x2 3600 rules sazakky
Senior member
How is this CPU at overclocking. Is it any good.
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Mine was stable @ 2.8GHz using an ACF 64 Pro and a Biostar tForce 550 SE. If you are looking at an X2 3600+, make sure you get the Brisbane model (65nm/1.9GHz/2x512KB), not the 90nm model (2.0GHz/2x256KB).
Originally posted by: error8
Oh, exactly. The 90nm model was quite bad at overclocking ( topping 2,6 ghz) and crippled by the 2x256 kb of level 2 cache. It was more like a dual core sempron if you like. 😉
Originally posted by: rogue1979
Originally posted by: error8
Oh, exactly. The 90nm model was quite bad at overclocking ( topping 2,6 ghz) and crippled by the 2x256 kb of level 2 cache. It was more like a dual core sempron if you like. 😉
The 90nm model is only socket 939, not AM2. They were only $48 at newegg at a time when dual cores were much more expensive. The 256K x 2 L2 cache did not suffer the same performance hit as a single core Sempron with 256K x 1.
I have a couple overclocked E2180 systems, as well as a socket 939 3600+ which I got with a Biostar M9 board ($99 shipped) that easily overclocked from 2.0GHz to 2.6GHz at 1.41v. It is still a decently powerful system, no Q6600 of course, but not as far behind a 3.0GHz+ C2D's as most people would like to think.
I would get the Brisbane 4200+ at newegg for $47.99 free shipping. An 11 multiplier should make it fairly easy to hit 3.0Ghz, which most of the newer 65nm Brisbanes seem to have a good shot at.