- Oct 24, 2006
- 1,401
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
didn't they drive down there on top gear a couple seasons back?
That plan failed the environmental impact assessment.Originally posted by: Alienwho
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?
Originally posted by: Alienwho
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?
Originally posted by: Alienwho
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?
Originally posted by: Alienwho
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?
Originally posted by: ForumMaster
cool bridge but what would happen if someone had an accident and drove of the bridge? :Q
Originally posted by: jfall
http://www.confederationbridge.com/images/photo_gallery/bridgenb2.jpg 12.9 km over water that freezes ftw
I have to pay $40 to cross it though![]()
Yeah it is hard to see the exact landscape based on the photos. It is a very pretty bridge and area nonetheless. However, where i'm from, there's no bank that isn't too steep for dynamite to straighten out.Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
Originally posted by: Alienwho
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?
IIRC there already is a passage way like that. Just takes like 4 hours to traverse, where the bridge takes about 20 minutes.
Again, IIRC.
