Would a program like the CCC be possible today?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
It is not just possible, but extremely probable. Barring a massive technological breakthrough, we are heading to a country where you have 50 or so million people living in walled cities, protected by drones, raking in the federal reserve money printing. These are all the people who are connected somehow to the racketeers runnign the central bank. The remaining 300+ million people will be destitute, and not allowed into the affluent zones. They will live in tents and earn around $100 a month on average. These people will have their little trinkets (smartphones, etc) spewing a constant stream of propaganda, to keep them docile so they dont revolt. So yeah, there will be all sorts of programs like CCC to keep them passive. Hell they might even have to take a medication that makes them more passive in order to be in the program. (It will probably sterilize them too, and give them cancer on a 10 year clock.)
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
687
126
Pure false attribution & denial, of course.

I'll agree that govt has been part of the problem, ever since Reagan, even since Carter, who was a great fan of deregulation & "free markets".

They've followed trickle down Reaganomics clear to the end of the rope, the 2008 crash & the lingering lesser depression. Not to mention that the right wing has successfully inoculated their adherents against any idea that the reason there aren't enough jobs is because the Job Creators don't need us the way they once did- they have machines & exploited, underpaid Chinese to do the work for them.

You see, this is where you don't understand me. I'm very much against outsourcing because IMO, that's the biggest enemy of the middle class. The myth that we're outsourcing jobs "no one wants" and that we need to become a "service-based economy" is breathtakingly short-sighted.

Since you mentioned "Job Creators," I'm going to assume you're referring to CEOs specifically. Please tell me exactly what you propose to do in order to regulate (or whatever term you prefer) them.

The answer isn't to belittle the less fortunate

How is providing a program which gives them marketable skills while getting work done that needs to be done "belittling" them? This is a thought process I'll never understand -- those on the left seem to think handouts should be given with no conditions and if you try to attach conditions, you're [insert racist, sexist, elitist, or other -ist]. I don't understand this logic. No one -- let me repeat, NO ONE -- has a right to be supported by the US taxpayer. People are given assistance because it was intended as a safety net. I agree with the existence of this safety net. What I don't agree with is cycles of multi-generational poverty. At some point, you need to let people sink or swim on their own.

All this propaganda induced yammering about smaller govt has a nice emotional ring to it, until we realize that there aren't private sector jobs for laid off govt workers, nor will there be any time RSN. There already aren't enough jobs, so there's no point in making it worse, unless you're already Rich. The best time to be Rich is when everybody else is busted, broke & begging, which is exactly what Repubs are trying to achieve atm.

The bolded line is probably true, but it is interesting how when lefties talk about eliminating insurance companies and going to single payer, they never seem to think about the laid off insurance workers finding work. Interesting, but I digress. Anyway.....

I am certainly not rich by any stretch of the imagination. I was raised middle class and at most, I've made it to upper middle class status. The point I'm trying to make is that the jobs are out there if you have skills, regardless of your lot in life. In August alone, I had 3 job offers. I don't expect others to be this fortunate, BUT the point is that if you have marketable skills, you will have a much better chance of finding a real job. That's what we're advocating with something like the CCC.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
It is not just possible, but extremely probable. Barring a massive technological breakthrough, we are heading to a country where you have 50 or so million people living in walled cities, protected by drones, raking in the federal reserve money printing. These are all the people who are connected somehow to the racketeers runnign the central bank. The remaining 300+ million people will be destitute, and not allowed into the affluent zones. They will live in tents and earn around $100 a month on average. These people will have their little trinkets (smartphones, etc) spewing a constant stream of propaganda, to keep them docile so they dont revolt. So yeah, there will be all sorts of programs like CCC to keep them passive. Hell they might even have to take a medication that makes them more passive in order to be in the program. (It will probably sterilize them too, and give them cancer on a 10 year clock.)

large
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
It is not just possible, but extremely probable. Barring a massive technological breakthrough, we are heading to a country where you have 50 or so million people living in walled cities, protected by drones, raking in the federal reserve money printing. These are all the people who are connected somehow to the racketeers runnign the central bank. The remaining 300+ million people will be destitute, and not allowed into the affluent zones. They will live in tents and earn around $100 a month on average. These people will have their little trinkets (smartphones, etc) spewing a constant stream of propaganda, to keep them docile so they dont revolt. So yeah, there will be all sorts of programs like CCC to keep them passive. Hell they might even have to take a medication that makes them more passive in order to be in the program. (It will probably sterilize them too, and give them cancer on a 10 year clock.)

OK

Good talk

See you later.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
687
126
It is not just possible, but extremely probable. Barring a massive technological breakthrough, we are heading to a country where you have 50 or so million people living in walled cities, protected by drones, raking in the federal reserve money printing. These are all the people who are connected somehow to the racketeers runnign the central bank. The remaining 300+ million people will be destitute, and not allowed into the affluent zones. They will live in tents and earn around $100 a month on average. These people will have their little trinkets (smartphones, etc) spewing a constant stream of propaganda, to keep them docile so they dont revolt. So yeah, there will be all sorts of programs like CCC to keep them passive. Hell they might even have to take a medication that makes them more passive in order to be in the program. (It will probably sterilize them too, and give them cancer on a 10 year clock.)

Looks like someone is nipping the eggnog a few weeks early.