Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Originally posted by: fleabag
Given the fact that you didn't even know nor understood the fact that a tire's load index listed on the tire wall is a calculation based upon the tire's sidewall rating indicates to me you really haven't a fucking clue as to what you're talking about. This is an undisputed fact - NO IT IS NOT, what is being disputed is whether or not one should inflate their tires to what the sidewall says.
A tyres load isn't based on its sidewall rating, nor does it require the tire to be inflated that high, it at 35 psi for standard car tires and 41 PSI for XL tires. You are wrong and to keep spouting that as a fact, which makes you look like an idiot.
Of course I know that a tyres load capacity is dependant on its inflation, that's basic high school physics, and obvious to anyone who experience with tyres...
*Everyone knows this*
Originally posted by: fleabag
The reason why they do that is to absolve them of liability in the event something happens.
Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Why would they need absolved of liability if inflating to the maximum sidewall pressure was absolutely safe? The answer is they wouldn't. If some random member of the public inflated them to their max sidewall, got in an accident and tried to sue the tire company, all they would have to do in court is stand up and say "Our tires and advice on how to inflate them were not responsible for the accident, here is a ream of data proving that inflating the tires to sidewall provides best grip, and best wear etc."
Ford vs. Firestone? Did you SEE how they were blaming each other!?!?! Because it would piss off manufacturers if they tried to make the most quiet, luxurious car only to have that destroyed by a tire company that makes its customers inflate to sidewall, making for a louder, rougher ride... Also there is the slight possibility of the tires wearing down the center, but judging by how many cars I've seen with wear along the sides, I'd say they couldn't give two shits about tire wear and only care about making the smoothest riding car out there while compromising on other things like handling, fuel economy, and in some cases road noise (rolling resistance).
Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Originally posted by: fleabag
What is so difficult with you idiots is that you'll blindly follow manufacturer recommendations even if it results in various adverse effects, such as a rollover. If I told you that inflating your tires resulted in them blowing out when taking tight corners, possibly causing the the vehicle to roll over and that the solution is to inflate the tires to sidewall, you'd all ignore me and ask for me to be banned, cite the AAA website suggesting to listen to the car manufacturer's suggestion and leave it at that. But THEN, all of a sudden, Ford comes out and says exactly what I say, THEN ONLY THEN will you even bother to listen to what I say.
The problem with the firestones was that people were not checking their tire pressures and were running them underinflated compared to the manufacturers recommendation. The recommended pressure was increased to prevent lazy people from killing themselves by not checking their tire pressures.
c'mon, let's face it, the real reason ford chose 26psi is it was the only way to get that fucking pickup truck (Explorer was based on a pickup) from not riding like one. Also if you took a good look at those tires, I'm pretty sure you'd see wear down the sides.
Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Originally posted by: fleabag
Golf ball dimples on a car to improve fuel economy?
We all saw the video, with the clay and without the proper scaling of the dimples...
[/quote]
See, that's what you don't get. Two, three weeks ago if I said the same thing, we'd have everybody disputing it.
Plane on a treadmill, will it take off??
Same crap.
Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Originally posted by: fleabag
Cruising behind a tractor trailer to improve fuel economy?
We all know that driving 2' off a tractor trailers ass will reduce the aerodynamic drag on the following car... we would just question the safety of doing so.
[/quote]
Meh, if you wouldn't believe it, someone else wouldn't and they'd get into a heated argument about how driving 15 feet of a tractor trailer is not going to result in you getter better fuel economy even though it will.
Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Originally posted by: fleabag
Windows XP is faster than Vista?Impossible!
Not only has no one said this, it bears no relevance to cars.
[/quote]
Actually people have said this, regardless of whether or not it's true.
Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Originally posted by: fleabag
I'm annoyed that you people accuse me of lacking intelligence and critical thinking skills yet I seem to be the only one actually doing anything
Sorry we have provided links and data supporting our ideas. You have provided speculation, anecdotal evidence and hearsay...
What data? you don't have any data, you have links to consumer sites spouting out the same crap they've been saying since the beginning of time yet we've gone from solid tires, to inner tube bias tires, to tubeless bias tires, bias ply, radial and finally the much more advanced radial tires you have today. The risk of a tire wearing down the very center of a tire is reduced today due to being radials, even if you inflate to 100psi.
Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
You keep saying that tire pressure is a comprimise... but max sidewall or greater is best, without knowing what other peoples criteria are. Sure for a hypermiler max PSI may get them an extra few mpgs, but others may not like the harsh ride, and other associated problems.
This was already established in other threads by me acknowledging the downfalls of higher tire pressure. However since his daughter didn't notice, she obviously didn't seem to care enough to tell daddy or whomever what she did. I have all the cars in my family inflated to sidewall and none of them have complained about it even when I prompted them the question. The unforseen benefit to harder tires besides fuel economy, handling and less likelihood of hydroplaning is that more people will actually complain about the terrible state our roads are in and maybe more of them will be improved. There is a particular section going from Highway 24 to 680 south that I really hate because there is a really high bump in the road and it's in the two far right hand lanes (you'll hit the bump if you don't change lanes).
Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Originally posted by: fleabag
I mean to have someone question me about the fact that I found my tires to wear perfectly evenly when inflated to sidewall opposed to down the sides like they used to when I had them inflated to the door jam recommendation.
I think you mean your parents/sisters tires... and it is perfectly reasonable for people to ask for evidence, you could have posted pics and given details about rotation, how many miles covered and fuel used... but I forgot that you don't own a car so you can't do that.
Whether I own a car or not, I'm actually still capable of doing that.
Tell you what, if we can get a consensus of anandtech garage that I'm right and know what I'm talking about based solely upon the pictures I provide and the tire pressures that go along with them, then I'll do it. I'll go find cars that have wear down the sides yet are inflated to the rating on the door jam and then find cars that are inflated to sidewall and show you how perfectly even or near perfectly even wear they have. My friend's Dad's pickup is a great example of this, rear tires are near bald in the middle and in the front the tires are really worn down on the sides and I believe he is following the door jam's tire pressure recommendation.