Worst man of the 20th century

[miri]

Who do you think was the worst?

 

[StrangerGuy]

miri

 

[swtethan]

miri

 

[Suspicious-Teach8788]

Mao's not that horrible... LoL. He sucked but not that bad.

I say George W Bush.

 

[swtethan]

omg you stole my idea....

 

[xSkyDrAx]

miri.

bad posts

 

[miri]

Originally posted by: DLeRium
Mao's not that horrible... LoL. He sucked but not that bad.

Starving over 20 million people is not bad? Whats your definition of bad?

 

[Sheepathon]

This poll is missing so many people it's ridiculous.

 

[mchammer]

Hitler

 

[miri]

Originally posted by: Sheepathon
This poll is missing so many people it's ridiculous.

I only put people on their that were responsible for over 20 million deaths a piece.

 

[CraKaJaX]

Originally posted by: Sheepathon
This poll is missing so many people it's ridiculous.

 

[themroc27]

George W. Bush

 

[mchammer]

Originally posted by: miri

Originally posted by: Sheepathon
This poll is missing so many people it's ridiculous.

I only put people on their that were responsible for over 20 million deaths a piece.

"a truly elite club"

 

[kogase]

Hitler certainly had a very far reaching effect on many, many people, but I wonder how evil he really was? How sadistic? He mostly ordered killings, and then not even necessarily ordered all the killing that took place. Someone like Charles Manson is probably a much more unstable and "evil" person than Hitler, even though he killed less.

 

[CraKaJaX]

Originally posted by: miri

Originally posted by: Sheepathon
This poll is missing so many people it's ridiculous.

I only put people on their that were responsible for over 20 million deaths a piece.

then obviously they are all f*cking bad.

 

[thirdlegstump]

Bush. Obviously.

 

[MX2]

I need to brush up on history

 

[Amused]

Stalin. But by pure percentage of population murdered in the shortest amount of time, Pol Pot takes the cake.

 

[Kilgor]

Stalin was most likely the worst if you go buy death count.

 

[mchammer]

Originally posted by: kogase
Hitler certainly had a very far reaching effect on many, many people, but I wonder how evil he really was? How sadistic? He mostly ordered killings, and then not even necessarily ordered all the killing that took place. Someone like Charles Manson is probably a much more unstable and "evil" person than Hitler, even though he killed less.

Possibly, what about Eichman then? I think the op is talking in terms of who caused the most problems in the 20th

 

[miri]

Originally posted by: Kilgor
Stalin was most likely the worst if you go buy death count.

Nah, Mao had him beat by a longshot, but Mao also had a lot more people he could kill.

 

[Vertimus]

Originally posted by: Kilgor
Stalin was most likely the worst if you go buy death count.

 

[Ktulu]

Originally posted by: DLeRium
Mao's not that horrible... LoL. He sucked but not that bad.

I say George W Bush.

wouldn't he be the worst for the 21st century

 

[imported_lol]

Originally posted by: miri

Originally posted by: DLeRium
Mao's not that horrible... LoL. He sucked but not that bad.

Starving over 20 million people is not bad? Whats your definition of bad?

killing 20 million. ok maybe not 20 million, but is there a reason we're still overseas and losing valuable lives? my vote for this thread is bush. go ahead and flame me.

 

[mchammer]

Originally posted by: Kilgor
Stalin was most likely the worst if you go buy death count.

not sure about that. I heard Hitler could be said to have resulted in 80 millin deaths. Stalin about 20 mil, no?