going from 8 meg to 12 meg cache, and from 45nm to 32 nm ? And it costs $100 more ? Why do I care ???? What does that buy me.
going from 8 meg to 12 meg cache, and from 45nm to 32 nm ? And it costs $100 more ? Why do I care ???? What does that buy me.
going from 8 meg to 12 meg cache, and from 45nm to 32 nm ? And it costs $100 more ? Why do I care ???? What does that buy me.
given the size of his farm i highly doubt he cares about heat anymore lol. mark just needs something to give him as many PPD as possible![]()
Actually I do ! Thats why I am so happy with my new 1090T. It puts out more ppd than 2 of my best video cards with a fraction (like maybe even 1/4th) of the heat they put out.
Wouldn't a fermi crush a 1090T in ppd/w? The GTX480 is 300w... but it's like 5x the PPD rate of an OCed 1090T isn't it?
According to Mark's thread in distributing computing 4.1 Ghz 1090T will pull 16K.
That would put it above a Fermi if true. Which would be odd to say the least.
That would put it above a Fermi if true. Which would be odd to say the least.
![]()
There at the top of my list is my 1090T CPU. Is that enough proof ?
