Would you perform clitoridotomy on your daughter?

[CanOWorms]

Yes. I would also amputate one of her (imaginary her since I have no daughter) arms and legs and switch them around.

 

[DAGTA]

Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Yes. I would also amputate one of her (imaginary her since I have no daughter) arms and legs and switch them around.

You might start the latest mutilation trend! Genius!

 

[flexy]

Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Its a valid question

definatly ! Not more bizarre or out of the ordinary like the other thread..except that the OTHER stupidity (male circ) is 'accepted' by the society and therefore 'seems' less stupid ...

I fact, both operations are equally retarded and stupid

 

[Yo Ma Ma]

I am pro-intact genitalia no matter the sex of the child.

 

[Eli]

Originally posted by: Anubis
umm no

and this isnt a valid question, men are circumcised because of health reasons and its an accepted practace in like 90% of the world

the female version is only peformed in certian ,iddle eastern countries to keep young women from haveing sex fo pleasure and to keep them faithfull to their husbands, it is ILLEGAL in most of the civilized world for a reason

You see, we've made this really cool stuff that enables non-polar things like fats and oils to be mixed with polar things, like water.

It's called soap. Come out of the dark ages.

 

[flexy]

Originally posted by: Anubis
and this isnt a valid question, men are circumcised because of health reasons and its an accepted practace in like 90% of the world

wrong.

 

[Cobalt]

Originally posted by: Anubis
umm no

and this isnt a valid question, men are circumcised because of health reasons and its an accepted practace in like 90% of the world

the female version is only peformed in certian ,iddle eastern countries to keep young women from haveing sex fo pleasure and to keep them faithfull to their husbands, it is ILLEGAL in most of the civilized world for a reason

Male circumcision doesn't really have much health benefits.. It was more of an ancient thing because of once poor bathing habits, now it's just, dare I say "tradition?", in some families/religions/w.e. Not only that, but male circumcision can reduce sensitivity in that area. I'm not circumcised and I have no health problems because unlike some people, I bathe more than once a year. :\

 

[vi edit]

FWIW, most women I know, that have experienced both...presentations....prefer their men's sausage unwrapped.

 

[Eli]

Originally posted by: vi_edit
FWIW, most women I know, that have experienced both...presentations....prefer their men's sausage unwrapped.

Do you mean because of looks, or feeling?

There should be no difference in feeling(for her), everything else being equal. The skin folds back, and it is basically the same as a circumsized penis, just minus the thick callus that develops over the head.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: vi_edit
FWIW, most women I know, that have experienced both...presentations....prefer their men's sausage unwrapped.

Pull the foreskin back, problem solved, i mean HOW hard is that?

If the girl cannot figure that out, i don't want her in MY bed.

 

[vi edit]

Originally posted by: Eli

Originally posted by: vi_edit
FWIW, most women I know, that have experienced both...presentations....prefer their men's sausage unwrapped.

Do you mean because of looks, or feeling?

There should be no difference in feeling(for her), everything else being equal.

Strictly aesthetics.

 

[Dissipate]

Originally posted by: Eli

Originally posted by: vi_edit
FWIW, most women I know, that have experienced both...presentations....prefer their men's sausage unwrapped.

Do you mean because of looks, or feeling?

There should be no difference in feeling(for her), everything else being equal. The skin folds back, and it is basically the same as a circumsized penis, just minus the thick callus that develops over the head.

Actually the bonus is that if the man is not circumsized his head is more sensitive, also the bonus for the woman is that the foreskin rubs back and forth in the vagina, giving her more pleasure.

 

[Schadenfroh]

7/10

 

[Eli]

Originally posted by: vi_edit

Originally posted by: Eli

Originally posted by: vi_edit
FWIW, most women I know, that have experienced both...presentations....prefer their men's sausage unwrapped.

Do you mean because of looks, or feeling?

There should be no difference in feeling(for her), everything else being equal.

Strictly aesthetics.

I figured.. any difference in feeling would be psychological anyway, either that or .. ehm.. size related.. lol

Well, nothing you can do about that. I'd imagine that it is also a culture/social thing with women just as much as it is with men who are circumsized.

When was the last time you saw a porno with an uncut guy, etc? lol

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: vi_edit

Originally posted by: Eli

Originally posted by: vi_edit
FWIW, most women I know, that have experienced both...presentations....prefer their men's sausage unwrapped.

Do you mean because of looks, or feeling?

There should be no difference in feeling(for her), everything else being equal.

Strictly aesthetics.

And if you pull the foreskin back it looks just like if you were circumcised.

Were the girls you were with incredibly stupid as they couldn't figure THAT out?

 

[MichaelD]

Originally posted by: amdfanboy

Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
I first heard about all this over a dinner conversation with a friend. Any kind of mutilation is horrible.

Fixed

Yes, that's what it is. LIterally.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: Dissipate

Originally posted by: Eli

Originally posted by: vi_edit
FWIW, most women I know, that have experienced both...presentations....prefer their men's sausage unwrapped.

Do you mean because of looks, or feeling?

There should be no difference in feeling(for her), everything else being equal. The skin folds back, and it is basically the same as a circumsized penis, just minus the thick callus that develops over the head.

Actually the bonus is that if the man is not circumsized his head is more sensitive, also the bonus for the woman is that the foreskin rubs back and forth in the vagina, giving her more pleasure.

No it doesn't, you never had sex, did you, when your foreskin is rolled back it is flatter than fvck, it makes no difference and i dunno about you, but she would be have to be dry as hell for it to roll back and forth.

 

[Ausm]

Originally posted by: vi_edit
Have you even found a clit before?

LMAO


Ausm

 

[Allio]

I've heard from a number of women that the shape of the circumsized penis causes trouble during sex. Seeing the head is shaped like a shovel, it tends to gradually scrape out all the lubricant, leading to dryness and general unpleasantness. The foreskin prevents this by covering the base of the head during withdrawal.

And I'm sure most circumsized guys know the effect it has on masturbation.

I'd urge American parents to give the matter a lot of thought before deciding to ensure Junior looks just like his daddy.

 

[Eli]

Originally posted by: Dissipate

Originally posted by: Eli

Originally posted by: vi_edit
FWIW, most women I know, that have experienced both...presentations....prefer their men's sausage unwrapped.

Do you mean because of looks, or feeling?

There should be no difference in feeling(for her), everything else being equal. The skin folds back, and it is basically the same as a circumsized penis, just minus the thick callus that develops over the head.

Actually the bonus is that if the man is not circumsized his head is more sensitive, also the bonus for the woman is that the foreskin rubs back and forth in the vagina, giving her more pleasure.

Er, I'm not a circumsizion supporter.. I realize this.

Although, it pretty much moves as 1 unit, in my experiences... lol.. But I do know what you're talking about. Also remember that every woman is different in what feels good.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: Allio
I've heard from a number of women that the shape of the circumsized penis causes trouble during sex. Seeing the head is shaped like a shovel, it tends to gradually scrape out all the lubricant, leading to dryness and general unpleasantness. The foreskin prevents this by covering the base of the head during withdrawal.

And I'm sure most circumsized guys know the effect it has on masturbation.

I'd urge American parents to give the matter a lot of thought before deciding to ensure Junior looks just like his daddy.

It s a religous tradition that was originally meant to prevent masturbation.

Yes it is mutilation, there is no need for it.

 

[Martin]

So about 30% of people would perform male but not female circumcision. What are your reasons for this? The operations are pretty much identical.

And no, don't give me sh!t like "7/10", answer the fscking question.

 

[StageLeft]

i said I'd circumcize a son, and I would, simply because skin looks ugly. Really though that's a blanket conclusion. I'd look more into it if it was a real concern. Removing a clit/labia is going to SERIOUSLY screw her up later; a bit of skin removed doesn't _screw up_ guys, regardless of the crap about lost sensitivity, etc.

 

[DAGTA]

Originally posted by: Klixxer

Originally posted by: Allio
I've heard from a number of women that the shape of the circumsized penis causes trouble during sex. Seeing the head is shaped like a shovel, it tends to gradually scrape out all the lubricant, leading to dryness and general unpleasantness. The foreskin prevents this by covering the base of the head during withdrawal.

And I'm sure most circumsized guys know the effect it has on masturbation.

I'd urge American parents to give the matter a lot of thought before deciding to ensure Junior looks just like his daddy.

It s a religous tradition that was originally meant to prevent masturbation.

Yes it is mutilation, there is no need for it.

It was/is a religious tradition as it helped with cleanliness long ago when bathing was more irregular.

 

[Martin]

Originally posted by: Skoorb
i said I'd circumcize a son, and I would, simply because skin looks ugly. Really though that's a blanket conclusion. I'd look more into it if it was a real concern. Removing a clit/labia is going to SERIOUSLY screw her up later; a bit of skin removed doesn't _screw up_ guys, regardless of the crap about lost sensitivity, etc.

I suggest you (and the other ppl who misunderstood it) reread the original post. The question is about removal of the clitoral skin, not the clitoris.



Since you (and a number of others) brough up aethetics, would you make her shave her pussy regularly, or at least keep a Brazilian Strip, since it looks better this way?