• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

WTF! Reuters reporters have been reading too many message boards.

Originally posted by: PipBoy
baby pigs on highway

"If these had been full-grown hogs, they would have gone ballistic," Watson said. "We would of had to shoot them." (emphasis added)

That really pisses me off to see 4th grade internet grammar on CNN.

I don't see what the problem is, seeing that they're qouting someone else. The reporter himself didn't make the mistake, he's just qouting someone else.

 
Originally posted by: OS
Originally posted by: PipBoy
baby pigs on highway

"If these had been full-grown hogs, they would have gone ballistic," Watson said. "We would of had to shoot them." (emphasis added)

That really pisses me off to see 4th grade internet grammar on CNN.

I don't see what the problem is, seeing that they're qouting someone else. The reporter himself didn't make the mistake, he's just qouting someone else.

He's quoting someone's spoken words. No matter how dumbly you say "would of" or "would've", a reporter should know the right way to write it.
 
Originally posted by: PipBoy
baby pigs on highway

"If these had been full-grown hogs, they would have gone ballistic," Watson said. "We would of had to shoot them." (emphasis added)

That really pisses me off to see 4th grade internet grammar on CNN.

I'm with you on this one. Makes one wonder what credentials these guys have.
 
Originally posted by: PipBoy
Originally posted by: OS
Originally posted by: PipBoy
baby pigs on highway

"If these had been full-grown hogs, they would have gone ballistic," Watson said. "We would of had to shoot them." (emphasis added)

That really pisses me off to see 4th grade internet grammar on CNN.

I don't see what the problem is, seeing that they're qouting someone else. The reporter himself didn't make the mistake, he's just qouting someone else.

He's quoting someone's spoken words. No matter how dumbly you say "would of" or "would've", a reporter should know the right way to write it.

"Would have" would of been better. 😉
 
Back
Top