Excuse the long post: At the time of writing, it's late and I?m on my 3rd vodka and red bull?
My current rig is in the signature below (hopefully). However, amongst other things (which I shall not ask you, kind reader, about) I want to upgrade my GPU.
Some background: I use my PC primarily for work (MS Office), net-surfing, video and music. I?m happy with the current spec for all of that, and have no need to change anything (except for a few quieter fans and some cunning anti-dust technology).
However, I also use the PC for gaming. Nothing too serious, mind: I?m still playing Far Cry (sue me, it?s a stress reliever?), COD4, Sniper Elite, F.E.A.R, HALO, CS:S, Tiger Woods 2008 and Spider Solitaire, although not always at the same time (have you ever tried taking out a Trigen with a 9 iron in WWII Berlin while using 4 decks of cards? It?s bloody hard, I can tell you?). I will NOT be playing Crysis (did the Demo, didn?t like it), I?m hoping to play DiRT very soon, and I?m eagerly awaiting FarCry 2.
I have a bit of a budget to upgrade my PC, and will be looking to build in the next couple of months. My main aim is to maximise my graphics performance so that game play is smooth and beautifully rendered. And a cheap as possible, of course? I?m not into benchmarking against other people?s rigs (I don?t have enough money to be certain to win) and consequently, I?m not looking to build The World?s Bestest Ever Gaming Computer By Far.
I?m planning on upgrading to an Intel E8400, with a Thermalright Ultra Extreme CPU cooler, but sticking with my current PC2-6400 RAM which I hope to be able to run at 400 MHz to give 3.6 GHz CPU, with 1:1 FSB
RAM).
Now, to the whole raison d?etre of this post, and where I start to get a bit confused.
With my current set-up, and using my X1950 Pro, improving my graphics would mean going to Crossfire (which means a new motherboard and, to ensure PCIe bandwith isn?t limited, this seems to means an X38 or X48 board*), as well as an additional X1950 Pro. Total cost £260.26.
However, a PCIe 2.0 card (and I?m thinking Radeon HD 4850 here), using my current (PCIe 1.0) motherboard, would only cost £130.13. Note that is exactly half-price!
So, 2 x X1950 Pro in Crossfire on a PCIe 2.0 motherboard (Option 1) will cost me twice as much as a HD 4850 (PCIe 2.0 card) on my current (PCIe 1.0) motherboard (Option 2). Put that way, I'm begining to see the beginings of a flaw here...
Now, here?s the real (possibly stupid) question: will 2 x X1950 Pro in Crossfire on a PCIe 2.0 interface prove better than a single HD 4850 with PCIe 1.0 interface to the extent that it will offset the double price differential (I?m thinking not, given the reviews I?ve read) or would a single HD 4850 on my current motherboard just make me want to forget I ever owned an X1950 Pro?. Would I see any benefit in real day-to-day gaming terms? If the HD 4850 is the way to go, would upgrading to a PCIe 2.0 motherboard make any significant (and obvious) difference to me?
I?ve tried reading all the reviews (here and on other sites) but I must confess to being a bit slow when it comes to certain aspects of computer technology). And if I understood everything, I wouldn?t be asking for your assistance, would I?
I?m also slow at typing. I?m on my 5th vod and bed rule now?
Cheers.
T42
* If I?m going to change the motherboard, I?m going to go with PCIe 2.0. I can?t see any point in changing to anything less.
My current rig is in the signature below (hopefully). However, amongst other things (which I shall not ask you, kind reader, about) I want to upgrade my GPU.
Some background: I use my PC primarily for work (MS Office), net-surfing, video and music. I?m happy with the current spec for all of that, and have no need to change anything (except for a few quieter fans and some cunning anti-dust technology).
However, I also use the PC for gaming. Nothing too serious, mind: I?m still playing Far Cry (sue me, it?s a stress reliever?), COD4, Sniper Elite, F.E.A.R, HALO, CS:S, Tiger Woods 2008 and Spider Solitaire, although not always at the same time (have you ever tried taking out a Trigen with a 9 iron in WWII Berlin while using 4 decks of cards? It?s bloody hard, I can tell you?). I will NOT be playing Crysis (did the Demo, didn?t like it), I?m hoping to play DiRT very soon, and I?m eagerly awaiting FarCry 2.
I have a bit of a budget to upgrade my PC, and will be looking to build in the next couple of months. My main aim is to maximise my graphics performance so that game play is smooth and beautifully rendered. And a cheap as possible, of course? I?m not into benchmarking against other people?s rigs (I don?t have enough money to be certain to win) and consequently, I?m not looking to build The World?s Bestest Ever Gaming Computer By Far.
I?m planning on upgrading to an Intel E8400, with a Thermalright Ultra Extreme CPU cooler, but sticking with my current PC2-6400 RAM which I hope to be able to run at 400 MHz to give 3.6 GHz CPU, with 1:1 FSB
Now, to the whole raison d?etre of this post, and where I start to get a bit confused.
With my current set-up, and using my X1950 Pro, improving my graphics would mean going to Crossfire (which means a new motherboard and, to ensure PCIe bandwith isn?t limited, this seems to means an X38 or X48 board*), as well as an additional X1950 Pro. Total cost £260.26.
However, a PCIe 2.0 card (and I?m thinking Radeon HD 4850 here), using my current (PCIe 1.0) motherboard, would only cost £130.13. Note that is exactly half-price!
So, 2 x X1950 Pro in Crossfire on a PCIe 2.0 motherboard (Option 1) will cost me twice as much as a HD 4850 (PCIe 2.0 card) on my current (PCIe 1.0) motherboard (Option 2). Put that way, I'm begining to see the beginings of a flaw here...
Now, here?s the real (possibly stupid) question: will 2 x X1950 Pro in Crossfire on a PCIe 2.0 interface prove better than a single HD 4850 with PCIe 1.0 interface to the extent that it will offset the double price differential (I?m thinking not, given the reviews I?ve read) or would a single HD 4850 on my current motherboard just make me want to forget I ever owned an X1950 Pro?. Would I see any benefit in real day-to-day gaming terms? If the HD 4850 is the way to go, would upgrading to a PCIe 2.0 motherboard make any significant (and obvious) difference to me?
I?ve tried reading all the reviews (here and on other sites) but I must confess to being a bit slow when it comes to certain aspects of computer technology). And if I understood everything, I wouldn?t be asking for your assistance, would I?
I?m also slow at typing. I?m on my 5th vod and bed rule now?
Cheers.
T42
* If I?m going to change the motherboard, I?m going to go with PCIe 2.0. I can?t see any point in changing to anything less.