I've always assumed that even though it's several years old, the 10,000RPM, 74 gig raptor in my system would make a good scratch disk/swap file drive. I've also assumed that the Raptor 150 I have is still a better boot drive than the larger 500 and 1.5TB drives I have for storage.
But the comparison chart at tom's hardware (http://www.tomshardware.com/ch...compare,1039.html?prod[2362]=on&prod[2367]=on&prod[2360]=on&prod[2373]=on&prod[2366]=on) seems to indicate that the new 1.5tb caviar green drives i just bought (that have half the rotational speed) are faster than both of my older raptors.
Which means it's silly to boot from the raptor 150 because im actually SLOWING my system down by doing that.
Am i reading the benchmarks wrong? How can a 5400 "green" drive be faster than a 10k rpm raptor thats only a few years old? I know technology moves fast, but still...
If this is true, is there ANY point in keeping around either raptor drive in my current system (Assuming i don't need the extra disk space)?
But the comparison chart at tom's hardware (http://www.tomshardware.com/ch...compare,1039.html?prod[2362]=on&prod[2367]=on&prod[2360]=on&prod[2373]=on&prod[2366]=on) seems to indicate that the new 1.5tb caviar green drives i just bought (that have half the rotational speed) are faster than both of my older raptors.
Which means it's silly to boot from the raptor 150 because im actually SLOWING my system down by doing that.
Am i reading the benchmarks wrong? How can a 5400 "green" drive be faster than a 10k rpm raptor thats only a few years old? I know technology moves fast, but still...
If this is true, is there ANY point in keeping around either raptor drive in my current system (Assuming i don't need the extra disk space)?