- Jun 24, 2004
- 15,628
- 5
- 81
I currently have an Athlon X2 with 4x1 GB of Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800, which is CL5. I'm planning on a mobo+CPU upgrade soon. When I do that, I could just move my current RAM over, but I'm thinking of instead getting new RAM. I figure I can use the opportunity to move to 2 GB modules, giving me future upgrade potential, and I can upgrade to CL4 while I'm at it.
Normally I'd just keep the RAM but the other aspect is that once I've done this upgrade, I'll have almost enough spare parts to assemble a whole new computer, which I can then sell. If I want to do that, I'll have to get RAM for it anyway, so I may as well use the upgrade as a second reason to get faster RAM.
So my questions are just as in the title. First, would it actually make any difference going from CL5 to CL4? Second, I've heard some people say that having four modules can actually cause more problems than two (I guess there's twice as much chance of one of them being bad?). Is there any good reason to stick to two RAM modules?
Normally I'd just keep the RAM but the other aspect is that once I've done this upgrade, I'll have almost enough spare parts to assemble a whole new computer, which I can then sell. If I want to do that, I'll have to get RAM for it anyway, so I may as well use the upgrade as a second reason to get faster RAM.
So my questions are just as in the title. First, would it actually make any difference going from CL5 to CL4? Second, I've heard some people say that having four modules can actually cause more problems than two (I guess there's twice as much chance of one of them being bad?). Is there any good reason to stick to two RAM modules?