• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Wrongfully convicted man denied pardon

ironcrotch

Diamond Member
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/08/18/refused.pardon.ap/index.html
RALEIGH, North Carolina (AP) -- Gov. Mike Easley has refused to pardon a man he sent to prison when he was a prosecutor even though the man was freed after the victims recanted their testimony.

Easley denied the petition of Sylvester Smith, 54, who was convicted in 1984 for first degree rape and two counts of first degree sexual offense, the governor's office said Wednesday.

At the same time, however, the governor pardoned Leo Waters, 56, of New Bern, who served 21 years in prison for a 1981 rape and was freed based on new DNA evidence.

A pardon in North Carolina allows a wrongfully convicted person to seek $20,000 a year from the state for each year the person was imprisoned, up to $500,000.

Smith said Easley had a conflict of interest because he prosecuted the case when he was district attorney in Brunswick County. "I don't think he's man enough to say he made a mistake," Smith said.

A judge ordered Smith released from prison in November. The accusers, who were 5 and 6 at the time of the trial, recanted their earlier testimony and said their grandmother told them to say Smith was responsible for the abuse rather than their 9-year-old cousin. The cousin, who can't be prosecuted because of his age at the time of the crime, is serving a life prison sentence for murder. The grandmother has died.

Smith won a new trial and a prosecutor dismissed the charges.

The governor issued a statement saying his decision was based on a review of the 1984 trial transcript and a recently completed inquiry by the State Bureau of Investigation.

There is no appeal of Easley's decision. Smith's attorney, Roy Trest, said he would file a new petition with the next governor in 2009.

In the other case, Waters was cleared of his rape conviction after a DNA test conducted in 2003. District Attorney Dewey Hudson dismissed charges against Waters more than year ago and a grand jury indicted a Massachusetts prison inmate in the case Tuesday.

Waters had been convicted in a March 31, 1981, attack on a Jacksonville woman.

DNA taken from the victim and the crime scene was compared to samples in a national registry and matched that of Joel Bill Caulk, 58, serving time in Massachusetts for rape and robbery, Jacksonville Police Detective Len Condry said.

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

So he was cleared of charges and denied pardon? So what's he in jail for then? I don't get it.
 
Less the legal system, more pride. Dickwad doesn't want to admit he's wrong, although it's screaming at him in front of his face.
 
He doesn't have to admit he's wrong cuz he was. You can't just keep the guy in jail, he's been in there for 25 years.
 
I'm sure it'll go to the Supreme Court. At that point, maybe the moron will get kicked out of office.
 
Originally posted by: ironcrotch
He doesn't have to admit he's wrong cuz he was. You can't just keep the guy in jail, he's been in there for 25 years.

He's not in jail anymore. He wants the pardon for the restitution it would provide him for the time he served.
 
I think the people who recanted their testimony are the ones who belong behind bars :|

That's just sick, but its the world we live in
 
Originally posted by: Ronin
I'm sure it'll go to the Supreme Court. At that point, maybe the moron will get kicked out of office.

I think the guys free, but the ass isnt giving him a pardon.
 
Originally posted by: ironcrotch
He doesn't have to admit he's wrong cuz he was. You can't just keep the guy in jail, he's been in there for 25 years.


A judge ordered Smith released from prison in November.

He's out of jail, but he can't sue for compensation until his pardon goes thru.

EDIT: I'm glad I'm not the only one who reads.
 
Guys, the guy has been released. He is not in jail. A pardon is a different thing, and the reason the governor probably does not want to grant it is becasue of the 20K a year the guy will get or possibly he still believes the guy might be guilty....
 
Originally posted by: acemcmac
I think the people who recanted their testimony are the ones who belong behind bars :|

That's just sick, but its the world we live in

they were 5 and 6, they don't know any better.
 
OMG! WTF!

This man has live most of his life in prison by a man who has too much pride to admit he was wrong. I would love to hear his reason why he won't pardon this poor man. Imagine most of your life thrown away, and now you have a chance to live the latter years of your life a free man but one person is holding you back from moving on with your life.

This reminds me of that movie with Eddie Murphy and Martin Lawrence, "LIFE"
 
Originally posted by: acemcmac
I think the people who recanted their testimony are the ones who belong behind bars :|

That's just sick, but its the world we live in

They were 5 and 6 years old, If I was on a jury it would take a lot and i mean a lot of to make be belive what a 5 or 6 year old saying was true.

 
Originally posted by: ironcrotch
Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

So what's he in jail for then? I don't get it.[/quote]

Copyright violations.

 
I hope the former inmate sues and gets a boatload of cash. I also hope the governor gets booted and his political career is ruined forever.
 
Originally posted by: acemcmac
I think the people who recanted their testimony are the ones who belong behind bars :|

That's just sick, but its the world we live in


they were little girls.. age 5 and 6 that were apparently raped by their 9 year old cousin. it was their grandma who told them to accuse the man who's now in prison. hence their recant... which i don't think they deserve to be blamed for.
 
Prosecuters who are so wrapped up in getting convictions and not giving a person a fair trial based on real evidance should be disbarred.
 
Originally posted by: frankgomez75
OMG! WTF!

This man has live most of his life in prison by a man who has too much pride to admit he was wrong. I would love to hear his reason why he won't pardon this poor man. Imagine most of your life thrown away, and now you have a chance to live the latter years of your life a free man but one person is holding you back from moving on with your life.

This reminds me of that movie with Eddie Murphy and Martin Lawrence, "LIFE"

Dude, read the article and the thread. He's out of jail, but he wants (and IMO, deserves) the pardon for the restitution money.

JW
 
Back
Top