Originally posted by: McArra
I like X1800XT a lot, but I haven't seen 256mb version's review yet. So which would you buy (same price)...
X1800XT 256mb or XFX 7800GTX@490/1300 ??
No flamewars please!
Thanks
Originally posted by: McArra
I like X1800XT a lot, but I haven't seen 256mb version's review yet. So which would you buy (same price)...
X1800XT 256mb or XFX 7800GTX@490/1300 ??
No flamewars please!
Thanks
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: McArra
I like X1800XT a lot, but I haven't seen 256mb version's review yet. So which would you buy (same price)...
X1800XT 256mb or XFX 7800GTX@490/1300 ??
No flamewars please!
Thanks
Get the GTX. The only thing that really gave the XT the edge in some benchmarks was having 512mb of memory.
The GTX has...
Full support of SM3.0 including a Vertex Texture Fetch
More mature drivers
Better dual monitor support
Better OpenGL support
Generally less noisy and runs cooler
Better dual card solution
Better Warranty
Edit: Oh and ATI also has shimmering![]()
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Get the GTX. The only thing that really gave the XT the edge in some benchmarks was having 512mb of memory.
Originally posted by: RobertR1
The x1800xt without a doubt. Better performance, better feature set, great OC potential and an extra 256MB of RAM. No need to find the x1800xt 256 when the 512MB card is already at a good price.
Originally posted by: Spike
I am curious why you say great oc potential? I see from your sig that yours oc'ed very well but my understanding was that this would be more the exception rather than the rule, is that not the case?
Originally posted by: Spike
Originally posted by: RobertR1
The x1800xt without a doubt. Better performance, better feature set, great OC potential and an extra 256MB of RAM. No need to find the x1800xt 256 when the 512MB card is already at a good price.
I am curious why you say great oc potential? I see from your sig that yours oc'ed very well but my understanding was that this would be more the exception rather than the rule, is that not the case?
Personally I said "screw that" and paid $300 for a eVGA 7800GT that performs almost exactly on par with a stock speed GTX. Seemed good to me
-spike
Originally posted by: RobertR1
There is a thread or two on extremesystems.org and even some on hardforums about people flashing their x1800xt to x1800xt PE speeds of 700/1600. I'm sure a handful of cards won't like those speeds but majority of them seem to flash just fine (or you can just manually OC the card using Ati Tool). That was my reason. The 490/1300 cards don't seem to have a lot of OC'ing overhead left. My friend has a 7800GTX KO and the best we got was 497/1320 on the stock cooler.
Originally posted by: Spike
Originally posted by: RobertR1
There is a thread or two on extremesystems.org and even some on hardforums about people flashing their x1800xt to x1800xt PE speeds of 700/1600. I'm sure a handful of cards won't like those speeds but majority of them seem to flash just fine (or you can just manually OC the card using Ati Tool). That was my reason. The 490/1300 cards don't seem to have a lot of OC'ing overhead left. My friend has a 7800GTX KO and the best we got was 497/1320 on the stock cooler.
Sounds like that card does very well, though I did not even know a X1800XT PE version was available. I'm curious now how much that would beat my eVGA 7800GT @ 470/1100. I wonder if the difference would be worth the $180... could be time to sell my new 7800GT to my brother
-spike
Originally posted by: Spike
Sounds like that card does very well, though I did not even know a X1800XT PE version was available. I'm curious now how much that would beat my eVGA 7800GT @ 470/1100. I wonder if the difference would be worth the $180... could be time to sell my new 7800GT to my brother
-spike
Originally posted by: Paratus
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: McArra
I like X1800XT a lot, but I haven't seen 256mb version's review yet. So which would you buy (same price)...
X1800XT 256mb or XFX 7800GTX@490/1300 ??
No flamewars please!
Thanks
Get the GTX. The only thing that really gave the XT the edge in some benchmarks was having 512mb of memory.
The GTX has...
Full support of SM3.0 including a Vertex Texture Fetch
More mature drivers
Better dual monitor support
Better OpenGL support
Generally less noisy and runs cooler
Better dual card solution
Better Warranty
Edit: Oh and ATI also has shimmering![]()
XT definately as basically everything Wreckage said was wrong.
Have you ever enabled this feature in games that support it? If so tell me, what was the performance like?Full support of SM3.0 including a Vertex Texture Fetch
This is utter nonsense.Not true, none of the games take advantage of the extra 256MB today, read AT reviews.