Originally posted by: ronnn
Also have a reputation of defending nvidia at all costs. Anyways if we don't start reading posts stating ownership of both cards and the 6800 series is just better (in personal experience), than I will be wrong. Has happened before. :beer:
You'll wait a long time for that, I don't know how a guy using a X800XT PE could say that card owns 6800Us any more than a 6800U owner could say the the reverse. They're pretty equal.
There are some good reasons in general to buy 6800GTs over X800Pros, but I wouldn't call it "ownage".
With the official announcement of the demise of the X700XT, ATI doesn't compete at $200-$300 at all, but will again next year. For now they compete well at the low and high end.
Like I've always said, if I had to pick ONE card this year it would be nVidia based, just for the more modern feature set. I stand by that, I don't see ATI offering any real advantage to offset the lack of DX9c or SLI possibility. (actually SLI does flat out OWN, hopefully I'll get to try it)
This year the edge went nVidia, next year who knows? Competition is good for all concerned and I personally wish for days gone buy when a CGW card roundup might have five competing chipsets. Those were the fun times, when you didn't have two companies splitting hairs for advantage- 3dfx, Matrox, Power VR, nVidia, Rendition, S3 all brought good products to market with advantages to each. I used to buy a video card a month and have never cared what the name on the box was.

:beer: