NO!
Because only a fool hires someone based on a resume.
Resumes do NOT get you employed, at least by anyone competent. They get you an interview. The interview gets you the job.
Dont put outrageous amounts of data in it. One page is almost always enough even if you have 60 years of experience.
Keep It Simple Stupid.
The longer and more complicated it is, the less likely an employer will spend time on it. They dont devote 5 whole minutes to every single resume they read. Its normally about 20 seconds each and thats assuming they find some interesting info early on in the top half of the page.
I got a big book with about 100 other tips. When I left the Navy part of my transition program included a two-day workshop with a fellow from the California Department of Labor. He talked about all the things that employers actually like to see on resumes and not what has tradtionally been thought of as resume material over the years.
Most important concept is that no sane person will hire you strictly from the info on a piece of paper. The interview is what gets the job. You just need to provide enough info to show that you are able to do it, and are interesting enough to call back. No more.
EDIT: Let me show you mine (with edits of course).
Its called a functional resume. It got me an interview along with 9 other guys when about 100 applied. I had extensive help with the Dept of Labor gent and he was not at all suprised when I got the interview and the job. (We also went over some tips on interviews.)
http://www.savefile.com/files/865883
It shows useful work experience and accomplishments. You might think it bad to put in a lot of acronyms and such, but as I knew this would be read by an engineer or someone with a technical backround it was OK. Anything they dont understand they can call me on and find out.
The point is this puppy was visually appealing and layed out in a manner that even a human resources manager could understand what I had done. It makes people WANT to call me and find out more about this interesting person. And my potential supervisor or manager could still see that I was able to do a lot for them.
Thats really what an employer is asking themselves when they read a resume:
"What can this person do for me?"
Show them!
EDIT 2: Along those lines, your second update (3rd attempt) is much better but I would still consider moving experience ahead of education. Again, they arent entirely concerned with what you know, but they are concerned with what you can offer them.
I dont like the objective either. It doesnt really show that you have an interest in helping them, more like an interest in helping yourself, which may come off as a little arrogant to a potential employer.
"This guy wants me to hire him just so he can get more experience and then leave me in 6 months with a hole to fill? Ohhhhhh really? Screw him!"
Actually, they probably wont say that, but you get the idea. The objective should sound more helpful to the employer.
