CrackRabbit
Lifer
- Mar 30, 2001
- 16,642
- 62
- 91
Do you have anything to contribute to the thread or not?
Do you have anything to contribute to this forum besides poorly thought out rants about Obama and gays?
Do you have anything to contribute to the thread or not?
Bush was unpopular among liberals and libertarians. Personally I think it's hilarious that Obama doubled down on the topics that most enraged these groups. NSA, patriot act, drones. Combined with his anti gun policy and petulant mewlings regarding marijuana Obama is the least freedom loving president we have had.
Do you have anything to contribute to this forum besides poorly thought out rants about Obama and gays?
Since you do not have anything to contribute to this thread would you please leave.
All countries are weak not because of weak leaders, but because we're so interdependent. If we turn off the economy of Russia, they could just turn off the gas to Europe. Why do you think we never really stood up to China over Tibet?
We have NATO obligations with some of those former Soviet countries that are also hugely ethnic Russian. It's all tribalism, but could it start WWIII?
TH still thinks Ukraine is aiming to become a member of the EU, or that the EU would ever want The Ukraine as a member.
Bush was unpopular?
Wow, when did that happen?
Man, the right wing really wants to elect Putin with they way they fellate him.
True, and well said. Although I don't think FDR was on balance a bad President, just bad on specific things.Debate you on what exactly? The fact that you Godwin'ed the thread?
Can't do that, your post speaks for itself there.
That G.W. Bush and Carter were unpopular at the time their successors were elected. Pretty sure that is factual too.
If you want a debate, chew on this for a bit.
While Nixon and Franklin Roosevelt were bad presidents in many ways, so were the good ones.
Eisenhower is generally regarded as a 'good' president, yet did nothing to stem the growing racial disparity that lead to the riots of the 60s.
Even the almighty Reagan himself had the Iran-Contra scandal and numerous excursions into South America.
All of them are humans, and imperfect and must make due with the situations they are dealt with.
LOL +1Hitler had brown hair and Obama has brown hair. Coincidence? :hmm:
Yeah, I'd think it was hilarious except it's actually happening. Kind of takes the humor out of it for me.Bush was unpopular among liberals and libertarians. Personally I think it's hilarious that Obama doubled down on the topics that most enraged these groups. NSA, patriot act, drones. Combined with his anti gun policy and petulant mewlings regarding marijuana Obama is the least freedom loving president we have had.
Yes it is.
We as a nation are divided. As such, we are on a downward trend of electing weak leaders.
Bush was unpopular?
Wow, when did that happen?
I read two words of the headline "Peggy Noonan:". That was all I needed to read.
What is our foreign policy? Disliking global warming?
lol Peggy Noonan.
So, is that your rebuttal? If you have nothing to contribute why are you posting?
The name of the author does not change the facts.
Putin is a sly fox.
To counter that fox the American people elected a puppy who is running around with no idea what he is doing.
So, is that your rebuttal? If you have nothing to contribute why are you posting?
The name of the author does not change the facts.
Putin is a sly fox.
To counter that fox the American people elected a puppy who is running around with no idea what he is doing. While our puppy dog president is playing with his toys and licking his balls, the fox is sneaking into the chicken house.
The American people got what they deserved with obama.
Of course the name of the author matters. Peggy Noonan's "analysis" is renowned to be among the stupidest, most vacuous, and most frequently wrong of anyone writing today.
When someone is wrong -literally- almost all the time, sooner or later a wise person stops listening to them.
Man, the right wing really wants to elect Putin with they way they fellate him.
Does not change the fact that the people of the United States elected a community organizer, while Russia has a strong leader.
Instead of electing real leaders, our divided nation are electing people who talk the good talk. Gays and femenist would rather vote for someone who supports gay rights and abortion than someone who is a real leader. Children of illegal immigrants would rather vote for someone who talks about amensity than someone who is able to deal with Iran, Russia and Syria.
Our history of electing weaklings into position of authority is going to come back and bite us in the ass.
lol. Doesn't change the "fact" that is entirely your opinion.
Does not change the fact that the people of the United States elected a community organizer, while Russia has a strong leader.
Instead of electing real leaders, our divided nation are electing people who talk the good talk. Gays and femenist would rather vote for someone who supports gay rights and abortion than someone who is a real leader. Children of illegal immigrants would rather vote for someone who talks about amensity than someone who is able to deal with Iran, Russia and Syria.
Our history of electing weaklings into position of authority is going to come back and bite us in the ass.
