• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

World record 3Dmark03: the 20K barrier is shattered - 20429 !!!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
TO multi task you need more than one program open douchebag, what do you think they are going to multi task Word docs.
The sentence above this guy is a puddle jumper also a democrate but he's straight. He is also a gamer that I have know dought uses cheat codes. He has a below average income and doesn't have a clue as to why you need multi-tasking. Which is understandable since he uses an AMD processor LOL. BY the way I have edited and its not making the grammer structure changes
So far I don't see where I messed the call I said you were straight below average income and you don't have to vote to be a democrate and you say you don't use cheatcodes.
You are also mis informed AMD 64 is OPTI based just as the P4ee IS Xeon based who said anything about 64bit not I show me. and it was you who started the name calling fool. Also who said anthing about simple editing not I.
All prices are from new egg checK it out AMD is the one's that made the differant pin count wence the differant prices 756 940 939
I did not bargain shop I went to cpu's pressed AMD and intel AND these are the prices that are there and the cpu's you pointed out are not compareable to intel solutions anyway unless you can overclock the hell out of them which I know you can't Don't throw stones unless you want them back in spades kiddy!!
 
Originally posted by: Zinn2b
TO multi task you need more than one program open douchebag, what do you think they are going to multi task Word docs.
The sentence above this guy is a puddle jumper also a democrate but he's straight. He is also a gamer that I have know dought uses cheat codes. He has a below average income and doesn't have a clue as to why you need multi-tasking. Which is understandable since he uses an AMD processor LOL. BY the way I have edited and its not making the grammer structure changes
So far I don't see where I messed the call I said you were straight below average income and you don't have to vote to be a democrate and you say you don't use cheatcodes.
You are also mis informed AMD 64 is OPTI based just as the P4ee IS Xeon based who said anything about 64bit not I show me. and it was you who started the name calling fool
Click to expand...

I haven't heard of democrates, ive heard of democrats. However i dont vote, FYI though i am republican, and a conservative. You have no place saying these things. But to humor you how the hell can you say i have below avg income when im 16!!!!!! Im under 18 you cant measure my income working retail, it varies. You are an effin retard.

Why dont you do what we asked. Compare the chips evenly. Fix the prices. ANd then provide benchmarks. Awww whats wrong you gonna cry about it because we are being mean to you? :cookie: :cookie:

Go crawl back under your bridge, troll. I never said the A64FX wasn't Opteron based. I said it is NOT the same thing for lack of HT channels/lanes. You do know what those are right? Wasn't sure you dont seem to be too bright.

I admit i started the name calling. Ouch sue me then. Heres a :cookie:

-Kevin
 
Originally posted by: Zinn2b
TO multi task you need more than one program open douchebag, what do you think they are going to multi task Word docs.
The sentence above this guy is a puddle jumper also a democrate but he's straight. He is also a gamer that I have know dought uses cheat codes. He has a below average income and doesn't have a clue as to why you need multi-tasking. Which is understandable since he uses an AMD processor LOL. BY the way I have edited and its not making the grammer structure changes
So far I don't see where I messed the call I said you were straight below average income and you don't have to vote to be a democrate and you say you don't use cheatcodes.
You are also mis informed AMD 64 is OPTI based just as the P4ee IS Xeon based who said anything about 64bit not I show me. and it was you who started the name calling fool. Also who said anthing about simple editing not I.
All prices are from new egg checK it out AMD is the one's that made the differant pin count wence the differant prices 756 940 939
Click to expand...


Lets see some benchmarks?....

Something... anything at all to back up what you say.

All I've heard so far is hullabaloo... Give us RAM prices too.

As for multitasking... I say go AMD and get more RAM since it's cheaper.
 
Hay I was the one that asked to see all round benchies that support your position first . you show me yours I well show you mine
User 1234 you got me shook up now LOL

 
Originally posted by: Zinn2b
Hay I was the one that asked to see all round benchies that support your position first . you show me yours I well show you mine
User 1234 you got me shook up now LOL
Click to expand...


The bitching is caused by one thing

Your prices are terribly terribly wrong. Did you not expect us to go look?

This is caused by 1, 2 or all 3 of the following,

1. You need to learn to read numbers.

2. You bought intel, and paid too much for it and now you are pissed off.

3. You are just looking for a fight.

-green
 
Originally posted by: Zinn2b
Hay I was the one that asked to see all round benchies that support your position first . you show me yours I well show you mine
User 1234 you got me shook up now LOL
Click to expand...

Ok...

Anandtechs review of Intels new fastest processor

X-bits Review

HardOCP's review

Would you like me to go on, i can give another 20 or so sites? All of them look like AMD owns Intel in everything except encoding/decoding in which case they are very close anyways. Even HARDOCP which you said for (some reason, unknown to me) was Intel biased. Looks like AMD owns them in that too.

Go ahead now your graphs. Humor me.

-Kevin
 
MARKfw I stated that every Intel starting at 2.8 Well scale to beat AMD in all round usage. AT 3800 amd has intel in gaming but not all round usage
 
Originally posted by: Zinn2b
MARKfw I stated that every Intel starting at 2.8 Well scale to beat AMD in all round usage. AT 3800 amd has intel in gaming but not all round usage
Click to expand...

Ok.. I believe a random post over Gamingphreeks links...

:laugh:
 
We are all waiting for benchmarks. 🙂 Cmon Zinn we did out part and proved out point with many different sources, now why dont you back up all this crap you have been posting.

-Kevin
 
Originally posted by: Zinn2b
THATS NICE but it comes as know surprize to me since I have been researching the subject for some time now. But I truely believe that in the end the performance of dual cpu with 3.6 nacona's well be the hot setup . by the time custormers really start buying it well be 3.8.GHz nacona,s. How about those AMD people they just won't let go .Intel is King they were never dethroned period the Amd FX has already been tested with SLI and actually did Quit well but they came up short. and some here suggested that you can't compare a FX 55 to a Xeon I don't know why isn't a FX55 really an opty. INTEL THEY JUST KEEP COMING AT YOU
Click to expand...

Researching for some time now?... think you'd at least have a couple links. 😕
 
AGAIN MY PRICES ARE RIGHT I DID not bargain hunt I went to cpu's and pressed amd and intel and these are the exact prices listed Differant pin count differant prices Only the 940 And 939 compare to intel
AS for reviews they don't give the benchies for O/C much Beside we are talking about value here the intels well all scale @2.8 and up to compete with all amd solutions. YOUR right I am so disappointed that I paid $200 dollars for this CPU but I am over joyed about the $700 I spent on MY AMDFX53 939 THAT is barely better than my intel 3.2 @ 3.57 At gaming and inoline gaming the intel is better. That has something to do with intels LAN I do believe. Gaminggeek ealier you accused me of calling you a gay that was a lie again you accuse me when it is you that is lying. I understand your wet behind the ears but don't be so fast on the trigger. go back look at all the prices you will see am saying exactly what is there. MAN you have to be a democrat the way you lie you certainly can't be a right wing republican.
 
Originally posted by: Zinn2b
AGAIN MY PRICES ARE RIGHT I DID not bargain hunt I went to cpu's and pressed amd and intel and these are the exact prices listed Differant pin count differant prices Only the 940 And 939 compare to intel
AS for reviews they don't give the benchies for O/C much Beside we are talking about value here the intels well all scale @2.8 and up to compete with all amd solutions.
Click to expand...

Well I linked to Newegg earlier and both prices were off by $50. And didn't you say 2.4 earlier not 2.8. Also if either of those made it to 4ghz would that be quite an accomplishment, ~75% oc isn't it?

940 cannot compare to Intel it is server only dipsh!t! As for 939 yeah it compares with the high end intel whereas 754 compares to the lower end 3.4 and what not?

Cmon i did my part of the deal why cant you follow through with yours

Awww whats wong, can wittle bittie Zinnie not find any benchmarks? Did he get caught in a lie? Poor Zinnie :cookie:

-Kevin
 
It's alright man.. everyone makes idiot mistakes.. you should see my first post.. it was a slaughterhouse.. just stop posting on this topic.. give up and keep your pride.

-green
 
He isn't making a mistake check out all of his other posts. After that do a search or just ask about FelixDaKat, biggest troll in the AT forums. Get what im saying 😉

Cmon wittle Zinnie!

-Kevin
 
Lol he is funny... sometimes he'll type one sentence remarks, but as soon as someone disagrees with him slightly he'll go into the giant box of text mode which makes him look like a fool.

Things like "running a dual xeon server board is better for gaming"....

-green
 
Know I ain't quiting In the early AMD FX reviews they used a 940 Pin count FX so now your saying that all those reviewers cheated By using a server based board. Again if you go look at the prices you well see that I took only the ones that compare. There are many differant prices I also used retail only because they are the best value . And I do believe you are embarressed that I showed intel to be by far the best value. Ever price given is at new egg. It is you that is lying about the prices lowering amds and raising intels ' I did not look for the deal of the month as you did . I told u were to find my personell benchies at future mark orb . The question you should ask yourself is Why this troll gets such good performance from his PC Compared to all others not just 1 reviewers claims Which by the WAY fron stock3.2 GHz TO 3.57 I completly destroy. the facts are there go look whiners.
 
I just cruised by GH and saw this noob making a complete fool of himself and had to add my two cents. I'm sorry bro, but don't pretend you know what you are talking about when you capitalize your misspellings and incorrect synonym usage, then post price comparisons of 2.4 Northies to 3000+ Winchesters. They aren't even in the same performance ballpark and even if you are somehow comparing overclockability, the Winchester o/c's incredibly well and the 2.4 Northwood wouldn't catch a o/c'ed 3200+ with anything short of phase-change.
 
Go to Futuremark check out all scores on orb It is not a big deal for a 2.4 to reach 3.6 on air.the proof well lay there right in front of you. Another thing it is anadtechs reviews that always use a 2.4 to see how well a board O/C which in trueth is a disception to check out a boards true O/C value you need to O/C with the fastest cpu available. Not some cpu that a normal customer can't buy unlocked intels.Intel is buy far the best value my prices are correct. I once tried to use an AMD 64 to fly fish All I caught were suckers
 
By the way the hack that just tried to get into my PC I got you instead got the trace got it all your ass is mine.
 
I don't really think this intel newb knows much of anything about processors. Take a look at his processor lineup on page 3, they aren't even comparable. Please, troll, give us some facts, not random statements like "my processor from stock 3.2 to 3.57 completely destroys." Provide benchmarks from trustable sites, don't go by your own backwords way of thinking "hmm, this cheap intel processor is obviously as good as this athlon processor which is twice the price." Links to websites are your friend, please use them instead of saying "go to futuremark." Please, provide any evidence whatsoever. Don't put up any more posts basically saying "I know what I'm talking about so believe me or else I won't shut up"


PS your prices are not perfectly accurate.
 
Sweet Jesus you are a complete retard. Here want proof:

2800+ Retail $127.00

3000+ Retail $151

3200+ Newcastle $190

3200+ Winchester $210

3400+ Newcastle $219

3500+ Newcastle $272

3500+ Winchester $290

3700+ Clawhammer $461

3800+ Newcastle $630

FX-55 $849

INTEL:

2.4A $123

2.4B $129

2.4C $139

P4 520 (2.8GHZ) $162

P4 530 (3.0GHZ) $181

2.8C $181

3.0E $184

3.0C $185

P4 540 (3.2GHZ) $221

3.2E $223

3.0C $225

3.2C $245

P4 550 (3.4GHZ) $282

P4 560 (3.6GHZ) $465

3.4EE $1,019

Now my benchmarks showed that an Athlon 3500+ beats a 3.4EE and costs ~$800 less. Please xplain to me where the better value is. It seems to me that your results are screwed beyond recognition. Your Intel processors go as much as $50 cheaper, for instance the 3.2C.

As for Sckt 940 they did use it at the beginning however it is for server processors. I never said those reviews dont count they aren't going to be as fast though, but no worries the AMD chips still massacre the Intel chips across the board the one exception being Encoding/Decoding.

I believe all of my results are Retail however i think there might be some OEM intel CPU's which would give i it a lower price though.

Seems to me that 3.2-3.57 is a far cry from 2.4-4.0? Also just look at the new intel 560 that has more features than your chip so it should perform even better, no matter AMD still kills that chip in all except for encode/decode.

How am i lying? I gave EVERY SINGLE source i used, i dont own Newegg so i obviously cant change the prices sporadically. How am i lying.

Why dont you just Click Here and end all of this. Or you could just go cry in a corner because i caught you in a blatant lie and you are trolling, and flaming.

Oh yeah im still waiting for those benchmarks you promised. Cmon im waiting.

Kiss my arse loser... oh yeah no one tried to hack your computer, and if they did you probably wouldn't notice and be able to stop if without shutting down the machine.

-Kevin
 
Originally posted by: Zinn2b
By the way the hack that just tried to get into my PC I got you instead got the trace got it all your ass is mine.
Click to expand...

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA


wait I forgot something.....


AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

Gonna put that instead of I am people.. ahaha...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top