scruffypup
Senior member
- Feb 3, 2006
- 371
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: Concillian
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: Quiksilver
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: Concillian
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
With 1deg C difference between ICD7 and AS5 there's no reason for me to think about using the harder to work with stuff. AS5 is a win because of how simple it is to use and clean up. At load with linpak it's a 1deg C difference that will not make or break an overclock and at idle it's .2deg C difference. Big deal really lol
There are plenty of people buying TRUEs instead of coolers that cost half as much and perform within a degree of each other. It makes more sense to buy a $15 tube of TIM or liquid metal pads to get that 1C benefit instead of $30 more on a cooler to get that same 1C. But many people opt for the cheaper paste and the expensive cooler.
Dunno why, probably that you can "see" the differences in the cooler, while the TIM is more "magic"
Um...where is a review of a cooler within 1c of a TRUE that is $30 cheaper?
No idea about where the review is now, but a Xigamatek S183 has been shown to be equal if not better than an unlapped TRUE... and it's only $22 AR (newegg)
One thing to say about that cooler. Push Pin retention :thumbsdown:
I'm not a fan of that method, it relies on the motherboard to support the weight of the HSF instead of a bracket braces behind it which the cooler screws into. I've seen those plastic clips break before.
Then buy a $5 thermalright bracket. IT's still around half the cost of the TRUE + fan, and it still makes more sense to go with expensive paste + cheap HSF to get that 1C because it's still cheaper. You're just defending it because you got the expensive cooler and cheap paste that doesn't make sense from a $$$ / performance standpoint.
Personally I went cheap AS5 and cheap cooler (with bolt through) because IMO neither is worth the 1C for an e7200.
You forget you can push+pull on the Thermalright and also that reviews like I linked to before, show the thermalright being better anyway.
again, AS5 is easy to clean up, and easy to apply. Not so for the other stuff
There are many reviews that show the Xigmatek S1283 is close to the TRUE,...
http://www.frostytech.com/top5heatsinks.cfm
http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=827
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article818-page1.html
are just some that give you and idea... now the TRUE for pure performance will get you a bit better,.. but so will the IFX-14 (and even better than the TRUE),... now consider you pay twice the amount for a very small gain on the TRUE, you have to buy a fan (so still twice as much if you want the retention bracket for the S1283).
The Vendetta 2 is also close,.. as it is a knockoff of the S1283.
THE MAIN DIFFERENCE,... is what type of fan you use and the noise you want.
The higher the airflow,.. the more the TRUE will shine,...and the noisier the system
If you want a budget system (not looking for extreme overclocks, but decent ones) and quietness,.. the s1283 will win since you spend less,... and running at lower airflows,... the S1283 is just as good (or better if going passive, see this page and chart at the bottom http://www.silentpcreview.com/article818-page5.html)
It always depends on what you are building for to what will be best,... but even going for high overclocks,.... the xiggy is a good bang for the buck
Back to original thread,... the mx-2 and tx-2 are just as good as AS5,... this was the 3rd review I have seen and those 3 tend to interchange positions and perform about the same,... at the high end of the scale
LINKS
http://benchmarkreviews.com/in...1&limit=1&limitstart=3
http://www.madshrimps.be/?acti...tpage=3071&articID=635