Worlds coolest bridge. IMO.

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
didn't they drive down there on top gear a couple seasons back?
 

secretanchitman

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
9,353
23
91
Originally posted by: ElFenix
didn't they drive down there on top gear a couple seasons back?

they did...jeremy took his ford gt, richard was in the pagani zonda (not the zonda F sadly), and james was in a ferrari F430 convertible.

man, i'd kill to go on a bridge like that.
 

Alienwho

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2001
6,766
0
76
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?
 

buck

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
12,273
4
81
I saw an discovery channel show on this bridge, freakin cool if you ask me.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,616
10,320
136
Originally posted by: Alienwho
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?
That plan failed the environmental impact assessment.
 

zeruty

Platinum Member
Jan 17, 2000
2,276
2
81
Originally posted by: Alienwho
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?

QFT

If they had just paved down one side, up the other, it would have been cheaper and they could have added more lanes. That would have decreased there traffic problem! plus saved a crapload of money
 

ggnl

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2004
5,095
1
0
Originally posted by: Alienwho
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?

You cant really tell from the pictures but the two slopes are pretty steep and mountainous. The road that was there before they built the bridge had 5-6 switchbacks on each side of the valley.
 
Feb 24, 2001
14,513
4
81
Originally posted by: Alienwho
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?

IIRC there already is a passage way like that. Just takes like 4 hours to traverse, where the bridge takes about 20 minutes.

Again, IIRC.
 

Mr Pickles

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
4,103
1
0
I don't like it. View it from the side and you'll see that it looks as if it droops between the spans. Bridges don't look good when they are straight across and that high up. There's just something missing, the ideal of it all... think of the parthenon and how they purposely arched the entire thing because if it were flat it would look as though it was sagging in the center. - that's how architecture like this should be.

If they were going for some majestic piece of functionality, it's only worth to us is the worth of appeal, and the droop makes it unappealing.
 

Mr Pickles

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
4,103
1
0
Originally posted by: ForumMaster
cool bridge but what would happen if someone had an accident and drove of the bridge? :Q

Same thing that happens when you drive off any other bridge? DIAF?
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
It's on my list of places to go when I drive round Europe. I must drive across that thing.
 

randomint

Banned
Sep 16, 2006
693
1
0
saw it on Frontiers of Construction. they started off on either end and had them both meet in the middle with astounding accuracy. amazing!
 

Alienwho

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2001
6,766
0
76
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
Originally posted by: Alienwho
What's the point of that bridge? Too practical to just pave a road down one hill and back up the other?

IIRC there already is a passage way like that. Just takes like 4 hours to traverse, where the bridge takes about 20 minutes.

Again, IIRC.
Yeah it is hard to see the exact landscape based on the photos. It is a very pretty bridge and area nonetheless. However, where i'm from, there's no bank that isn't too steep for dynamite to straighten out.