Matthias99
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2003
- 8,808
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: bradyapba
Originally posted by: Matthias99
Originally posted by: bradyapba
I get that Munky... and I see your point...
But if thats the case why didn't they put DDR in the 800's, which cost less than DDR3 memory? The 800 has DDR3... it makes no since to clock it at 700.. thats not nearly using the DDR3 to its potential.... if you were going to clock it at 700, you would use the cheaper DDR chips like the 6800 does?
There are multiple grades/speeds of GDDR3, as with most RAM. It's probably cheaper to buy slower GDDR3 than to design a new memory controller just so you can save a few bucks on the RAM (assuming that the X800 and X800XL cores are identical except for the different number of pipes).
Either that, or the cards are actually using regular DDR and the specs are wrong.
Ah, see these are the answers im looking for! I didn't know there was different levels of DDR3, and they mem controller idea, based off a standard board makes sense too! You guys are making me think I like it!
I orginally thought the specs were wrong![]()
Of course, now that I wrote that, digit-life reviewed the Gigabyte X800 and found that a) it uses 2.0ns GDDR3 (ie, rated for 500Mhz), and b) theirs came stock at 400/500(!). YMMV.
Apparently there were plans for a 128MB variant of the X800 using DDR1, but that may not happen? Very little solid info on different models of this card.
