Wrongly Convicted Man Sued for Child Support

[michaelsslave]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: JDMnAR1
And as far as the poster who says that no child support is due because there was no order in place - nice try. A friend of mine was recently served with papers for delinquent child support on a child that he did not know he had, and who was about to turn 18. The mother, peach of a woman that she was, elected not to tell him that she was pregnant and eventually had his child. She waited until the child was 17+ and filed in hopes of getting a nice lump sum payment, which of course she did.

Man, that's effed up.

What if a guy was drugged (date rape drug) and then raped (let's say some chick rides him like sea biscuit and gets pregnant). Given the way laws are, I bet she'd be able to get child support, right?

i would think if it could be proven that is was rape, then the guy wouldnt have to pay anything

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: manowar821

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: JDMnAR1
And as far as the poster who says that no child support is due because there was no order in place - nice try. A friend of mine was recently served with papers for delinquent child support on a child that he did not know he had, and who was about to turn 18. The mother, peach of a woman that she was, elected not to tell him that she was pregnant and eventually had his child. She waited until the child was 17+ and filed in hopes of getting a nice lump sum payment, which of course she did.

Man, that's effed up.

What if a guy was drugged (date rape drug) and then raped (let's say some chick rides him like sea biscuit and gets pregnant). Given the way laws are, I bet she'd be able to get child support, right?

its even worse then that. i seem to recall that a sperm donor got nailed for child support.

You're kidding, right..? Jesus, maybe I'll think twice about being nice and doing a donation, then.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271116,00.html


HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania ? A sperm donor who helped a lesbian couple conceive two children is liable for child support under a state appellate court ruling that a legal expert believes might be the first of its kind in the U.S.

A Superior Court panel last week ordered a Dauphin County judge to establish how much Carl L. Frampton Jr. would have to pay to the birth mother of the 8-year-old boy and 7-year-old girl.

"I'm unaware of any other state appellate court that has found that a child has, simultaneously, three adults who are financially obligated to the child's support and are also entitled to visitation," said New York Law School professor Arthur S. Leonard, an expert on sexuality and the law.

 

[mugs]

Originally posted by: manowar821

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: JDMnAR1
And as far as the poster who says that no child support is due because there was no order in place - nice try. A friend of mine was recently served with papers for delinquent child support on a child that he did not know he had, and who was about to turn 18. The mother, peach of a woman that she was, elected not to tell him that she was pregnant and eventually had his child. She waited until the child was 17+ and filed in hopes of getting a nice lump sum payment, which of course she did.

Man, that's effed up.

What if a guy was drugged (date rape drug) and then raped (let's say some chick rides him like sea biscuit and gets pregnant). Given the way laws are, I bet she'd be able to get child support, right?

its even worse then that. i seem to recall that a sperm donor got nailed for child support.

You're kidding, right..? Jesus, maybe I'll think twice about being nice and doing a donation, then.

I believe the situation Waggy is referring to involved a guy who was a sperm donor for a lesbian couple, and he had an active role in the kid's life. I don't know the details of the case, so I don't know how active he was or how close his role was to that of a father. I think he was also dead and they sued his estate.

 

[Xavier434]

Originally posted by: JDMnAR1

Yes - lump sum. He has his own business, so there was no paycheck to deduct from. He was given a choice - have $xxxxx dollars paid by a set date, or go to jail.

Well, at least he had the money.

 

[michaelsslave]

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: manowar821

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: JDMnAR1
And as far as the poster who says that no child support is due because there was no order in place - nice try. A friend of mine was recently served with papers for delinquent child support on a child that he did not know he had, and who was about to turn 18. The mother, peach of a woman that she was, elected not to tell him that she was pregnant and eventually had his child. She waited until the child was 17+ and filed in hopes of getting a nice lump sum payment, which of course she did.

Man, that's effed up.

What if a guy was drugged (date rape drug) and then raped (let's say some chick rides him like sea biscuit and gets pregnant). Given the way laws are, I bet she'd be able to get child support, right?

its even worse then that. i seem to recall that a sperm donor got nailed for child support.

You're kidding, right..? Jesus, maybe I'll think twice about being nice and doing a donation, then.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271116,00.html


HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania ? A sperm donor who helped a lesbian couple conceive two children is liable for child support under a state appellate court ruling that a legal expert believes might be the first of its kind in the U.S.

A Superior Court panel last week ordered a Dauphin County judge to establish how much Carl L. Frampton Jr. would have to pay to the birth mother of the 8-year-old boy and 7-year-old girl.

"I'm unaware of any other state appellate court that has found that a child has, simultaneously, three adults who are financially obligated to the child's support and are also entitled to visitation," said New York Law School professor Arthur S. Leonard, an expert on sexuality and the law.

after reading the article i gotta agree with the lezbos. the guy acted like a father to them and the kids even called him dad.

 

[JDMnAR1]

Originally posted by: Xavier434

Originally posted by: JDMnAR1

Yes - lump sum. He has his own business, so there was no paycheck to deduct from. He was given a choice - have $xxxxx dollars paid by a set date, or go to jail.

Well, at least he had the money.

Actually, he didn't. Owning your own business =/= having money. He busted his ass to keep it out of jail, and borrowed some too.