Yeah, where would you park your pickup truck with the shotgun mounted in the back window?Originally posted by: Red Dawn
No because that would mean working in NYC.
On your chest!Originally posted by: dwell
Yeah, where would you park your pickup truck with the shotgun mounted in the back window?Originally posted by: Red Dawn
No because that would mean working in NYC.![]()
Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
Originally posted by: brtspears2
Sure why not, cant let previous experiences put terror into the future, hence terrorism.
yep...there won't be any more plane hijackings for quite some time, until our security measures start to slack again...
In a heartbeat.Originally posted by: Bignate603
Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
Originally posted by: brtspears2
Sure why not, cant let previous experiences put terror into the future, hence terrorism.
yep...there won't be any more plane hijackings for quite some time, until our security measures start to slack again...
Even if there was an attempted hijacking people would attack the terrorist. If you think you know it's going to kill you anyways why wouldn't you risk your life to save it?
Problem is that in '92 they tried to truck bomb it and it fail. So they decided to fly planes into this time. Next time who knows? Maybe they will shoot a half dozen RPGs at it in tandem? Maybe they will do something we would never expect. Sure the hijacking of planes ended as soon the people on Flight 93 overcame the terrorists, but you just can't say they wont keep trying new stuff.Originally posted by: Bignate603
Even if there was an attempted hijacking people would attack the terrorist. If you think you know it's going to kill you anyways why wouldn't you risk your life to save it?Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
yep...there won't be any more plane hijackings for quite some time, until our security measures start to slack again...Originally posted by: brtspears2
Sure why not, cant let previous experiences put terror into the future, hence terrorism.
Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
Originally posted by: majewski9
they arent going to let air traffic any where near there.
I do think they should rebuild the towers bigger than any buildings before them. Its only fitting that the US should have the tallest building in the world.
i think those monstrosities in china and malaysia are starting to stress known construction techniques for height. Besides, to beat those, there's got to be way more land to build up the base on than is available in the wake of the world trade centers. I believe I read on CNN that the WTC held spots 5 and 6, and the ones above it are a lot taller.
Originally posted by: Adul
Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
Originally posted by: majewski9
they arent going to let air traffic any where near there.
I do think they should rebuild the towers bigger than any buildings before them. Its only fitting that the US should have the tallest building in the world.
i think those monstrosities in china and malaysia are starting to stress known construction techniques for height. Besides, to beat those, there's got to be way more land to build up the base on than is available in the wake of the world trade centers. I believe I read on CNN that the WTC held spots 5 and 6, and the ones above it are a lot taller.
they where the 3rd and 4th tallest at the time. Thpetronas towers in malaysia are the two tallest which should be soon passed by another.
Originally posted by: nativesunshine
I would. I'd be the first to sign up for the 110th floor. I mean..what are the chances of what happened happening again?
On a related note, does anyone else think it'd be a great idea to equip all the top floors w/ parachutes?
