Ancalagon44
Diamond Member
- Feb 17, 2010
- 3,274
- 202
- 106
It's the woman's right to choose. If the man wants a baby that badly, adopt one.
Stop thinking with your dick.
Why does the man not have that right?
I thought we wanted gender equality?
It's the woman's right to choose. If the man wants a baby that badly, adopt one.
Stop thinking with your dick.
Why does the man not have that right?
I thought we wanted gender equality?
I see the point that you are making, but lets say for instance that you are involved with a woman and you both make a choice to have a child. Later she decides to abort that child and you think you shouldn't have even a small say so about it? None.
Reverse that and say she becomes pregnant and you as the father want no part of it even though you will be required to support this child until it is 18 years old. You still get no say so in what she decides to do even though it will also effect you the rest of your life.
Seems a little biased in my opinion.
Why does the man not have that right?
I thought we wanted gender equality?
Come back when you can carry a fetus, and give birth.
If someone does not or cannot have the experience of another, it disqualifies them from the conversation?
In this case yes, yes it does (unless you want to try pushing a watermelon out of your asshole)
Why?
If someone does not or cannot have the experience of another, it disqualifies them from the conversation?
I'm with ya there BoomerD. The problem is that certain types in this country want to create laws that allow men to procreate all they want, and then the right to tell the women what they're going to do about it.
Cuz uh, the person bearing the pain should be the one deciding if they want to bear it?
He started down the gender equality path, so I tossed that out there.
My bottom line is this, don't fuck anything you can....find someone you care about and much of this becomes moot.
Before you start having unprotected sex, make sure a conversation takes place regarding the consequences. Of course, dude's tend to lie, and you have a ton of single mothers due to that. Once in a while, there's a guy who gets burned...that's not the norm.
Surely there is something more to pregnancy and childbirth than physical pain that should be considered here.
That's useful advice.
But a stance on abortion that refers directly to not getting pregnant if you don't want a child is useless to a discussion on abortion.
Who are they?
Surely there is something more to pregnancy and childbirth than physical pain that should be considered here.
One cannot through policy honor fully the rights, feelings, values and potential rights, feelings, and values simultaneously of all the mother, father, and fetus. There are compromises which I think are less objectionable, but all positions are a compromise, and I find it flat wrong to deny any single party a seat at the table.
Who do you think is "hurt" by the pro-choice position?Let me be clear @ch33zw1z and @Ns1. My political position is pro-choice. But that is merely the compromise that seems to fit reality best (much for the same reasons you have argued). But I think supporting that position by invalidating others on their face is wrong, and I suspect you do it to protect yourself from dealing with the reality that any stance on abortion hurts someone.
Who do you think is "hurt" by the pro-choice position?
Why does the man not have that right?
I thought we wanted gender equality?
Let's not forget the accompanying physical health risks of pregnancy and giving birth.When men can get pregnant and go through all the hormonal changes that women do...as well as give birth, then they will might get that right.
have 2 kids. If my wife chose to abort them, would you begrudge me if I were very upset about it?
I think you're equivocating what "hurt" means. You are not physically injured nor have your rights been violated.I have 2 kids. If my wife chose to abort them, would you begrudge me if I were very upset about it? Would you tell someone grieving from a miscarriage to get over it because no one was hurt?
