X1900XTX Benchmarks

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Methinks this is not a repost.

Over at Hexus, they have posted benchmarks with the X1900XT scoring 10,000 in 3DMark05. It should be more legit info than what they post at the inqwell. :)
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
Thanks, I just found it. Lazy today.

Scores look kinda shoddy.

X1900XT Crossfire only scoring 13,501? 7800GTX 512 SLI only scoring 12,200!? <----My GT SLI beats that score.

All on FX processors at 2.8GHZ?
 

Janooo

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2005
1,067
13
81
I see:

ATi RADEON X1900 XTX 512MB (650MHz VPU / 1550MHz GDDR-3) (AMD A64 FX-57 2.8GHz)
11,149 3DMarks
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Something looks borked with their numbers, or else ATi borked their card somehow.

Something looks borked with a bunch of their scores.

I posted this in the other thread too, but why does the 7900 score read "~13,000"???
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Something looks borked with their numbers, or else ATi borked their card somehow.

Something looks borked with a bunch of their scores.

I posted this in the other thread too, but why does the 7900 score read "~13,000"???

There is *another* thread?? :Q
 

Stoneburner

Diamond Member
May 29, 2003
3,491
0
76
I hope everybody remembers these are refresh products.

speaking of refreshes, the 9X00 series for ATI lasted about 18 months, the 9800xt was top dog for a year. I thought ATI and Nvidia were going to slow down their refresh cycles... but they are going faster than ever. ANyway, my x1800xl gets about 9000 3dmarks and can probably go higher if i put a zalman on it. Not impressed considering that 3dmark05 typically shows the biggest gains.

assuming the scores are correct.
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
These are like "Super" refreshes. When I think of typical refresh, I think core/memory clock bump and maybe more RAM. (7800GTX 512) :);):D
 

Munky

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2005
9,372
0
76
Where's Sander Sassen with his benchmarks?

Those score seem kinda low for a card with 3x more shaders than the r520.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: Stoneburner
I hope everybody remembers these are refresh products.
Let me refresh your memory: there has never been a refresh card released with triple the number of pixel shaders compared with it's predecessor.
 

schtuga

Member
Dec 22, 2005
106
0
0
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Something looks borked with their numbers, or else ATi borked their card somehow.

Something looks borked with a bunch of their scores.

I posted this in the other thread too, but why does the 7900 score read "~13,000"???


I thought the reason for the question marks is because it is the only one listed without an msrp.All the others have the score followed by the price.
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
Originally posted by: schtuga
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Something looks borked with their numbers, or else ATi borked their card somehow.

Something looks borked with a bunch of their scores.

I posted this in the other thread too, but why does the 7900 score read "~13,000"???


I thought the reason for the question marks is because it is the only one listed without an msrp.All the others have the score followed by the price.


I was talking about the "~". Approximately 13,000??

WHat does that mean? They were dreaming of 13,000? :)
 

schtuga

Member
Dec 22, 2005
106
0
0
sorry ,misunderstood,my bad.

And you are right ,all the others have a number and change,this just seems to be speculation of specs.
 

Steelski

Senior member
Feb 16, 2005
700
0
0
The scores should improve with dual core CPU's.

I think that this card will really be beating Nvidia this refresh. The memory speeds give it away....why on earth would the X1900 have 1550 speeds if it was not able to beat the Nvidia card with much higher speeds. Or perhaps we will see Nvidias cards and then ATI will bring out one with the same 1.1 memory. Although i was all for the rumoured 32pipe architecture of the R520 I am now thinking how the 16 pipe card performs so well.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Who freaking cares about ATI (and i use to be such a huge ATI fan) when the card won't even be available in the retail channel for months. By that time, there's going to be another 'new' card that is being released. The X1800 are just finally out there, and now there's the X1900?
 

John Reynolds

Member
Dec 6, 2005
119
0
0
Originally posted by: Looney
Who freaking cares about ATI (and i use to be such a huge ATI fan) when the card won't even be available in the retail channel for months. By that time, there's going to be another 'new' card that is being released. The X1800 are just finally out there, and now there's the X1900?

Sorry, but the X1800s were available when ATI said they would be. R520 was late, but other than that the launch itself wasn't handled as poorly as some past launches. There's very little reason to suggest that a refresh part will have poor availability at this point in time.

 

Steelski

Senior member
Feb 16, 2005
700
0
0
Originally posted by: Looney
Who freaking cares about ATI (and i use to be such a huge ATI fan) when the card won't even be available in the retail channel for months. By that time, there's going to be another 'new' card that is being released. The X1800 are just finally out there, and now there's the X1900?

Get with the times please. The X1800XL was available straight off and has not had stock issues and when the XT was released it ran short for only two weeks. All reports indicate that the new batch are already on their way to retailers and will be available in numbers.