- Jul 17, 2003
- 13,199
- 1
- 81
Inq article. Looks legit, but TWO molex connectors?!
EDIT:AMDMB Article. Massive heatsinks on that thing...
EDIT:AMDMB Article. Massive heatsinks on that thing...
Originally posted by: boyRacer
Anyway... Hercules has something under wraps... :Q
Originally posted by: modedepe
Originally posted by: boyRacer
Anyway... Hercules has something under wraps... :Q
Lol, what could be under there![]()
Originally posted by: pakotlar
Originally posted by: modedepe
Originally posted by: boyRacer
Anyway... Hercules has something under wraps... :Q
Lol, what could be under there![]()
holy shite!!!! could that be a dual r350? OH MY GOD!
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: pakotlar
Originally posted by: modedepe
Originally posted by: boyRacer
Anyway... Hercules has something under wraps... :Q
Lol, what could be under there![]()
holy shite!!!! could that be a dual r350? OH MY GOD!
i say its an adult toy
Originally posted by: MonkeyDriveExpress
bump for new pics
I'm no expert on reading RAM for speeds, but in this pic it looks like 2.0ns Samsung RAM on the card.
Huh? What does nVidia have to do with the XGI cards? And it also has nothing to do with the inability to build a faster GPU, but if their goal is to compete with current offerings from ATI and nVidia in both price and performance (which it is) then a dual GPU solution makes more sense, since you can use two slower, less expensive GPUs instead of one expensive one.Originally posted by: DurocShark
3dfx failed with the multiple GPU technique, why does nVidia think it's gonna work???? If they can't build a faster GPU, then I guess this is the only to compete?
Originally posted by: DurocShark
3dfx failed with the multiple GPU technique, why does nVidia think it's gonna work???? If they can't build a faster GPU, then I guess this is the only to compete?