WWI German soldiers found in perfectly preserved trenches where a shell buried them.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Waggy, even more interesting is the fact that they had 21 trenches buried at that site, with thousands of pounds of explosive in each. Of the 21, only 19 were actually triggered. One was set off by lightning in 1955, killing a cow in the process, and the last was discovered by the Germans and was never set off nor found after the explosion .. ITS STILL DOWN THERE !!
:eek:

I read a article how people in Europe have to be careful when they dig. It's not uncommon to find WW1 or WW2 ammunition.

Just the thought of one of these huge bombs under the ground ready to go off is insane.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
A greater tonnage of bombs were dropped during the Vietnam war than WW2. Think of how bad they have it.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
A greater tonnage of bombs were dropped during the Vietnam war than WW2. Think of how bad they have it.

It is the amount of unexploded ordance that is always the problem. The older the ordnance, the more unstable it is.
 

fatpat268

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2006
5,853
0
71
The more I read about WWI, the more I realize that I can't possibly fathom the scale of that war. WWI gets kind of skipped over in schools so they can cover WWII quicker, but I actually find WWI more fascinating.

Alone this quote from the wiki page on the Battle of Messines fascinates me:

In the week before the attack, some 2,230 guns bombarded the German trenches and conducted counter-battery fire against the 630 German guns and howitzers (236 field guns, 108 field howitzers, 54 100mm&#8212;130mm guns, 24 150mm guns, 174 medium howitzers, 40 heavy howitzers and four heavy 210mm and 240mm guns) with 3,561,530 shells.

O_O
 

Gooberlx2

Lifer
May 4, 2001
15,381
6
91
The more I read about WWI, the more I realize that I can't possibly fathom the scale of that war. WWI gets kind of skipped over in schools so they can cover WWII quicker, but I actually find WWI more fascinating.

Alone this quote from the wiki page on the Battle of Messines fascinates me:



O_O

There's pretty insane footage from this series on youtube about the battle of Verdun. When they perfecting rolling barrages, they were absolutely devastating.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
I read a article how people in Europe have to be careful when they dig. It's not uncommon to find WW1 or WW2 ammunition.

Just the thought of one of these huge bombs under the ground ready to go off is insane.

I'm Belgian, farmers here are digging up tons of ammunition every year. If you walk around the fields, it's not unusual to find ammo, including nasty chemical ammunition. The bigger ones are detonated in the North Sea, happens all the time. The problem is still so big that the Belgian army build a processing facility, they destroy more then 200 ton of ammo every year.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi7qgL5pMaA

In this thread from a Belgian forum you can find some good pics, including one from a farmer plowing on a fosfor grenade

http://www.militair.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1837&p=45269

to give you an idea, this is a normal sight when you walk in the area, farmers put them on the side of the road so the army can pick them up
we have learned not to too touch anything


file.php
 
Last edited:

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
yeah the article i read had pictures like that. i thought it was rather insane.
 

fatpat268

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2006
5,853
0
71
There's pretty insane footage from this series on youtube about the battle of Verdun. When they perfecting rolling barrages, they were absolutely devastating.

Thanks for that, just watched it all. Fascinating stuff.

Makes you wonder how anyone survived when they shelled almost every square foot of land.
 

Gooberlx2

Lifer
May 4, 2001
15,381
6
91
Thanks for that, just watched it all. Fascinating stuff.

Makes you wonder how anyone survived when they shelled almost every square foot of land.

The numbers are just staggering. Something like 2.5 million shells for 1100+ artillery guns of various types on the German side alone. 700,000+ casualties from both sides....for one battle.

I mean, I know that the numbers still don't top certain battles in WWII, like Stalingrad. But even so, it's just insane the carnage, conditions and misery of WWI. I think the whole trench warfare and no man's land tactics just seem more visually awful.
 
Last edited:

Rudee

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
11,218
2
76
A thread about perfectly preserved soldiers that shows absolutely no pics of said soldiers makes this thread a fail.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
The numbers are just staggering. Something like 2.5 million shells for 1100+ artillery guns of various types on the German side alone. 700,000+ casualties from both sides....for one battle.

I mean, I know that the numbers still don't top certain battles in WWII, like Stalingrad. But even so, it's just insane the carnage, conditions and misery of WWI. I think the whole trench warfare and no man's land tactics just seem more visually awful.

I thought ww1 had a larger soldier death toll?
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
I have 2 pics from ww1 I got from my grandfather who was a Pfc bugler. 1St pic is of germans in no mans land with a German body half way in a shell hole. The sec is with German pow's with their hands up with amrtican soldiers with fixed bayonets. Guarding them.
 
Last edited:

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,320
126
wow, stay classy there buddy. you don't seem to like any posts that
have anything to do with the middle east or islam. your warped
view on these topics have been made known in P&N, where
everyone knew what type of one-sided 'mod' you were.
amdhunter and I are about 10 steps above you - and that's saying a
lot. it is past time to grow up, EK. do it. :\


So you agree with what amdhunter posted?
Both you and amdhunter love to troll and derail threads with nonsense that you cannot prove.

Why amdhunter is allowed to post such unprovable nonsense is beyond human understanding!

This is OT...so I guess there are no hard and fast rules about being able to back up your claims.......sounds like your type of forum to post in Sandeagle...lol
 
Last edited:

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
Something like 30% of the shells the British fired in the early part of the war did not detonate.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
i just read the story again and man oh man i wish i could go and see this site for myself.
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
I like watching current film of the french countryside where you can see so many portions of the land still in the disfigured formation of constructed defensive positions and from shell explosions, just now with decades of grass and vegetation grown back over the disturbed spoil. Really amazing to see how. Much was changed and how long it has. Still lasted.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
lol im sure he hauled ass away from that pretty damn fast. bet the tractor was still idling in the picture.

the farmers here have become really good at identifying the dangerous from the less dangerous. The chemical ones are usually not that dangerous anymore because of the decaying of the chemical agent inside. HE shells are the real danger
 

Gooberlx2

Lifer
May 4, 2001
15,381
6
91
Last edited: