• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

X1900XTX Benchmarks

S

SickBeast

Lifer
Methinks this is not a repost.

Over at Hexus, they have posted benchmarks with the X1900XT scoring 10,000 in 3DMark05. It should be more legit info than what they post at the inqwell. 🙂
 
Thanks, I just found it. Lazy today.

Scores look kinda shoddy.

X1900XT Crossfire only scoring 13,501? 7800GTX 512 SLI only scoring 12,200!? <----My GT SLI beats that score.

All on FX processors at 2.8GHZ?
 
I see:

ATi RADEON X1900 XTX 512MB (650MHz VPU / 1550MHz GDDR-3) (AMD A64 FX-57 2.8GHz)
11,149 3DMarks
 
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Something looks borked with their numbers, or else ATi borked their card somehow.
Click to expand...

Something looks borked with a bunch of their scores.

I posted this in the other thread too, but why does the 7900 score read "~13,000"???
 
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Something looks borked with their numbers, or else ATi borked their card somehow.
Click to expand...

Something looks borked with a bunch of their scores.

I posted this in the other thread too, but why does the 7900 score read "~13,000"???
Click to expand...

There is *another* thread?? :Q
 
I hope everybody remembers these are refresh products.

speaking of refreshes, the 9X00 series for ATI lasted about 18 months, the 9800xt was top dog for a year. I thought ATI and Nvidia were going to slow down their refresh cycles... but they are going faster than ever. ANyway, my x1800xl gets about 9000 3dmarks and can probably go higher if i put a zalman on it. Not impressed considering that 3dmark05 typically shows the biggest gains.

assuming the scores are correct.
 
These are like "Super" refreshes. When I think of typical refresh, I think core/memory clock bump and maybe more RAM. (7800GTX 512) 🙂😉😀
 
Where's Sander Sassen with his benchmarks?

Those score seem kinda low for a card with 3x more shaders than the r520.
 
Originally posted by: Stoneburner
I hope everybody remembers these are refresh products.
Click to expand...
Let me refresh your memory: there has never been a refresh card released with triple the number of pixel shaders compared with it's predecessor.
 
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Something looks borked with their numbers, or else ATi borked their card somehow.
Click to expand...

Something looks borked with a bunch of their scores.

I posted this in the other thread too, but why does the 7900 score read "~13,000"???
Click to expand...


I thought the reason for the question marks is because it is the only one listed without an msrp.All the others have the score followed by the price.
 
Originally posted by: schtuga
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Something looks borked with their numbers, or else ATi borked their card somehow.
Click to expand...

Something looks borked with a bunch of their scores.

I posted this in the other thread too, but why does the 7900 score read "~13,000"???
Click to expand...


I thought the reason for the question marks is because it is the only one listed without an msrp.All the others have the score followed by the price.
Click to expand...


I was talking about the "~". Approximately 13,000??

WHat does that mean? They were dreaming of 13,000? 🙂
 
sorry ,misunderstood,my bad.

And you are right ,all the others have a number and change,this just seems to be speculation of specs.
 
The scores should improve with dual core CPU's.

I think that this card will really be beating Nvidia this refresh. The memory speeds give it away....why on earth would the X1900 have 1550 speeds if it was not able to beat the Nvidia card with much higher speeds. Or perhaps we will see Nvidias cards and then ATI will bring out one with the same 1.1 memory. Although i was all for the rumoured 32pipe architecture of the R520 I am now thinking how the 16 pipe card performs so well.
 
Who freaking cares about ATI (and i use to be such a huge ATI fan) when the card won't even be available in the retail channel for months. By that time, there's going to be another 'new' card that is being released. The X1800 are just finally out there, and now there's the X1900?
 
Originally posted by: Looney
Who freaking cares about ATI (and i use to be such a huge ATI fan) when the card won't even be available in the retail channel for months. By that time, there's going to be another 'new' card that is being released. The X1800 are just finally out there, and now there's the X1900?
Click to expand...

Sorry, but the X1800s were available when ATI said they would be. R520 was late, but other than that the launch itself wasn't handled as poorly as some past launches. There's very little reason to suggest that a refresh part will have poor availability at this point in time.

 
Originally posted by: Looney
Who freaking cares about ATI (and i use to be such a huge ATI fan) when the card won't even be available in the retail channel for months. By that time, there's going to be another 'new' card that is being released. The X1800 are just finally out there, and now there's the X1900?
Click to expand...

Get with the times please. The X1800XL was available straight off and has not had stock issues and when the XT was released it ran short for only two weeks. All reports indicate that the new batch are already on their way to retailers and will be available in numbers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top