WTH: No 007 Bond movie for year 2007?

[JEDI]

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: Fritzo
What? They just had one in 2006. How fast you think they can work?

I'm thinking they should work damn fast and release a 007 movie in a year that ends with 007?

after 06/06/06, and 07/07/07, the next thing that popped in my mind was a Bond movie in 2007 is a no brainer.

i guess a dumbass is in charge of their marketing dept.

 

[FreshPrince]

Originally posted by: JEDI

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: Fritzo
What? They just had one in 2006. How fast you think they can work?

I'm thinking they should work damn fast and release a 007 movie in a year that ends with 007?

after 06/06/06, and 07/07/07, the next thing that popped in my mind was a Bond movie in 2007 is a no brainer.

i guess a dumbass is in charge of their marketing dept.

exactly...

also, I heard that the next bond will be a sequel to casino royale

 

[Zim Hosein]

Originally posted by: Maleficus

Originally posted by: Zim Hosein

Originally posted by: Maleficus
Craig sucks as bond and royale was horrible, I wouldn't be in a rush to make another sucky movie either.

I completely disagree w/ you 100%! I liked Craig as Bond and thought that Royale was a frest take on 007. Out of curiosity, did you like Craig in Layer Cake Maleficus?

Yes. I enjoyed Layer Cake.

So you just think that Craig was miscast as bond then, okay.

 

[Syringer]

Too much poker playing in Casino Royale. WTF wants to watch people playing fictional poker in an action movie?

 

[Alone]

Originally posted by: Syringer
Too much poker playing in Casino Royale. WTF wants to watch people playing fictional poker in an action movie?

Re-read the film title and get back to me.

 

[OulOat]

Originally posted by: Alone

Originally posted by: Syringer
Too much poker playing in Casino Royale. WTF wants to watch people playing fictional poker in an action movie?

Re-read the film title and get back to me.

And they played bad poker. Bond was called at the end, he should have shown his cards first, not last.

 

[FreshPrince]

Originally posted by: OulOat

Originally posted by: Alone

Originally posted by: Syringer
Too much poker playing in Casino Royale. WTF wants to watch people playing fictional poker in an action movie?

Re-read the film title and get back to me.

And they played bad poker. Bond was called at the end, he should have shown his cards first, not last.

all in!

oh wait, and my car keys too! :shocked:

 

[thepd7]

Originally posted by: Chadder007

Originally posted by: Bateluer

Originally posted by: Maleficus
Craig sucks as bond and royale was horrible, I wouldn't be in a rush to make another sucky movie either.

QFT.

Craig was terrible and Royale was one of the worst Bond movies I've ever seen, down there with Die Another Day.

It was close, but the movie didn't really have Bond feel too it. And im comparing it to the Connery movies.

It follows the book. Since the movies were based on the character in the books and this one followed the first book then it actually has to most Bond feel to it. It sets up the Connery movies and character you are talking about.

 

[CalvinHobbs]

Originally posted by: Maleficus
Craig sucks as bond and royale was horrible, I wouldn't be in a rush to make another sucky movie either.

have not bothered to watch it, he doen't look like a James Bond

 

[Zap]

Originally posted by: Chadder007

Originally posted by: Bateluer
Craig was terrible and Royale was one of the worst Bond movies I've ever seen, down there with Die Another Day.

It was close, but the movie didn't really have Bond feel too it.

The problem is the opening of the movie didn't have that "Bond feel" because it wasn't silhouettes of women. 😛

 

[jadinolf]

I don't know but I want to be the next Bond.

 

[mercanucaribe]

Craig looks a lot like Connery.

 

[sdifox]

My prediction is that there will be not one but TWO 007 Films... As in 2 007 🙂

 

[Beau]

Fine by me... After I heard that the Olsen twins are gonna be the next Bond girls, I think I'll be passing on the next installment.