- May 9, 2004
- 48
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: anarchistjon
OMG LOOK....NEVER HEARD OF THIS B4.....ERROR???
CLICK!
GOO LOOK!!!!
512K CACHE ON A 2200+.....1.35v??????? WTF!.....if this is true...im getting this instead of a 2400+ mobile....
if it is so, then that would be good. you might pay less for an equalent chip of higher clock..Originally posted by: Zebo
Almost all moblie bartons can do this speed at 1.35.
Originally posted by: PorBleemo
OMG...MAYBE THIS IS ALIEN TECHNOLOGY? I REALLY DON'T KNOW! BUT HEY IT'S GOT A LOWER VOLTAGE SO IT MUST BE WORSE!!!![]()
Originally posted by: DaNorthface
he doesn't mean the cpu is crap, he's saying it must be an error.. otherwise, why would he get one for himself??
i don't see the 2400 but one guy got the 2200+XP-M and only overclocked to 2.2 ghzOriginally posted by: xylem
For those who are interested, here's a link to a Swedish overclocking site that has quite a few reports from people with the 2400+ variety of this chip (AXMD2400FJQ4C):
Info
At a glance, they appear to be overclocking to a slightly higher level than the 1.45V counterparts, and hopefully this is an indication of good things from the 2200+.
Originally posted by: anarchistjon
heard these 35 watters are kick ass for overclocking...that one guy got to 3500mhz with a 2400+ 35 watter
?
Originally posted by: DaNorthface
i don't see the 2400 but one guy got the 2200+XP-M and only overclocked to 2.2 ghzOriginally posted by: xylem
For those who are interested, here's a link to a Swedish overclocking site that has quite a few reports from people with the 2400+ variety of this chip (AXMD2400FJQ4C):
Info
At a glance, they appear to be overclocking to a slightly higher level than the 1.45V counterparts, and hopefully this is an indication of good things from the 2200+.