LiuKangBakinPie
Diamond Member
- Jan 31, 2011
- 3,903
- 0
- 0
yOU CANT MAKE THAT ASSUMPTION WITH oops sorry caps lock is on... with psus that was send by a manufacturer to be reviiewed. Plus testing aint normal everyday circumstances. Newer aint more effecient. Give me a test where a 5 yr old psu whos been pulling a 280w load for the past 5 yearss and tell me it wont be effecient. max effeciency is only achieve if the psu runs at 40 to 60 percent of its load. Thats what that numbers mean not coz of age coz they guarentee that but they expect you to run it between 40 to 60 percent.If you think anything I posted in that post was untrue, then I would say I know a sight more than you do.
Lets take a look at some facts
PC P&C Turbo-Cool 1200w
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=458&type=expert&pid=1
You'll see the review date is October 2007. Over 3 years ago, but it is built on the same platform as the older Turbo-Cool 1kW. So 5 years, perhaps some exaggeration, but the design is still at least 4 years old.
20% load efficiency is 77%
50% load efficiency is 84%
100% load efficiency is 80%
do a google search for what they are selling for still...~$400+
Or he could buy this for less than $300
http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=198
Newer design
20% load efficiency 88%
50% load efficiency 90%
100% load efficiency 87%
So that is a newer, cheaper, more efficient and better PSU.
Is there any reason to replace a PC P&C Turbo Cool with the Antec? No
But, why would you buy a new one instead of that?
So bringing up numbers trying to proof newer psus are more effecient due to that is wrong.
