• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

woot, I finished my algorithm!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
BTW,
1. what the hell do you want roots for all those values for?
2. Why not analyze the function a different way?
Ignore the p*t^4 term for a moment and graph the rest of the function

Now, on top of that function, graph p*t^4..... this will look like a parabola, a little flattened near the vertex, with the vertex on the origin... for negative values of p, it will be upside down, for positive values of p, it will be rightside up. The larger the absolute value of p, the more stretched vertically the curve will look. For absolute values less than 1, the curve will look stretched horizontally.

Now, your original function, including the t^4 term, will be the geometric sum of the two curves.

It would be possible in mathematica to write a program to animate the curves as p varied... I don't have a clue how to do it in maple, though, since I never used maple.

 
Back
Top