would you buy monster products if they cost only 25% more than the rest?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tiamat

Lifer
Nov 25, 2003
14,068
5
71
only if they are less expensive than everyone else and their products are of comparable quality. I had some monster RCA cables which were complete crap because the grips were so huge that the R and L interfered with each other going into my preamp.
 

F1N3ST

Diamond Member
Nov 9, 2006
3,802
0
76
I got some component cables off ebay like last week, like $10 with free shipping, they arrived like 2 days shipping from like 2 states away, the ends are gold (or fake gold) plated and the cords are thick as HELL. So NO I would not pay extra for them, these have great quality or w/e. Cables are only significant if it's like a power cord with frayed wires or something lol. The brand was Dynex or something and I'd buy that brand again.
 

boomhower

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2007
7,228
19
81
I will never use Monster products just on principle because of how they operate. Beyond the shady advertising and demos is the suing of mom and pop business's that happen to have monster in the name and absolutely nothing to do with audio/video. I mean common a putt putt golf course?
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
So your asking if I would I buy Monster Cables if they were only moderately overpriced instead of absurdly overpriced?

No. Still a rip-off.
 

Blurry

Senior member
Mar 19, 2002
932
0
0
Originally posted by: JackBurton

Not true. Try routing low grade cables through a wired management system. Pain in the ass! I tried it with some cheap Monoprice cables and it sucked, and it actually put more strain (tight angle) on the HDMI ports than I would have liked. That's when I switched to BJC cables. MUCH better IMO, and they are the same price as the m1000 Monster cables (~$28 for 8'). So it's really a no brainer for me, m1000 or 1000hd all the way. And really, is $10-$15 extra for a cable that big of a deal? You do get a better quality product, so it's not like you are paying extra for nothing. But then again, if a cheap $5 cable fits your needs, I'm not going to argue with you. Knock yourself out.


Please tell where you are able to buy 8' Monster m1000 cables for $28. Everywhere I look it is easily $130+
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
Originally posted by: Blurry
Originally posted by: JackBurton

Not true. Try routing low grade cables through a wired management system. Pain in the ass! I tried it with some cheap Monoprice cables and it sucked, and it actually put more strain (tight angle) on the HDMI ports than I would have liked. That's when I switched to BJC cables. MUCH better IMO, and they are the same price as the m1000 Monster cables (~$28 for 8'). So it's really a no brainer for me, m1000 or 1000hd all the way. And really, is $10-$15 extra for a cable that big of a deal? You do get a better quality product, so it's not like you are paying extra for nothing. But then again, if a cheap $5 cable fits your needs, I'm not going to argue with you. Knock yourself out.


Please tell where you are able to buy 8' Monster m1000 cables for $28. Everywhere I look it is easily $130+

Monster M1000 on eBay. Buy-it-Now, free shipping.
It might even be real Monster cable, but you know the eBay drill: you pays yer money, you takes yer chances.

edit: cleaned up Blurry's quoting...
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
Originally posted by: CallMeJoe
Originally posted by: Blurry
Originally posted by: JackBurton

Not true. Try routing low grade cables through a wired management system. Pain in the ass! I tried it with some cheap Monoprice cables and it sucked, and it actually put more strain (tight angle) on the HDMI ports than I would have liked. That's when I switched to BJC cables. MUCH better IMO, and they are the same price as the m1000 Monster cables (~$28 for 8'). So it's really a no brainer for me, m1000 or 1000hd all the way. And really, is $10-$15 extra for a cable that big of a deal? You do get a better quality product, so it's not like you are paying extra for nothing. But then again, if a cheap $5 cable fits your needs, I'm not going to argue with you. Knock yourself out.


Please tell where you are able to buy 8' Monster m1000 cables for $28. Everywhere I look it is easily $130+

Monster M1000 on eBay. Buy-it-Now, free shipping.
It might even be real Monster cable, but you know the eBay drill: you pays yer money, you takes yer chances.

edit: cleaned up Blurry's quoting...

Here's a working link. And yes, they're REAL Monster cables. :roll: Just don't buy from someone in China. ;)
 

Blurry

Senior member
Mar 19, 2002
932
0
0
LOL, gotcha - I never thought about checking out Ebay for cables....or pretty much anything (due to bad experiences with a trader a long, long time ago)

I might actually have to look into this....Monster cables are a rip at the prices you see at retail stores, but at ~$30 dollars..hmmm it is well made and *shiny*.

Once you've invested thousands in a high end media setup, it feels kinda awkward to be using cheap monoprice cables - I know it doesn't matter, but it's just a thought.
 

Thraxen

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2001
4,683
1
81
Originally posted by: JackBurton
It depends on your setup. I'm planning on bi-wiring my speakers and prefer a nice clean single bi-wire cable with banana connectors. You ain't finding anything like that at Lowes or Home Depot. Sorry. Can you do it with standard speaker cables for much less? Yes. Will it look as clean. No.

Heh... I'm suprised no one commented on that yet. Bi-wiring is another one of those hotly debated topics. It's something that audiophiles do but science says makes no difference. Are you just bi-wiring or actually bi-amping? Bi-amping could make a difference depending on your set-up (though even that is often debated). Bi-wiring though? Save your money, IMO.
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Heh... I'm suprised no one commented on that yet. Bi-wiring is another one of those hotly debated topics. It's something that audiophiles do but science says makes no difference. Are you just bi-wiring or actually bi-amping? Bi-amping could make a difference depending on your set-up (though even that is often debated). Bi-wiring though? Save your money, IMO.

I'll probably try both to see which I like best. Why am I doing it? Because the speakers I'm looking into can. We'll see.
 

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2005
8,771
58
91
monster cables are definitely higher quality than generic cables from monoprice or meritline. they are thicker, bend easier, and feel sturdier. no i am not some noob that praises it just because of price. as opposed to bose, which i feel is all marketting and NOT of good quality sound or construction.

i would definitely pay a little bit more for higher quality cables from Monster, but keep in mind the dminishing returns to cable quality, all we need is for it to be "good enough" and maybe a little more.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
I work in audio post production and we have no monstercable in the house. You want the best? Blackbox.com turn that hdmi signal into Ethernet. Why in the world would you need that at home? i don't know. I think monstercable is scared shitless because like any tech company a new technology can wipe them out. They are trying to fold the costs of all the normal cables into this 1 hdmi because there is no need for multiple cables.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
i would definitely pay a little bit more for higher quality cables from Monster, but keep in mind the dminishing returns to cable quality, all we need is for it to be "good enough" and maybe a little more.

cable quality is actually gauge. Thicker the cable bigger the highway that's it. You want nice audio cable? mogami aes/ebu 2552 with silver solder and switchcraft xlr connectors. Roll your own. Otherwise you are just paying for marketing. Believe me, your hand build audio cables will be far more impressive then a monster cable.
 

Muadib

Lifer
May 30, 2000
18,120
910
126
Originally posted by: spidey07
Absolultely I would. They are very well made cables and it was only a small premium I'd go for it.

I'd join you if the premium was 5-10%
 

saltyvinegar

Junior Member
Jun 4, 2009
10
0
0
I would buy monster cables if they were free as I've spent years watching people get scammed out of their money buying them. $60 for a braided good looking HDMI cable is good but $300 for the same looking cable as most other cables just because it's made by Monster is insane.
 

bruceb

Diamond Member
Aug 20, 2004
8,874
111
106
They are good, but I would not buy them at the local store. Markup is way too high. I research which one I want, then check on line for the most competitive price.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
the biggest BS about the HDMI spec is you can't self terminate. I dont think you can terminate sdi either and thats the pro version.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: JSt0rm01
the biggest BS about the HDMI spec is you can't self terminate. I dont think you can terminate sdi either and thats the pro version.

At these speeds it's a terrible idea to terminate the cable yourself without proper training and testing tools.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Originally posted by: spidey07
At these speeds it's a terrible idea to terminate the cable yourself without proper training and testing tools.

well yes you would need the proper tools to do it hehehe. Just like you need the proper tools to terminate cat5. Not a big hurdle.
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,155
59
91
Originally posted by: mshan
I would respectfully point out that Roger Russell's speaker wire test (from 1980s, comparing lamp cord vs. Monster Cable speaker wire when the whole cable industry was in it's infancy), is invalid because the person conducting the study had an agenda to prove and thus was not an impartial conductor of that study:

"Despite the effectiveness of Gordon's cable demonstration and the truth about speaker wire, people visiting the McIntosh room at the shows, who had not experienced the cable demonstration, were disturbed that we were using ordinary heavy zip cord instead of one of the popular brands of speaker wire. Instead of listening to the McIntosh speakers and electronics, they recalled "bad" things they had been told about "common" speaker wire and this promoted questions about the "inferior" wire being used. When we changed the wire to a popular brand of wire, customers were happy with the setup, and directed their attention to the McIntosh equipment."
Pull up the scientific study he conducted so potential customers will spend their whole budget on McIntosh components, and not have a smaller budget because a portion of it is going to a Monster Cable dealer instead.

It would be like a drug company citing a study paid for by scientists on their payroll that they state definitively proves that their product is better than a competitors. Consciously or not, there are ways to manipulate the design of a scientific study, the actual execution of study (e. g. was it obvious to these randomly picked participants, either overtly or more subtly through their interaction with Mr. Russell, during listening sessions, knew exactly what result he wanted), choose particular type of statistical analysis that skews towards the desired result, etc. that can invalidate the findings of that particular study.

I do agree, that even in fairly high end systems, you can probably get quite far using competently manufactured, stranded copper wire of appropriate gauge with bare wire ends, but isn't it possible, that, just maybe, 30 years of trial and error and more recently computer aided design, may have advanced cable design and manufacture further than that original Monster speaker wire of the early 1980s? (whether current cable manufacturers have just designed a particularly seductive tone control, or are truly passing a more accurate signal, that's a totally different question, and really depends upon design philosophy of particular cable manufacturer).
No. Electricity is still electricity, and that is what you are passing through speaker cables.
You can refine the wires all you want, but the facts of the matter haven't changed. The more power you are trying to push through a wire, the bigger a wire you need. Not "more expensive", just bigger. If you have the most expensive audio system in the world, you can run Home Depot wire to the speakers, and as long as the wire is the correct gauge to carry the current, it will sound no different than that crap that costs 5000 bucks a foot. It won't look as good, but the sound will be the same.
That's why nobody, not even these uppity audio snobs, and nobody from these high-dollar wire manufacturers, will put their money where their mouths (or ears) are and take the Million Dollar Challenge. If there is such a difference.....why wouldn't you take the challenge and win a million bucks?

If you read the Roger Russell article, the only reason they stopped using cheap speaker cables in their McIntosh Sound Lab demo setups was, people had started hearing about "better" cable, and were questioning them using the cheap stuff. So, to eliminate those questions, they simply switched to the more expensive cables. This got people's minds off whether the wires were affecting the sound of the components and let them focus only on the sound itself. Which was no different than using lamp cord.

Plus, he hasn't worked for McIntosh in years, has no financial stake in them at all, and still says the same thing. Guy is a genius, and he is right. Not like he's alone out there saying this, either.
 

mshan

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2004
7,868
0
71
And the earth is still flat! ;)

Regarding the Million Dollar Challenge, article said Michel Fremer and that man couldn't come to terms on details of the test, not that he wasn't willing to take challenge.

Chain of components would, for results to be valid, have to have sufficient genuine transparency and resolution to delineate subtle differences between speaker wires, if they exist. Using some mass market mid-fi speakers as test speakers doesn't necessarily prove anything because they may be so opaque that, as long as you feed them a decent, intact signal and use an amp that can drive the speakers appropriately, they will always sound the same.

I've heard Wilson speakers at audio shows, but never owned them, so I don't know their characteristics intimately. I have read that Dave Wilson believes that speakers are most important part of chain (vs. Ivor Tifenbrun of Linn turntables, who believes source is most important), and I think he voices his speaker line that way. He even demonstrated at some audio show using an iPod as source for an otherwise rather expensive chain of components. I would guess that as long as he was producing clean signal path, and amp had sufficient power / current, etc. to drive Wilson speakers, predominant characteristic you would always hear is Wilson house sound.

That lady did hear a difference, though she may not been able to verbalize, in audiophile terminology, exactly what difference she perceived. Her comment about more spaciousness could refer to picking up more low level detail in terms of ambience cues ("air") of original recording space as encoded in recording, or, something a home theater fan with good chain of components and a really accurate sub that go really low may experience, spaciousness is recreating better sense of the space and scale of original recording (e. g. large church), where those very low frequencies, now being sent to speaker more cleanly, allow you, in your mind's eye, to "see" / sense / flesh out a more realistic scale of original recording space, to sense walls of church, to hear rumble of extraneous subway running underground at very low spl, etc. Speakers themselves obviously would have to be able to dig down into those very low bass frequencies accurately and without excess bloat, and speaker wires would have to be able to resolve such low level detail, if they were in original recording (the ridiculous price tag a cable manufacturer puts on his cables, including absurd prices of Shunyata products linked below, would be a totally different issue vs. whether or not all speaker wire sounds the same).



edit: As for electricity just being electricity, there are a lot of professional musicians and recording engineers who disagree, and have spent uber-bucks on snake oil interconnects, speaker wires, and yes, power cords and power line conditioning equipment:

"I have been very skeptical of power related tweaks above and beyond good basic engineering practices like wire sizing, proper grounding and good solid connections. That said I tried to be open to the merits of the Shunyata approach regarding power management. After living with various power cables, outlets and Hydra AC distribution systems for several months while working on my DMP Archive Project, I can honestly say that Shunyata Power Systems do contribute to a more solid, focused and accurate sonic picture." -- Tom Jung, President: Digital Music Products Inc. http://shunyata.com/Content/endorsements-Prof.html

"Connecting a power or speaker cable to an amplifier would seem to be a simple matter. Get the largest wire available and make the connection as short as practical. What appears to be simple becomes complex as the physics of the problem are examined. All wires have an inherent resistance, inductance and capacitance. This means that a cable is actually a type of simple filter. The ideal cable would have zero resistance, zero inductance and zero capacitance. A simplistic design approach would be to make the conductors larger or use multiple conductors to decrease the resistance of the cable. Unfortunately this approach increases the inductance and capacitance of the cable, which our research shows is actually more deleterious to linear signal propagation than increased resistance. Resistance is a linear function while inductive and capacitive reactance is a non-linear function that is frequency dependent. This means that high-frequency information is skewed while phase-shift anomalies are inter-modulated with the signal." http://shunyata.com/Content/te...cal-HelixGeometry.html
 

Coalfax

Senior member
Nov 22, 2002
400
82
101
Support a company that sues any other company that has the word "Monster" in their name? No thanks. I'll go with Blue Jeans or Monoprice for a cable