pipelines
6 Vertex Pipelines
128-bit Memory Bus

Clock speeds should be similar to the 6600 series, but rumor has it that there's no AGP version planned at all. ATI is really shooting themselves in the foot by not making new gen AGP cards (aside from the X800Pro) available.
 

SneakyStuff

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2004
4,294
0
76
XGI needs to be concerned about the low-end market, and integrated market, THAT's where the lucrative cash flow/return is. ATI and nVidia have the middle-high end markets covered, not to mention they have more resources, and experience.
 

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
Originally posted by: Insomniak
Originally posted by: Yanagi
Built in dual core support.. Seems like a SLI solution on one chip :eek:


Eh, XGI has done this with all their chips.

It...uh...well, it didn't work. We'll put it simply.

Former Voodoo5 owner here...

Dual core doesn't mean sh!t if they are crappy cores to begin with.
 

Dman877

Platinum Member
Jan 15, 2004
2,707
0
0
Originally posted by: Alkaline5
Originally posted by: PrayForDeath
By the way, what's that X700? Never heard of it!

Here's the highlights:
Produced on 0.11u process at TSMC
8 Pixel Pipelines
6 Vertex Pipelines
128-bit Memory Bus


God damn it! I was intreagued right up until the last line. Oh well.
 

Insomniak

Banned
Sep 11, 2003
4,836
0
0
Originally posted by: Captain_Howdy
Originally posted by: Insomniak
Originally posted by: Yanagi
Built in dual core support.. Seems like a SLI solution on one chip :eek:


Eh, XGI has done this with all their chips.

It...uh...well, it didn't work. We'll put it simply.

Former Voodoo5 owner here...

Dual core doesn't mean sh!t if they are crappy cores to begin with.


Yes....


and you felt the need to emphasize this because....?
 

Pete

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
4,953
0
0
X700 = RV410 = 1/2 a R420, just like the 6600GT is "1/2" a 6800.

There may be some catches, though (for instance, the 6600 has 1/4, not 1/2, the ROPs of the 6800). We'll see how many--and if they even matter--when review boards arrive.
 

VIAN

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2003
6,575
1
0
Tha'ts a really crappy time to launch new cards. By that time, it will compete with the lowend of ATI and Nvidia when they release their new Gen Cards.

Former Voodoo5 owner here...

Dual core doesn't mean sh!t if they are crappy cores to begin with.
Voodoo5 ruled!
 

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
XGI still hanging in there

What a bunch of jokers over at XGI. "Still hanging in there." Yeah, they're still in there because their last generation was such a success, ROFL.

These guys are such great talkers; they make ATI and Nvidia's paper launches look great.

I think, to save everyone the trouble, XGI should forget about the desktop market and focus on another lucrative market: they should be the exclusive provider of GPU's for the Infinium Labs Phantom video game console!!!

Then they can just blame eachother for the lack of any concrete product! You can see the headlines now: "Infinium blames XGI GPU shortage on Phantom unavailability." Or "XGI to ship 3 million Volari chips to Infinium Labs for new vaporware console."

-----------------------------

This is a classic tidbit from the Inquirer article to tell you the Volari is bs:

The new cores are almost taped out, and in order to hedge bets, both cores have been designed at both .13 and .09.

When would ATI or Nvidia pull this nonsense? "We've designed our core to run on two manufacturing processes, just to cover our @sses."
 

Sonic587

Golden Member
May 11, 2004
1,146
0
0
XGI should probably aim lower. They would be better off trying for the low-end market. If they could come up with a ~$100 DX9/SM3 product that's gives a good boost over the 5200's and 9200's (not hard to do), they could get their foot in the door, instead of it hitting them in the @ss.
 

nitromullet

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2004
9,031
36
91
XGI is already going for the low end market.

http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDesc.asp?description=14-145-092&depa=0

I think you guys are being a little overly critical on XGI. If they can compete successfully in the low-end/OEM market, they may eventually be a real alternative to nVidia or ATI. You have to remember that ATi used to really suck also in terms of high-end performance, but they had a revenue stream because of their low-end and OEM deals and now they have some really fast cards and the a deal with M$ for the Xbox2. In the heyday of 3dfx would anyone have ever thought that ATi would ever build the fastest cards around for almost 2 years in a row? You can't predict what will happen in this industry, and at least there is another player trying to enter the market.
 

Insomniak

Banned
Sep 11, 2003
4,836
0
0
Originally posted by: Captain_Howdy
Yes.... and you felt the need to emphasize this because....?

Sorry, I'm still bitter about dropping 200 bucks on that joke of a video card. Poor 3DFX.



Heh, fair enough.

Anyway, back to the OP, I don't think XGI is so much "back" as "still managing to be not-dead for the forseeable fiscal quarter". I don't see them sticking around very long.