WTH, FDISK builds only 8.066GB partition, then...

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
This is on a 9.11GB scsi drive and FDISK only builds a 8.066GB partition (something like that), then once I format the disk and install win2k, when I go into the computer management / diskmanager, it shows 722Mb of unallocated space. I can then format that, but end up with another partion. Why is it not being defined all the way in FDISK? The board bioses should handle that size. Tried two boards, which are P2B and Supermicro P6SBA. I even tried the IBM drive install utility, just in case. :Q
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
4
81
[*]tried deleting any non-dos partitions?
[*]low level format the drive
[*]no need to use fdisk if you are installing 2K/XP....you can create/delete partitions and format
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
I would kill the MBR on the drive (I'd use IBM's zap if it was an IDE disk, but I'm not sure if it will work on a SCSI disk) & then boot off the 2K CD & let the installation handle everything.

Viper GTS
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
That's why I am surprised to see me asking this question. :Q I've done all the usual stuff guys. It just doesn't make sense.
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
4
81
You did a low level format and there is still a hidden partition?

DEBUG is another option.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
I'm gonna blow the partitions out again, then try just letting Win2k install it again, and leave the partitioning and formatting all up to Win2k. So far,
I have :
Fdisked and formatted
Low level formatted
Tried tried using the IBM disk setup utility, but it gives same formatted size as fdisk.

The only thing I did not do, is let Win2k handle it, since I figured I'd get the same result....but like they say, never assume. ;)

Now if the raid array I am rebuilding from raid 5 to raid 0 would hurry up, I can get on with this. Damn, that takes along time!

I wonder if there are other nuts that sit around working on computers this late at night? :p
 

DSTA

Senior member
Sep 26, 2001
431
0
0
I wonder if this is not a problem with either the SCSI host adapter BIOS or more probably the version of fdisk used. Was that an older DOS fdisk?
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
Actually, the scsi host adapter used is an Adaptec AHA-2940W, but it is only being used for testing purposes, until the mobo, which has an onboard U160 controller is here, mid week. For now, all I am doing is testing drives and controllers, as well as the raid system that is going in it. It's all just kinda hooked up on the bench right now.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
Update: Letting the Win2k installation handle it all, got me 8738mb, which is more like it. :)
 

Mrburns2007

Platinum Member
Jun 14, 2001
2,595
0
0
I would have formatted the unused space and merged the partition.............partition commander rules!
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
4
81


<< until the mobo, which has an onboard U160 controller is here, mid week. >>



Tyan Thunder K7? :):)
 

BIGGDOG

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2000
1,400
0
71
Steve. I can not tell you why this happens but by letting the Win 2000 setup do it for you has been a solution for me in the past.

Even when I bought Win XP I let the OS handle it for me.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126


<< Tyan Thunder K7? :):) >>



Sorry, it's an Intel / Supermicro rig. It's for someone else, not me...even gets Rambus. He just brought me all the parts, without prior consultation. :Q