Originally posted by: amdhunter
For example, in Manhattan, the FDR drive has a speed limit of 40MPH, but generally traffic flows ~55-65 when you can...
How illegal would it be to gather around 20 people, and have them all hover around 39MPH on the highway, on both the Northbound and Southbound lanes? I say 20 people are necessary so that they could avoid blocking all lanes in a single line, but maintain a position where no cars can pass (illegally, since to pass they'd have to speed.)
They wouldn't be breaking any laws, would they...or would the city tie in some obscure terror law or something to find a way to arrest or charge anyone who tried this?
If you really want to mangle traffic, then just briefly slow down to 20-40 MPH below the speed limit and then back to crusing speed (in the passing lane of course). Guarantee everyone else will be doing it for the rest of the rush-hour. As more and more traffic accumulates on the road, the problem will geometricly increase until the entire hiway is jammed. The other lanes would be forced to slow down due to people that are now at a standstill cutting others off trying to get into the lane that is still moving. Wouldn't take more than one car, and if you had 20 friends of a like mind, you could shut down the whole city.
That being said, one granny in the passing lane or one person cutting another person off causing them to hit their brakes has a similar effect and occurs on a daily basis.
The legality of something like this would range from being a public nuisence to murder if someone gets killed in a pile-up. This would probably apply to the OP's method too. Much less likely to get caught my way though.
This raises the question that if society in general left a little space between cars for others to merge without cutting someone off (thus causing them to hit their brakes), used the passing lane for passing, and drove at a little more uniform speed, wouldn't traffic flow a little faster. We should be teaching future generations to not drive like pricks.