Just 3dMark03/01 and aquamark but we can see the potencial of the new gen mid-range cards from ATi and Nvidia.
Edit: FORGOT THE LINK XD
Edit: FORGOT THE LINK XD
Originally posted by: Rollo
Well, that tells us nothing. 🙁
Can't play Aquamark or 3dmark.
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
still id side with nvidia for having the newer tech......ati still floggin that artx r300 design
Originally posted by: SneakyStuff
I've seen the review, but i'm still buying nVidia, simply for the feature set. I don't want last years technology, even if it does perform slightly better now. Because I just have this gut feeling that nVidia's driver team will be able to do more with the 6 series.
Originally posted by: Creig
From this initial bench, it doesn't look like there's a whole lot of overall performance difference between the X700XT and the X700Pro. They're certainly closer in performance to each other than the 6600GT/6600 are.
Originally posted by: Creig
Boy, I want to say I remember seeing that the the X700XT MSRP is going to be $249 and the X700 Pro will debut at $199, but I can't remember where.
Originally posted by: Creig
From this initial bench, it doesn't look like there's a whole lot of overall performance difference between the X700XT and the X700Pro. They're certainly closer in performance to each other than the 6600GT/6600 are.
Originally posted by: Concillian
That's because ATi will have three cards in this space and nVidia will have 2.
The x700 is the direct competitor to the 6600, not the x700 Pro. The x700 Pro just kind of hangs out in-between where the x700/6600 and x700 XT/ 6600 GT are.
The x700 Pro better have a significant performance advantage over the 6600 if it stands a chance in it's market segment.
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
still id side with nvidia for having the newer tech......ati still floggin that artx r300 design