- Jan 4, 2004
- 21,281
- 4
- 81
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articl...8800ultra-extreme.html
I've seen a ton of links to this in threads, but no thread for this review.
I think this review is one of the best HD 2900 XT vs. 8800 GTS/X comparisons we've seen thus far.
My thoughts:
-They use Vista for this review :thumbsup:
-They disable driver optimizations & use HQ settings for the drivers :thumbsup:
-Unless they made a typo in the testbed info, they use an OCed 8800 GTX (1900 MHz RAM vs. 1800 MHz):
I didn't even look at the lower resolutions, but at 1920x1200+, my observations:
-HD 2900 XT does extremely well compared to the 8800 GTX, besting it in a couple titles.
-HD 2900 XT does extremely poorly in a lot of the titles in the last half of the review, often below the X1950XTX's performance. :thumbsdown:
-Seems to me that there are a lot of games that need some ATi HD2900 driver fixing. :thumbsdown:
-8800 Ultras of any kind are a terrific waste of money :thumbsdown:
I've seen a ton of links to this in threads, but no thread for this review.
I think this review is one of the best HD 2900 XT vs. 8800 GTS/X comparisons we've seen thus far.
My thoughts:
-They use Vista for this review :thumbsup:
-They disable driver optimizations & use HQ settings for the drivers :thumbsup:
-Unless they made a typo in the testbed info, they use an OCed 8800 GTX (1900 MHz RAM vs. 1800 MHz):
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX (G80, 576/1350/1900MHz, 128sp, 32tmu, 24rop, 384-bit, 768MB)
I didn't even look at the lower resolutions, but at 1920x1200+, my observations:
-HD 2900 XT does extremely well compared to the 8800 GTX, besting it in a couple titles.
-HD 2900 XT does extremely poorly in a lot of the titles in the last half of the review, often below the X1950XTX's performance. :thumbsdown:
-Seems to me that there are a lot of games that need some ATi HD2900 driver fixing. :thumbsdown:
-8800 Ultras of any kind are a terrific waste of money :thumbsdown: