Would you be willing to do it?

[SnapIT]

Only for my kids...

 

[compudog]

Originally posted by: Skoorb
Probabably only for wife/kids/family.

ditto. My kids first, then the wife, then the family.

 

[LordRaiden]

Originally posted by: compudog

Originally posted by: Skoorb
Probabably only for wife/kids/family.

ditto. My kids first, then the wife, then the family.

I concure. Kids are most important. They need to survive even if it costs you your life. Because they are most precious. Now that I think about it more, I think I would have to say the same thing. Kids first, then wife, then family, then friends in that order.

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Originally posted by: LordRaiden

Originally posted by: compudog

Originally posted by: Skoorb
Probabably only for wife/kids/family.

ditto. My kids first, then the wife, then the family.

I concure. Kids are most important. They need to survive even if it costs you your life. Because they are most precious. Now that I think about it more, I think I would have to say the same thing. Kids first, then wife, then family, then friends in that order.

 

[melly]

in an instant. of course, i must like the person. but yeah generally speaking i would. i'm sick of this world.

 

[PCMarine]

Originally posted by: caramel
in an instant. of course, i must like the person. but yeah generally speaking i would. i'm sick of this world.

 

[rgwalt]

Originally posted by: lirion
If you would die for your friend, and you friend would die for you, when the time comes, how do you decide who gets it?

Good point.

Ryan

 

[TallBill]

this is definitly a situational thing... besides.. how many REAL LIFE scenarios exist where the outcome is 100% chance of saving someone and 100% of dying?

 

[Atlantean]

That would depend entirely on the circumstances.

 

[mztykal]

I'd be like, na man, I'm sorry, you mah boy and all, but shiet. Ain't asking for much huh?

Actually, it'd depend on the situation, like if I were single and alone and he had a family.