Originally posted by: CorporateRecreation
Hahahaha awesome, this is even more funny to matrix zealots who refuse to believe those abortions of film were just hacked together ideas from other people.
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: CorporateRecreation
Hahahaha awesome, this is even more funny to matrix zealots who refuse to believe those abortions of film were just hacked together ideas from other people.
How does this story undermine the story presented in the films? Just because it was stolen from someone else doesn't mean it wasn't a decent trilogy.
Regardless of what you thought about the movies beforehand, this lawsuit shouldn't change your opinion of their plot.
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: CorporateRecreation
Hahahaha awesome, this is even more funny to matrix zealots who refuse to believe those abortions of film were just hacked together ideas from other people.
How does this story undermine the story presented in the films? Just because it was stolen from someone else doesn't mean it wasn't a decent trilogy.
Regardless of what you thought about the movies beforehand, this lawsuit shouldn't change your opinion of their plot.
My guess is it has something to do with Skynet and the machines at war with man and taking over control. That is the same basic theme that the Matrix is founded upon. I'd like to read her manuscript and compare the similarities. I wonder if it ever got published? If not, it probably will now.Originally posted by: Kyteland
How does her work relate to the Terminator?
Originally posted by: Babbles
Wow, so the Whats-the-name Brothers just totally stole the movie, eh? So whom do I blame for all the crappy Matrices[/b?
Also, anybody want to register and paste the second page here for all of us??
The presentation itself was very original, and I enjoyed it for that.Originally posted by: Babbles
....
Second, when we all first saw the Matrix I think everybody thought it was original and innovated. To realize now that it is not original makes the movie less meaningful. To know that the premise of the movie was a stolen idea deminishes my opinion of the movie.
Originally posted by: cobalt
Originally posted by: Babbles
Wow, so the Whats-the-name Brothers just totally stole the movie, eh? So whom do I blame for all the crappy Matrices?
Also, anybody want to register and paste the second page here for all of us??
Fixed. *puts on flamesuit*
Or just click on "Print" to see the whole thing.Originally posted by: KingNothing
Get a login from http://www.bugmenot.com to read the second page.
I saw the original release and seem to recall the discrepancies about the scrolling intro and the exchange for programs, not money. It could be that I'm just not remembering correctly but I don't think so.In the beginning of the movie, there's an intro that scrolls up the screen just like in the movie Star Wars that layz out the plot. It speaks of a nuclear war that happened in the year 2110AD, where humanz were now used as fuel for the machines like batteries
In the part where Neo barters for a stack of programz for programz of his. No money was exchanged like in the edited release(s)
The girl in the beginning who came over Neo's had a rabbit on her arm. In the edited version(s), she's seen with the rabbit on her back shoulderblade
I thought Harlen Ellison won that fight?Originally posted by: Kyteland
How does her work relate to the Terminator?
CORRECTION REGARDING PREVIOUS STORY
In reference to the recent article entitled "Mother of the Matrix Victorious," some information has been deemed misleading. Ms. Sophia Stewart has not yet won her case against Joel Silver, Time Warner and the Wachowski Bros. The decision on October 4th enabled Ms. Stewart to proceed with her case, as all attempts to have it dismissed were unsuccessful. Ms. Stewart's case will proceed through the Central District Court of California.
Thanks,
The Globe Staff