Workers Refuse to leave after getting laid off

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Dman877
Both sides have valid arguments. Bank of America isn't responsible for legal obligations of people they lend money to. They also have a right to withhold credit as they see fit. If anything, the company's assets should be liquidated and the employees compensated.

BoA assetss should be liqudated too under that argument.

Uhh no

Awwwww you work for a bank getting bailout money

No, he's just educated, unlike yourself.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Dman877
Both sides have valid arguments. Bank of America isn't responsible for legal obligations of people they lend money to. They also have a right to withhold credit as they see fit. If anything, the company's assets should be liquidated and the employees compensated.

BoA assetss should be liqudated too under that argument.

Uhh no

Awwwww you work for a bank getting bailout money

No, he's just educated, unlike yourself.

Says the anonymous coward
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Dman877
Both sides have valid arguments. Bank of America isn't responsible for legal obligations of people they lend money to. They also have a right to withhold credit as they see fit. If anything, the company's assets should be liquidated and the employees compensated.

BoA assetss should be liqudated too under that argument.

Uhh no

Awwwww you work for a bank getting bailout money

No, he's just educated, unlike yourself.

Says the anonymous coward

Dave, where do you work? You're not a coward, right?
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Dman877
Both sides have valid arguments. Bank of America isn't responsible for legal obligations of people they lend money to. They also have a right to withhold credit as they see fit. If anything, the company's assets should be liquidated and the employees compensated.

BoA assetss should be liqudated too under that argument.

Uhh no

Awwwww you work for a bank getting bailout money

No, he's just educated, unlike yourself.

Says the anonymous coward

Dave, where do you work? You're not a coward, right?

Everyone knows I am a contractor. What does that have to do with you being a coward?
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Dman877
Both sides have valid arguments. Bank of America isn't responsible for legal obligations of people they lend money to. They also have a right to withhold credit as they see fit. If anything, the company's assets should be liquidated and the employees compensated.

BoA assetss should be liqudated too under that argument.

Uhh no

Awwwww you work for a bank getting bailout money

No, he's just educated, unlike yourself.

Says the anonymous coward

Dave, where do you work? You're not a coward, right?

Everyone knows I am a contractor. What does that have to do with you being a coward?

What company are you contracting at coward? I bet they are hiring. Why can't you get a full-time job there?

Dave, you still hurt that I pwn'd you showing you that there are thousands of companies hiring, including my own. Yet, you are under some delusional idea that b/c the overall economy is not doing well that there aren't specific companies/industries that are growing.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
It seems like we never get the whole story when stuff like this happens. It seems likely, however, that the company execs were faced with a choice when business crumpled and BofA called their line of credit- somebody gets screwed, either BofA or the employees. Given that the execs likely have other dealings with BofA, it's a no-brainer- screw the workers, keep the bank happy...

Sadly, the workers would have been screwed whether BofA got bailed out or not, but the damage would have been more equitable sans bailout. Moral hazards abound in this whole scenario, favoring the big guy, of course.

Workers get to line up for the proceeds of the bankruptcy, where they *might* get a dime on the dollar several years down the road...
 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
Originally posted by: Farang
These economic problems were caused by banks making bad loans. Now some of you are complaining because a bank is refusing to make a bad loan. :confused:

We don;t know it is a bad loan. All we can make out is that BoA withdrew the line of credit. A lot of companies use a line of credit to meet payroll and if BoA has been given money to keep lines of credit flowing and doesn't do so then, yes, BoA has some questions to answer.


 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
This is becoming quite a historical event:

12-7-2008 Chicago workers' sit-in becomes rallying point

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said in a news release late Sunday that she had representatives at the factory investigating the closure.

One of the factory's workers, Silvia Mazon, said in Spanish that she needs the money owed to her for an $1,800 monthly house payment. The 40-year-old from Cicero said she has enough money saved to survive for one month.

"We're making history," she said.

Patrick Tyrrell, 22, of Chicago, visited the workers Saturday and returned the next day with home-cooked beans, rice, chicken and soup. Tyrrell said he felt he wanted to help, in part, because his grandfather was an electrical union member.

"This is an impressive historical event," he said.

Rep. Jan Schakowsky, an Illinois Democrat, called it the start of a movement. "This story has resonated around the world," she said.

 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
This is becoming quite a historical event:

12-7-2008 Chicago workers' sit-in becomes rallying point

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said in a news release late Sunday that she had representatives at the factory investigating the closure.

One of the factory's workers, Silvia Mazon, said in Spanish that she needs the money owed to her for an $1,800 monthly house payment. The 40-year-old from Cicero said she has enough money saved to survive for one month.

"We're making history," she said.

Patrick Tyrrell, 22, of Chicago, visited the workers Saturday and returned the next day with home-cooked beans, rice, chicken and soup. Tyrrell said he felt he wanted to help, in part, because his grandfather was an electrical union member.

"This is an impressive historical event," he said.

Rep. Jan Schakowsky, an Illinois Democrat, called it the start of a movement. "This story has resonated around the world," she said.

Interesting that you didn't read the full article and forgot:

At a news conference Sunday, President-elect Barack Obama said Republic should follow through on its commitments to its workers.

"The workers who are asking for the benefits and payments that they have earned, I think they're absolutely right and understand that what's happening to them is reflective of what's happening across this economy," Obama said.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: cubby1223

Banks failed partially because government regulations demanded they loan money to people / companies who cannot pay it back. That's the root of the housing industry failure, people not able to repay mortgages. So in your world, the solution to fixing the economy is to continue loaning money to people / companies who cannot pay it back?

Really, Dave, what is your solution? Blame is not a solution.


It's easier to just put the above quote in your signature and say nothing else. ;)

if your going to post here, you could at least know the basics. Even dave might understnad the truth behind that one (though i would not bet on it)
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,918
2,884
136
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Dman877
Both sides have valid arguments. Bank of America isn't responsible for legal obligations of people they lend money to. They also have a right to withhold credit as they see fit. If anything, the company's assets should be liquidated and the employees compensated.

BoA assetss should be liqudated too under that argument.

Uhh no

Awwwww you work for a bank getting bailout money

No, he's just educated, unlike yourself.

Says the anonymous coward

You give the Democrats on this board a bad name, I honestly do feel bad for them.
 
D

Deleted member 4644

Shortsighted cunts.

That is what I think of when I think about the various leaders (at all levels) who are allowing the very last of the manufacturing in the United States die.

Many of these companies *could* survive, if given "bridge" loans that would allow them to get through this storm. Maybe not all, but many.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Yet another union increases the cost of business forcing a plant shutdown and later cries about it. Great!
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,878
14,129
136
Originally posted by: winnar111
Yet another union increases the cost of business forcing a plant shutdown and later cries about it. Great!

What???? Where did you get that from (besides your ass)?

The business shut down because it used short-term loans to pay for payroll. They couldn't get any more short term loans because of the dried up credit markets, forcing them to close.
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
Originally posted by: winnar111
Yet another union increases the cost of business forcing a plant shutdown and later cries about it. Great!

What???? Where did you get that from (besides your ass)?

The business shut down because it used short-term loans to pay for payroll. They couldn't get any more short term loans because of the dried up credit markets, forcing them to close.

The company could always sell it's assets to pay it's workers.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: Dman877
Both sides have valid arguments. Bank of America isn't responsible for legal obligations of people they lend money to. They also have a right to withhold credit as they see fit. If anything, the company's assets should be liquidated and the employees compensated.

Winnar

BofA doesn't own them anything, the company does. Plus would you give a line of credit to a home building company right now? Because, you know, real estate is doing so well and all.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
It's the company problem, not BoA. Why should BoA continue to provide credit to a company that can't pay it back?

Why should us taxpayers give money to BoA that they are not going to pay back?

They are - tax payers got equity stake and warrants.
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Dman877
Both sides have valid arguments. Bank of America isn't responsible for legal obligations of people they lend money to. They also have a right to withhold credit as they see fit. If anything, the company's assets should be liquidated and the employees compensated.

Winnar

BofA doesn't own them anything, the company does. Plus would you give a line of credit to a home building company right now? Because, you know, real estate is doing so well and all.
I'm still trying to understand why their credit was cut off, though. Yeah home sales are down, but it sounds like they were still making good money.

At the high point of the residential construction market, product sales to home builders totaled $30 million at the company. This year, those sales will total $6 million, said Amy Zimmerman, vice president of sales and marketing. Sales of replacement windows will total $38 million this year, down from $40 million.

"Banks are in the business to make money and at some point they have to make a business decision and that's what this is," Zimmerman said. "Certainly the new construction segment didn't help. If the bank saw some type of light at the end of the tunnel, maybe the bank would have extended a line of credit to Republic."
http://www.chicagotribune.com/...sdec04,0,7537071.story

And it sounds like they've already downsized a lot from the height of the housing boom, surely if they were in trouble they would've done more cutbacks?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,009
55,448
136
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
Originally posted by: winnar111
Yet another union increases the cost of business forcing a plant shutdown and later cries about it. Great!

What???? Where did you get that from (besides your ass)?

The business shut down because it used short-term loans to pay for payroll. They couldn't get any more short term loans because of the dried up credit markets, forcing them to close.

Winnar is just a troll, your best bet is to insult him and move on.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Farang
These economic problems were caused by banks making bad loans. Now some of you are complaining because a bank is refusing to make a bad loan. :confused:

We don;t know it is a bad loan. All we can make out is that BoA withdrew the line of credit. A lot of companies use a line of credit to meet payroll and if BoA has been given money to keep lines of credit flowing and doesn't do so then, yes, BoA has some questions to answer.

I agree... Pre-bailout there were financial experts warning if the banks weren't bailed out they'd pull back credit lines and we'd see companies have problems meeting payrolls. The bailout was passed. Wasn't it done to prevent precisely this?
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
It's the company problem, not BoA. Why should BoA continue to provide credit to a company that can't pay it back?

Why should us taxpayers give money to BoA that they are not going to pay back?

They are - tax payers got equity stake and warrants.

I agree, the taxpayers will get their money back. BoA has no obligation to fund this issue.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
I understand the frustration of the workers and all, but this is stupid and misguided.

A lends money to B. B has obligations to C. A decides B is no longer a good credit risk, and pulls the plug on the credit line. B is not able to meet obligations to C. Why the heck does anyone think A owes anything to C or has any responsibility to C? Dumb emotional thinking clouds rational thought.

Also, if the company was a good credit risk, you'd think they could get a loan elsewhere. The fact that they (apparently) can't, indicates that they are not a very good credit risk at this point (not surprising). It's not BoA's fault that the company can not meet it's obligations.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Sad

The thread is full of Republican/BoA apologists

:(

Obama and the Democrats approved of the bailout, dumbass.

Really? Where was I when Obama became President?

How did he accomplish that before he got sworn in?

He must truly be a Mystical.

He voted for it as a Senator you dumbass.
mcowned!

 

Cattlegod

Diamond Member
May 22, 2001
8,687
1
0
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Sad

The thread is full of Republican/BoA apologists

:(

Obama and the Democrats approved of the bailout, dumbass.

Really? Where was I when Obama became President?

How did he accomplish that before he got sworn in?

He must truly be a Mystical.

He voted for it as a Senator you dumbass.

McOwned again.