X1800XT 256Mb or XFX 7800GTX OC

McArra

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,295
0
0
I like X1800XT a lot, but I haven't seen 256mb version's review yet. So which would you buy (same price)...

X1800XT 256mb or XFX 7800GTX@490/1300 ??

No flamewars please!

Thanks
 

nts

Senior member
Nov 10, 2005
279
0
0
Originally posted by: McArra
I like X1800XT a lot, but I haven't seen 256mb version's review yet. So which would you buy (same price)...

X1800XT 256mb or XFX 7800GTX@490/1300 ??

No flamewars please!

Thanks

I would definately take the XT over the GTX,

Its generally faster
It has better AA (6x for the cost of 4x)
It has better AF (HQ angle independant), Better IQ
It has better Features (extremely efficient SM3)
etc...

I don't see why you wouldn't take the XT over the GTX at the same price, unless you dont want a dual slot cooler...

EDIT: Oh and no shimmering :)
 

Wreckage

Banned
Jul 1, 2005
5,529
0
0
Originally posted by: McArra
I like X1800XT a lot, but I haven't seen 256mb version's review yet. So which would you buy (same price)...

X1800XT 256mb or XFX 7800GTX@490/1300 ??

No flamewars please!

Thanks

Get the GTX. The only thing that really gave the XT the edge in some benchmarks was having 512mb of memory.

The GTX has...
Full support of SM3.0 including a Vertex Texture Fetch
More mature drivers
Better dual monitor support
Better OpenGL support
Generally less noisy and runs cooler
Better dual card solution
Better Warranty

Edit: Oh and ATI also has shimmering :)
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,566
15,686
146
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: McArra
I like X1800XT a lot, but I haven't seen 256mb version's review yet. So which would you buy (same price)...

X1800XT 256mb or XFX 7800GTX@490/1300 ??

No flamewars please!

Thanks

Get the GTX. The only thing that really gave the XT the edge in some benchmarks was having 512mb of memory.

The GTX has...
Full support of SM3.0 including a Vertex Texture Fetch
More mature drivers
Better dual monitor support
Better OpenGL support
Generally less noisy and runs cooler
Better dual card solution
Better Warranty

Edit: Oh and ATI also has shimmering :)


XT definately as basically everything Wreckage said was wrong.
 

aatf510

Golden Member
Nov 13, 2004
1,811
0
0
Originally posted by: Wreckage

Get the GTX. The only thing that really gave the XT the edge in some benchmarks was having 512mb of memory.

Not true, none of the games take advantage of the extra 256MB today, read AT reviews.

The x1800xt is a faster and better card, and there is a no question about it.
Only thing is that it cost more.
 

v8envy

Platinum Member
Sep 7, 2002
2,720
0
0
Both cards will give you nearly identical real-world performance, trading wins back and forth depending on game. In fact, if someone snuck in and replaced the card you bought with the other, you probably wouldn't notice judging by just the performance.

The XT is more interesting in terms of features, as mentioned above.

I'm curious, how much cheaper is it than a 512M version? I mean, when you're blowing about 500 bucks for a video card, what's mowing a few more lawns or working a few more hours to get the 512M version?

Since the whole point of a card like this is mind-blowing resolutions with 6xAA, the extra headroom of 512M would certainly be cheap future proofing insurance.


 

RobertR1

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2004
1,113
1
81
The x1800xt without a doubt. Better performance, better feature set, great OC potential and an extra 256MB of RAM. No need to find the x1800xt 256 when the 512MB card is already at a good price.
 

Spike

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2001
6,770
1
81
Originally posted by: RobertR1
The x1800xt without a doubt. Better performance, better feature set, great OC potential and an extra 256MB of RAM. No need to find the x1800xt 256 when the 512MB card is already at a good price.

I am curious why you say great oc potential? I see from your sig that yours oc'ed very well but my understanding was that this would be more the exception rather than the rule, is that not the case?

Personally I said "screw that" and paid $300 for a eVGA 7800GT that performs almost exactly on par with a stock speed GTX. Seemed good to me :)

-spike

EDIT* I just did a quick search using pricegrabber and it seems the cheapest X1800XT is $480 (512mb) and the cheapest 7800GTX is $450. If I had to choose between those two I would pay the few extra $ and get the X1800XT but I still stand by my saving $150 and getting the 7800GT. The few extra fps is not worth it to me. :)
 

nts

Senior member
Nov 10, 2005
279
0
0
Originally posted by: Spike
I am curious why you say great oc potential? I see from your sig that yours oc'ed very well but my understanding was that this would be more the exception rather than the rule, is that not the case?

There was an official bios leaked from Sapphire or Connect3D that gets any XT to 700Mhz core and 1600 memory. Sapphire is releasing the PE edition which is basically the normal XT with just the new BIOS.

I haven't heard of an XT yet that didn't hit 700 on stock cooling. AFAIK most go to around 740 on stock.
 

RobertR1

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2004
1,113
1
81
Originally posted by: Spike
Originally posted by: RobertR1
The x1800xt without a doubt. Better performance, better feature set, great OC potential and an extra 256MB of RAM. No need to find the x1800xt 256 when the 512MB card is already at a good price.

I am curious why you say great oc potential? I see from your sig that yours oc'ed very well but my understanding was that this would be more the exception rather than the rule, is that not the case?

Personally I said "screw that" and paid $300 for a eVGA 7800GT that performs almost exactly on par with a stock speed GTX. Seemed good to me :)

-spike

There is a thread or two on extremesystems.org and even some on hardforums about people flashing their x1800xt to x1800xt PE speeds of 700/1600. I'm sure a handful of cards won't like those speeds but majority of them seem to flash just fine (or you can just manually OC the card using Ati Tool). That was my reason. The 490/1300 cards don't seem to have a lot of OC'ing overhead left. My friend has a 7800GTX KO and the best we got was 497/1320 on the stock cooler.



 

Spike

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2001
6,770
1
81
Originally posted by: RobertR1
There is a thread or two on extremesystems.org and even some on hardforums about people flashing their x1800xt to x1800xt PE speeds of 700/1600. I'm sure a handful of cards won't like those speeds but majority of them seem to flash just fine (or you can just manually OC the card using Ati Tool). That was my reason. The 490/1300 cards don't seem to have a lot of OC'ing overhead left. My friend has a 7800GTX KO and the best we got was 497/1320 on the stock cooler.

Sounds like that card does very well, though I did not even know a X1800XT PE version was available. I'm curious now how much that would beat my eVGA 7800GT @ 470/1100. I wonder if the difference would be worth the $180... could be time to sell my new 7800GT to my brother ;)

-spike
 

RobertR1

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2004
1,113
1
81
Originally posted by: Spike
Originally posted by: RobertR1
There is a thread or two on extremesystems.org and even some on hardforums about people flashing their x1800xt to x1800xt PE speeds of 700/1600. I'm sure a handful of cards won't like those speeds but majority of them seem to flash just fine (or you can just manually OC the card using Ati Tool). That was my reason. The 490/1300 cards don't seem to have a lot of OC'ing overhead left. My friend has a 7800GTX KO and the best we got was 497/1320 on the stock cooler.

Sounds like that card does very well, though I did not even know a X1800XT PE version was available. I'm curious now how much that would beat my eVGA 7800GT @ 470/1100. I wonder if the difference would be worth the $180... could be time to sell my new 7800GT to my brother ;)

-spike

Supposedly the R580 will be launched at the end of January and nvidia's next flagship in Feb. If availability is anything like the 7800GTX512MB for either card(next to none) expect ridiculously high street prices. If your brother will pay you a good deal for it, it's definitely worth checking out. I'm quite happy with my purchase and for the games that I play, BF2 and CS:S, the x1800xt will do just fine for quite some time.



 

aatf510

Golden Member
Nov 13, 2004
1,811
0
0
Originally posted by: Spike
Sounds like that card does very well, though I did not even know a X1800XT PE version was available. I'm curious now how much that would beat my eVGA 7800GT @ 470/1100. I wonder if the difference would be worth the $180... could be time to sell my new 7800GT to my brother ;)

-spike

Yup because those are never XT PE by ATI definition. They are speed binned by third party manufacturer and released in special edition just like eVGA selling the GTX and GTX KO.
 

McArra

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,295
0
0
Finally decided to go with XFX 7800GT Gamer Edition, 120? cheaper and very beautifull. I'll live with that till DX10 generation arrives in 2006 ;)

Yhanks for the feedback, and very glad there was no flamewar ;)
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Originally posted by: Paratus
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: McArra
I like X1800XT a lot, but I haven't seen 256mb version's review yet. So which would you buy (same price)...

X1800XT 256mb or XFX 7800GTX@490/1300 ??

No flamewars please!

Thanks

Get the GTX. The only thing that really gave the XT the edge in some benchmarks was having 512mb of memory.

The GTX has...
Full support of SM3.0 including a Vertex Texture Fetch
More mature drivers
Better dual monitor support
Better OpenGL support
Generally less noisy and runs cooler
Better dual card solution
Better Warranty

Edit: Oh and ATI also has shimmering :)


XT definately as basically everything Wreckage said was wrong.

As usual.
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,003
126
Full support of SM3.0 including a Vertex Texture Fetch
Have you ever enabled this feature in games that support it? If so tell me, what was the performance like?

Not true, none of the games take advantage of the extra 256MB today, read AT reviews.
This is utter nonsense.