• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

wwyd?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I totally agree, but the cover and the back make it look like 2 totally different movies. The cover showed 2 hot young blonds sharing a penis. Porno movies you HAVE to look at the back, even then you can still be duped. The thing about this movie is based off the cover I wouldn't see any gay man picking it up. Porn employs so much trickery, it's no accident the cover doesn't show a man and a woman both scarfing on the same cock.

Oh, so it was the same video then? For some reason I misinterpreted the op as a case where he brings up a heterosexual cover mismatched to a bisexual/gay movie. In that case I think he probably knew exactly what he was looking for.

90 or close to it, he can hardly see, often times he'll give me way more money than his total thinking it's the right amount. He can hold the money an inch from his glasses and still give me the wrong amount, he does this every singlr time. He bought a dvd a few weeks ago. There was a female on the cover, on the back it was a full body pic of her and she had a penis. I know he couldn't have seen it, and I knew it wasn't what he wanted. But I thought since he's legally blind he'd enjoy it and be none the wiser. I doubt at that age he could fap anyways. I did consider telling him though.

And this just made me laugh. :awe:

Great thread.
 
he probably knew what he was looking for. Even if not, it's not your fault and pointing it out to customers might make them nervous.
 
Back
Top