• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Would a member of PETA turn down life-preserving medication that was developed through animal testing?

her209

her209

No Lifer
Apparently PETA is opposed to the animal testing involved to develop AIDS medication and research. So do you think if a member of PETA would turn down life-preserving medication that was developed through animal testing?
 
PETA's vice president uses Insulin made from cows, so I guess not...even though they are against it.

Edit: That's right, dogs, not cows.
 
A member might, but their leaders are hypocritical crazies yearning for a pet-taliban to rule America and enforce their views.
 
I am actually waiting for someone to make a T-Shirt that says

"FOR ANIMAL TESTING"

to counter these yahoos.
 
its like the antistem cell people. somehow i doubt if a family member were dying they would refuse treatment that came from what they hate so much.
 
Originally posted by: her209
Apparently PETA is opposed to the animal testing involved to develop AIDS medication and research. So do you think if a member of PETA would turn down life-preserving medication that was developed through animal testing?
Click to expand...

If they are true to their cause, yes.
 
Originally posted by: Drakkon
http://thatvideosite.com/view/709.html - watch...learn...
vice pres of peta is diabetic...insulin was dervied through testing on dogs...she says she thinks the animals would support her using insulin of their fallen brothers so that she can help further their cause
Click to expand...

hahah it's ok for me to do it, because the dogs wouldn't mind :roll:
 
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Drakkon
http://thatvideosite.com/view/709.html - watch...learn...
vice pres of peta is diabetic...insulin was dervied through testing on dogs...she says she thinks the animals would support her using insulin of their fallen brothers so that she can help further their cause
Click to expand...
nice cop out
Click to expand...

but MOSH!!!! she is in touch with the animals.....and they told her they do not mind....
 
Originally posted by: sonz70
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Drakkon
http://thatvideosite.com/view/709.html - watch...learn...
vice pres of peta is diabetic...insulin was dervied through testing on dogs...she says she thinks the animals would support her using insulin of their fallen brothers so that she can help further their cause
Click to expand...
nice cop out
Click to expand...

but MOSH!!!! she is in touch with the animals.....and they told her they do not mind....
Click to expand...
of course. she's probably a regular Dr. Doolittle when it benefits her.

 
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: sonz70
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Drakkon
http://thatvideosite.com/view/709.html - watch...learn...
vice pres of peta is diabetic...insulin was dervied through testing on dogs...she says she thinks the animals would support her using insulin of their fallen brothers so that she can help further their cause
Click to expand...
nice cop out
Click to expand...

but MOSH!!!! she is in touch with the animals.....and they told her they do not mind....
Click to expand...
of course. she's probably a regular Dr. Doolittle when it benefits her.
Click to expand...

She does have a point.
If the animals have already suffered, why not make it so they did not suffer in vain? She can still want to stop future suffering by campaigning against animal testing.
Just because everyone in this thread seems to be hugely anti-PETA and obsessed with criticising them at every opportunity does not mean you are forced to lose all objectivity and sense of logic at the same time.

Maybe it's a little hypocritical, maybe it's not.
 
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: sonz70
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Drakkon
http://thatvideosite.com/view/709.html - watch...learn...
vice pres of peta is diabetic...insulin was dervied through testing on dogs...she says she thinks the animals would support her using insulin of their fallen brothers so that she can help further their cause
Click to expand...
nice cop out
Click to expand...

but MOSH!!!! she is in touch with the animals.....and they told her they do not mind....
Click to expand...
of course. she's probably a regular Dr. Doolittle when it benefits her.
Click to expand...

She does have a point.
If the animals have already suffered, why not make it so they did not suffer in vain? She can still want to stop future suffering by campaigning against animal testing.
Just because everyone in this thread seems to be hugely anti-PETA and obsessed with criticising them at every opportunity does not mean you are forced to lose all objectivity and sense of logic at the same time.

Maybe it's a little hypocritical, maybe it's not.
Click to expand...

If the action is not so bad that it's morally acceptable to accept a product developed from it, then it is morally okay to continue using that method.
 
Originally posted by: her209
Apparently PETA is opposed to the animal testing involved to develop AIDS medication and research. So do you think if a member of PETA would turn down life-preserving medication that was developed through animal testing?
Click to expand...

Jehovah's Witnesses have been doing similar things recently...and most religions the same since day one.

PETA is not a religion, but if you believe you should.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top